Coordinating Pricing, Ordering and Advertising for Perishable Products Over an Infinite Horizon
- 100 Downloads
Numerous empirical studies show that advertising effort can stimulate demand in both current and future periods, and there is an interaction between pricing, advertising and ordering decisions. How do these decisions interact with each other and what is the effect of advertising on pricing and ordering decisions? To understand this interaction, we consider a newsvendor-type firm that sells a perishable product in a stable market and dynamically determines the joint ordering, pricing and advertising strategies. The problem is modeled as an infinite horizon newsvendor problem with an advertising carryover effect and price-sensitive demand. We characterize the optimal pricing, advertising and inventory strategies and their comparative statics, and consider how this policy differs from the traditional approach without the advertising effect. We show that the optimal effective advertising level is monotonically increasing with the effective advertising level in the previous period, and hence the optimal strategies (advertising, pricing, inventory level) globally converge to the steady states in the long run. We numerically show that the optimal policy can reap significant profit, which underscores the importance of the advertising-driven ordering and pricing strategies.
KeywordsPricing newsvendor problem advertising carryover effect perishable product
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The authors would like to thank the associate editor for his patience and effort in handling this paper and the anonymous referees for their help to greatly improve the quality of the paper.
This research is supported by a grant from National Science Foundation of China (No. 71371146), and a research fund for Academic Team of Young Scholars at Wuhan University (No. Whu2016013).
- Fisher, M.L. (1997). What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Business Review, 75: 105–117.Google Scholar
- Hanssens, D., Parsons, L. & Schultz, R. (2001). Market Response Models: Econometric and Time Series Analysis, Second Edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Chapter 9.Google Scholar
- Li, C & Sexton, R.J. (2013). Grocery-retailer pricing behavior with implications for farmer welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 38(2): 141–158.Google Scholar
- Netessine, S. & Rudi, N. (2004). Supply chain structures on the internet and the role of marketing-operations interaction. Simchi-Levi, D., S. D. Wu & M. Shen (eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the E-business Era, Kluwer, 607–641.Google Scholar
- Sainathan, A. (2013). Pricing and replenishment of competing perishable product variants under dynamic demand substitution. Production and Operations Management, 22(5): 1157–1181.Google Scholar
- Topkis, D.M. (1998). Supermodularity and Complementarity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
- Wohlgenant, M.K. (2001). Marketing margins: Empirical analysis, Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Volume 1, Part B, Chapter 16: 933–970.Google Scholar
- Wohlgenant, M.K. & Mullen, J.D. (1987). Modeling the farm-retail price spread for beef. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 12(2): 119–125.Google Scholar
- Yano, C.A. & Gilbert, S.M. (2003). Coordinated pricing and production/procurement decisions: A review. Chakravarty, A., J. Eliashberg eds. ManagingBusiness Interfaces: Marketing, Engineering and Manufacturing Perspectives, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.Google Scholar