CEA Response and Depth of Response (DpR) to Predict Clinical Outcomes of First-Line Cetuximab Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- 642 Downloads
The decrease in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level is faster and greater during cetuximab treatment than bevacizumab treatment and correlates with prolonged survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who receive cetuximab.
We investigated if the degree of change in the CEA value can serve as a diagnostic tool for predicting survival, as well as tumor regression in mCRC patients treated with cetuximab combined regimen as first-line treatment.
Patients and Methods
Associations among the CEA decrease, depth of response (DpR), and clinical outcomes were evaluated in 113 patients with mCRC from two phase II trials of first-line therapy: the JACCRO CC-05 trial of cetuximab plus FOLFOX and the CC-06 trial of cetuximab plus SOX. Analysis was performed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. A 75% decrease in the CEA was used as the cut-off value to define the CEA response and discriminate CEA responders on the basis of the results of a previous study.
Ninety-two patients were eligible for analyses of both CEA and DpR. The median CEA decrease was 67.4%, and the median time to CEA nadir was 2.8 months, which was similar to the median time to DpR of 3.0 months. The DpR was associated with PFS and OS (rs = 0.56, P < 0.0001; rs = 0.39, P = 0.0090, respectively); moreover, the CEA decrease correlated with PFS (rs = 0.56, P < 0.0001), as well as OS (rs = 0.35, P = 0.019). CEA responders had significantly longer PFS (11.8 vs. 5.5 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, P = 0.0009) and slightly, but not significantly longer OS (36.2 vs. 23.5 months; HR 0.57; P = 0.072) than CEA non-responders. The CEA decrease was statistically significantly associated with the DpR (rs = 0.44, P < 0.0001).
We thank the patients, their families, and the investigators who participated in the JACCRO CC-05 and CC-06 trials. We also thank Dr. Toshifusa Nakajima for trial support, Sachika Koyama for editorial assistance, and Peter Star (Medical Network K.K.) for English editorial support.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional or national research committee (or both) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
This study was supported by the Japan Clinical Cancer Research Organization (JACCRO).
Conflict of Interest
Author Y.S. has received honoraria from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharma, Yakult Honsha, Takeda, and Merck Serono. Author W.I. has received consulting fees from Merck Serono, Daiichi Sankyo, Zeria Pharmaceutical, and Ono Pharmaceutical; research funding from Merck Serono, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda, and Eisai; and honoraria from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Merck Serono, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda, Nippon Kayaku and Sawai Pharmaceutical Co. Author A.T. has received honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharma, and Merck Serono. Author M.N. has received honoraria from Merck Serono, Takeda, Chugai Pharma, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Yakult Honsha, Lilly Japan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer, Ajinomoto, Shionogi, Pfizer, and Ono Pharmaceutical. Author M.K. has received honoraria from Merck Serono, Takeda, Chugai Pharma, and Yakult Honsha. Author M.T. has received consulting fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Shionogi, AbbVie GK, Astra Zeneca Co., and Hisamitsu Pharma Co.; and honoraria from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. The other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
- 3.Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T, Kiani A, Vehling-Kaiser U, Al-Batran SE, et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1065–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Sepulveda AR, Hamilton SR, Allegra CJ, Grody W, Cushman-Vokoun AM, Funkhouser WK, et al. Molecular biomarkers for the evaluation of colorectal cancer: guideline from the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:1453–86.Google Scholar
- 19.Huang SC, Lin JK, Lin TC, Chen WS, Yang SH, Wang HS, et al. Concordance of Carcinoembryonic antigen ratio and response evaluation criteria in solid tumors as prognostic surrogate indicators of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:2262–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Michl M, Stintzing S, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Kiani A, Vehling-Kaiser U, et al. CEA response is associated with tumor response and survival in patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type and extended RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab (FIRE-3 trial). Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1565–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Antoniotti C, Lonardi S, Masi G, Salvatore L, et al. Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response predict long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: results from phase III TRIBE trial by the Gruppo Oncologico del Nord Ovest. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1188–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Fakih MG, Padmanabhan A. CEA monitoring in colorectal cancer. What you should know. Oncology (Williston Park). 2006;20:579–87.Google Scholar
- 27.Heinemann V, Modest DP, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Kiani A, Vehling-Kaiser U, et al. Gender and tumor location as predictors for efficacy: influence on endpoints in first-line treatment with FOLFIRI in combination with cetuximab or bevacizumab in the AIO KRK 0306 (FIRE3) trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(5 suppl; abstr 3600).Google Scholar
- 28.von Einem JC, Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Vehling-Kaiser U, Stauch M, Hass HG, et al. Left-sided primary tumors are associated with favorable prognosis in patients with KRAS codon 12/13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab plus chemotherapy: an analysis of the AIO KRK-0104 trial. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014;140:1607–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Sunakawa Y, Ichikawa W, Tsuji A, Denda T, Segawa Y, Negoro Y, et al. Prognostic impact of primary tumor location on clinical outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer treated with Cetuximab plus Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy: a subgroup analysis of the JACCRO CC-05/06 trials. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017;16:e171–e180.Google Scholar