Advertisement

An outline of the varieties of the second-order systems sciences

  • Karl H. Müller
Article
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

The systems sciences are based on a universal language of systems which can be used within most academic disciplines in their endeavors for exploring the world. Currently, systems sciences cover a wide variety of different approaches like complex adaptive systems, resilient systems or systems engineering. One of the future extensions of the systems sciences comes through the applications of second-order systems science as a new field of reflexive studies on first-order systems science. This article provides a general background on the relations of first-order science and second-order science in general and then goes on to sketch a basic outline for the second-order systems sciences and their potentials for quality control and for innovations for the first-order systems sciences.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Ashby, W. R. (1981). Mechanisms of intelligence: ross ashbys writings on cybernetics. In: Conant, R. (ed), Seaside: Intersystems Publications, 433–437.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Balakrishnan, A. V. & Thoma, M. (eds.) (1984). System Modeling and Optimization. Berlin:Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bejan, A. (1997). Advanced Engineering Thermodynamics, second edition. New York:WileyGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bejan, A. (2016). The Physics of Life: The Theory of Everything. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bejan, A. & Lorente, S. (2008), Design with Constructal Theory. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Bensoussan, A. & Lions, J. L. (eds.) (1977). New Trends in Systems Analysis. International Symposium, Versailles, France, Dec. 13-17 1976. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Bertalanffy, L.v. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George BrazillerGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Bertalanffy, L.v. (1981). A systems view of man: collected essays. In: Paul A. LaViolette (ed), Boulder. Westview Press.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.T. & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Bowling, A. (2005). Measuring Health. A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales (3rd edition). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Bunge, M. (1977). Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Ontology I: the Furniture of The World. Dordrecht:Reidel.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Bunge, M. (1979). Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Ontology II: a World of Systems. Dordrecht:Reidel.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Bunge, M. (1983a). Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Epistemology and Methodology I: Exploring the World. Dordrecht:Reidel.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Bunge, M. (1983b). Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Epistemology and Methodology II: Understanding the World. Dordrecht:Reidel.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Cabena, P., Hadjnian, P., Stadler, R., Verhees, J. & Zanasi, A. (1997). Discovering Data Mining: from Concept to Implementation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Cabrera, D. & Cabrera, L. (2015). Systems Thinking Made Simple. New Hope for Solving Wicked Problems. Ithaca:Odyssean Press.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Cabrera, D., Colosi, L. Lobdell, C. (2008). Systems thinking. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31(3): 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Card, N.A. (2012). Applied Meta-Analysis for Social Science Research. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Chaitin, G. (2009). Evolution of mutating software. EATCS Bulletin, 97: 157–164Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Chernoff, H. (1973). The use of faces to represent points in k-dimensional space graphically. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68(342): 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Cooper, H.M. (2009). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach (4th edition). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Cooper, H.M., Hedges, L.V. & Valentine, J. (eds.) (2009). The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2nd edition). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Egger, M., Davey-Smith, G. & Altman, D.G. (eds.) (2001). Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in Context (2nd edition). London: BMJ Pub. Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Emery, E. F. (ed.) (1981). Systems Thinking: 2. Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    ESFRI (2006). European roadmap for research infrastructures. Report 2006. Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    ESFRI (2008). European roadmap for research infrastructures. Roadmap 2008. Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    ESFRI (2011). Strategy report on research infrastructures. Roadmap 2010. Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Flury, B. & Riedwyl, H. (1981). Graphical representation of multivariate data by means of asymmetrical faces. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(376): 757–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Forrester, J.W. (1961). Industrial Dynamics. Waltham: Pegasus CommunicationsGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Forrester, J.W. (1968). Principles of Systems (2nd edition). Waltham: Pegasus Communications.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Forrester, J.W. (1969). Urban Dynamics. Waltham: Pegasus Communications.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Forrester, J.W. (1971). World Dynamics. Cambridge: Wright-Allen Press.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Gall, J. (1990). Systemantics: The Underground Text of Systems Lore: How Systems Really Work and Especially How They Fail (3rd edition). Ann Arbor: The General Systemantics Press.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Gerbode, F. A. (2013). Beyond Psychology: An Introduction to Metapsychology. Ann Arbor: US: Applied Metapsychology International Press.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Gigch, J.P.V. (1991). System Design Modeling and Metamodeling. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Glanville, R. (2012). The Black Box, vol. I: Cybernetic Circles. Wien: edition echoraum.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Glanville, R. (2014). The Black Box, vol. II: Living in Cybernetic Circles. Wien: edition echoraum.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Glass, G.V. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5: 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Glass, G. V., McGaw, B. & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in Social Research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Glatzer, W., Camfield, L., Møller, V. & Rojas, M. (eds.) (2015). Global Handbook of Quality of Life. Exploration of Well-Being of Nations and Continents. Dorderecht:Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Guo, Y. & Grossman, R. (eds.) (1999), High Performance Data Mining: Scaling Algorithms, Applications and Systems. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Han, J., Kamber, M. & Pei, J. (2011). Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques (3rd edition). Waltham: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Hedges, L.V. & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. New York: Academic Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Helbing, D. (1993). Stochastische Methoden, Nichtlineare Dynamik und Quantitative Modelle Sozialer Prozesse. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    Heylighen F., Joslyn C. & Turchin V. (eds.) (1995). The Quantum of Evolution. Toward a Theory of Metasystem Transitions. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    Higgins, J.P.T. & Green, S. (eds.) (2008). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Hollingsworth, R.J. & Hollingsworth, E.J. (2011). Major Discoveries, Creativity, and the Dynamics of Science. Wien: edition echoraum.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    Hunt, M. (1999). How Science Takes Stock: the Story of Meta-Analysis. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    Hunter, J.E. & Schmidt, F.L. (1990). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    Hunter, J.E. & Schmidt, F.L. (2014). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (3rd edition). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    Independent Commission on Population and Quality of Life (1996). Caring for the Future. Making the Next Decades Provide a Life Worth Living. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. [52]
    Janert, P.K. (2010). Data Analysis with Open Source Tools. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  53. [53]
    Kajfež-Bogataj, L., Müller, K.H., Svetlik, I. & Toš, N. (eds.) (2010). Modern RISC-Societies. Towards a New Paradigm for Societal Evolution. Wien: edition echoraum.Google Scholar
  54. [54]
    Köhler, W. (1969). Closed and open systems. In: Emery, F.E. (ed.), Systems Thinking. Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 59-69.Google Scholar
  55. [55]
    Kulinskaya, E., Morgenthaler, S. & Staudte, R.G. (2009). Analysis: a Guide to Calibrating and Combining Statistical Evidence. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    Kumar, S. (2007). Spiritual Compass: the Three Qualities of Life. Foxhole: Green Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  57. [57]
    Lipsey, M. & Wilson, D. (2000). Practical Meta-Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  58. [58]
    Littell, J.H., Corcoran, J. & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. [59]
    Liu, B. (2007). Web Data Mining: Exploring Hyperlinks, Contents and Usage Data. Berlin:Springer.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    Malnar, B. & Müller, K.H. (2015). Surveys and Reflexivity: a Second-Order Analysis of the European Social Survey (ESS). Wien: edition echoraum.Google Scholar
  61. [61]
    Margulis, L. (1981). Early Life. Boston: Jones & Bartlett.Google Scholar
  62. [62]
    Margulis, L. (1993). Symbiosis in Cell Evolution (2nd edition). New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  63. [63]
    Margulis, L. (1998). Symbiotic Planet: a New Look at Evolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  64. [64]
    Maturana, H.R. & Varela, F.J. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: the Realization of the Living. Dordecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. [65]
    Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. & Behrens III, W. W. (1972). The Limits to Growth: a Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. Universe Books.Google Scholar
  66. [66]
    Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L. & Randers, J. (1991). Beyond the Limits: Confronting the Global Collapse, Envisioning a Sustainable Future. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  67. [67]
    Meadows, D.L., Randers, J. & Meadows, D.H. (2004). Limits to Growth: the 30-Year Update. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  68. [68]
    Meadows, D.H. (2009). Thinking in Systems: a Primer. London:Earthscan.Google Scholar
  69. [69]
    Müller, K.H. (2013). Die grammatik des neuen. In: Fischer, H.R. (ed.), Wie kommt Neues in die Welt? Phantasie, Intuition und der Ursprung von Kreativität. Göttingen:Velbrück Wissenschaft, 43-61.Google Scholar
  70. [70]
    Müller, K.H. (2013a). Lebenslagen, ungleichheit und lebensqualität aus radikal konstruktivistischer perspektive. In: Kolland, F. & Müller, K.H. (eds.), Alter und Gesellschaft im Umbruch. Festschrift für Anton Amann. Wien:edition echoraum, 219–261.Google Scholar
  71. [71]
    Müller, K.H. (2013b). Second-order analysen als neues aufgabenfeld von sozialwissenschaftlichen datenarchiven. e-WISDOM, 6: 85–106.Google Scholar
  72. [72]
    Müller, K.H. (2016). Second-Order Science: the Revolution of Scientific Structures. Wien:edition echoraum.Google Scholar
  73. [73]
    Müller, K.H. (2017). Second-order science and new cybernetics. In: Carayannis, E.G., Campbell, D.F.J. & Efthymiopoulos, M.P. (eds.), Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy and Cyber-Defense. Berlin:Springer.Google Scholar
  74. [74]
    Müller, K.H. & Toš, N. (2012). Towards a New Kind of Social Science: Social Research in the Context of Science II and RISC-Societies. Wien: edition echoraum.Google Scholar
  75. [75]
    Nisbet, R., Elder, J. & Miner, G. (2009). Handbook of Statistical Analysis and Data Mining Applications. Amsterdam:Elsevier.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  76. [76]
    Nussbaum, M.C. & Sen, A. (eds.) (1993). The Quality of Life. Oxford:Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. [77]
    Pani, N. (2009). Hinduism. In: Peil, J. & Staveren, I.V. (eds.), Handbook of Economics and Ethics. London:Edward Elgar, 216–222.Google Scholar
  78. [78]
    Petticrew, M. & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. [79]
    Phillips, D. (2006). Quality of Life: Concept, Policy and Practice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. [80]
    Pigott, T.D. (2012). Advances in Meta-Analysis. New York: Springer.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  81. [81]
    Rapley, M. (2008). Quality of Life Research: a Critical Introduction (4th edition). London:Sage.Google Scholar
  82. [82]
    Rescher, N. (1978). Scientific Progress: a Philosophical Essay on the Economics of Research in Natural Science. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  83. [83]
    Rothstein, H., Sutton, A. & Borenstein, M. (2005), Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  84. [84]
    Russell, M.A. (2011). Mining the Social Web: Analyzing Data from Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Other Social Media Sites. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  85. [85]
    Sicherl, P. (2012). Time Distance in Economics and Statistics: New Insights from Existing Data. Wien: edition echoraum.Google Scholar
  86. [86]
    Sornette, D. (2006). Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences: Chaos, Fractals, Selforganization and Disorder: Concepts and Tools. Berlin: Springer.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  87. [87]
    Surowiecki, J. (2005). The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  88. [88]
    Sutton, A.J., Abrams, K.R., Jones, D.R., Sheldon, T.A. & Song, F. (2000). Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  89. [89]
    Theodoridis, S. & Koutroumbas, K. (2008). Pattern Recognition (4th edition). Amsterdam:Elsevier.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  90. [90]
    Welton, N.J., Sutton, A.J., Cooper, N.J., Abrams, K.R. & Ades, A.E. (2012). Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making in Healthcare. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. [91]
    Wagner, M. & Weiß, B. (2014). Meta-analyse. In: Baur, N. & Blasius, J. (eds.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, pp.1117–1128. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  92. [92]
    Whitehead, A. (2002). Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. [93]
    Witten, I.H. & Frank, E. (2005). Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques (2nd edition). Amsterdam:Elsevier.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  94. [94]
    Wurman, R. S. (1989). Information Anxiety: What to Do When Information Doesn’t Tell You What You Need to Know. New York: Doubleday Books.Google Scholar
  95. [95]
    Wurman, R. S. et al. (2000). Information Anxiety 2 (2nd edition). Indianapolis: Que Publishing.Google Scholar
  96. [96]
    Ye, N. (2003). The Handbook of Data Mining. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  97. [97]
    Zipf, G.K. (1949). Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge:Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Academy for Systems Science and CyberneticsSteinbeis Transfer Center New CyberneticsViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations