Urban Renewal Mega Projects and Residents’ Quality of Life: Evidence from Historical Religious Center of Mashhad Metropolis
- 129 Downloads
Urban decay is the process by which a historical city center, or an old part of a city, falls into decrepitude and faces serious problems. Urban management, therefore, implements renewal mega projects with the goal of physical and functional revitalization, retrieval of socioeconomic capacities, and improving of quality of life of residents. Ignoring the complexities of these large-scale interventions in the old and historical urban fabrics may lead to undesirable consequences, including an additional decline of quality of life. Thus, the present paper aims to assess the impact of renewal mega projects on residents’ subjective quality of life, in the historical religious district of the holy city of Mashhad (Samen District). A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods of impact assessment, including questionnaires, semi-structured personal interviews, and direct observation, is used in this paper. The results yield that the Samen Renewal Project has significantly reduced the resident’s subjective quality of life, due to its undesirable impacts on physical, socio-cultural, and economic environments.
KeywordsQuality of life Urban renewal Mega project Impact assessment Mashhad Iran
The authors declare that no body provided intellectual assistance, technical help, or special equipment or materials.
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Dale OJ. Urban Planning in Singapore: The Transformation of a City. Oxford: Oxford university press; 1999.Google Scholar
- 2.Hoffman V. The lost history of urban renewal. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Place-making and Urban Sustainability. 2008;1(3):281–301.Google Scholar
- 3.Forouhar A, Kheyroddin R. The impact of commercialization on the spatial quality of residential neighbourhoods: evidence from Nasr neighbourhood of Tehran. Geographical Planning of Space Quarterly Journal. 2016;6(20):63–84.Google Scholar
- 13.Marans RW, Stimson RJ. Social Indicators Research Series: Investigating Quality of Urban Life: Theory, Methods, and Empirical Research. Vol 45: Springer Netherlands; 2011.Google Scholar
- 14.Szalai A, Andrews F. The quality of life: comparative studies, vol. 20. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1980.Google Scholar
- 17.Mulligan G, Carruthers J, Cahill M. Urban quality of life and public policy: a survey. In: Capello R, Nijkamp P, editors. Contributions to economic analysis, vol. 266. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B; 2004.Google Scholar
- 19.Carr D. Encyclopedia of the life course and human development. Detroit, MI: Macmillan Reference USA; 2009.Google Scholar
- 21.Mitchell G. Indicators as tools to guide progress on the sustainable development pathway. London: Urban International Press; 2000.Google Scholar
- 22.Hazel H, Lickerman J, Flynn P. Calvert–Henderson quality of life indicators: a new tool for assessing national trends. Bethseda, MD: Calvert Group; 2000.Google Scholar
- 24.Johansson S. Conceptualizing and measuring quality of life for national policy. Social Indicators Research Series: Assessing Quality of Life and Living Conditions to Guide National Policy. Vol 11. Dordrecht: Springer; 2002.Google Scholar
- 26.Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2013.Google Scholar
- 28.Roche CJ. Impact Assessment for Development Agencies: Learning to Value Change: Oxford: Oxfam; 1999.Google Scholar
- 29.Statistical Year Book of Mashhad. Mashhad: Department of Planning and Development of Mashhad Municipality; 2016. SYBM.Google Scholar
- 30.Report on the Samen Renewal Project. Mashhad: Department of Urban Planning and Architecture of Mashhad Municipality; 2002.Google Scholar
- 33.Report on the Residents’ Problems of the Central Fabric of Mashhad. Mashhad: City Council of Mashhad; 2016. RPCFM.Google Scholar
- 34.Hechter M, Horne C. Theories of social order : a reader. 2nd ed. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
- 35.Western JS, Lanyon A. Anomie in the Asia Pacific region: the Australian study. In: Atteslander P, Gransow B, Western J, editors. Comparative anomie research: hidden barriers-hidden potential for social development. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd; 1999.Google Scholar
- 37.the Official Crime Statistics of Mashhad City. Mashhad: Mashhad Police Department; 2016. OCSMC.Google Scholar
- 38.Perspectives on Global Development. Social cohesion in a shifting world. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2012. p. 2011.Google Scholar
- 39.Ashley C, Carney D. Sustainable livelihoods; lessons from early experiences. London: Department for International Development; 1999.Google Scholar
- 40.Karl M. Monitoring and Evaluating Stakeholder Participation in Agriculture and Rural Development Projects: A Literature Review. Rome: Sustainable Development Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United nations; 2000.Google Scholar