Abstract
Increasing carbon emissions from large-scale human activities have contributed to global climate change, which has resulted in an increase in significant human crises. Therefore, as carbon abatement is a public good, coping with climate change is also a public-good; however, it suffers from many free-rider incentives, leading to a tragedy of the commons. Overcoming this challenge from a systemic perspective, requires that all sectors such as industry, government, and citizens on global, national, and regional levels engage in low-carbon development and the implementation of fair and efficient climate policies. Through a theoretical exploration of carbon abatement and a systemic description of low-carbon systems, this paper developed a cybernetic framework for coping with climate change, which consists of a cloud platform for data analysis, meta-synthetic engineering for decision support, a polycentric approach to extensive consultation and various functional goal achievement modules. On this basis, by combining the “invisible hand” and “visible hand” and by integrating negotiation at the global level, cooperation at the national level and knowledge at the local level, a multilevel policymaking model is proposed to address complex climate change problems. This cybernetic paradigm based innovative approach could provide valuable illumination to stakeholders seeking to cope with climate change.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold, C. A. (2002). The reconstitution of property: Property as a web of interests. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 26 (2): 281–364.
Boyd, R. & Ibarrarán, M. E. (2002). Costs of compliance with the Kyoto Protocol: a developing country perspective. Energy Economics, 24(1): 21–39.
Clemson, B. (1984). Cybernetics: A New Management Tool. Abacus Press, Kent.
Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3: 1–44.
Cranston, G. R. & Hammond, G. P. (2010). North and south: regional footprints on the transition pathway towards a low carbon, global economy. Applied Energy, 87 (9): 2945–2951.
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302: 1907–1912.
Easterling, D. R., Meehl, G. A., Parmesan, C., et al. (2000). Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science, 289: 2068–2074.
Geden, O. (2015). Environment: climate stalemate. Nature, 526: 194.
Geels, F. W., Berkhout, F. & Vuuren, D. P. V. (2016). Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions. Nature Climate Change, 6 (6): 576–583.
Gracceva, F. & Zeniewski, P. (2014). A systemic approach to assessing energy security in a low-carbon EUenergy system. Applied Energy, 123 (12): 335–348.
Gu, J. & Tang, X. (2005). Meta-synthesis approach to complex system modeling. European Journal of Operational Research, 166 (3): 597–614.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162: 1243–1248.
Hardin, G. (1998). Extensions of “the tragedy of the commons”. Science, 280: 682–683.
Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35 (4): 519–530.
Heller, M. A. (1998). The tragedy of the anticommons: property in the transition from Marx to markets. Harvard Law Review, 111 (3): 621–688.
Heylighen, F. & Joslyn, C. (2003). Cybernetics and second-order cybernetics. Encyclopedia of Physical Science & Technology, 155-169.
[17] IPCC. (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Janssen, M. A., Holahan, R., Lee, A. & Ostrom, E. (2010). Lab experiments for the study of social-ecological systems. Science, 328: 613–617.
Jorgenson, A. K. (2014). Economic development and the carbon intensity of human well-being. Nature Climate Change, 4 (3): 186–189.
Liu, Z., Guan, D., Crawford-Brown, D., et al. (2013). Energy policy: a low-carbon road map for China. Nature, 500: 143–145.
Milinski, M., Semmann, D. & Krambeck, H. J. (2002). Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’. Nature, 415: 424–426.
Mulugetta, Y. & Urban, F. (2010). Deliberating on low carbon development. Energy Policy, 38 (12): 7546–7549.
Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., et al. (1999). Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284: 278–282.
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325: 419–422.
Ostrom, E. (2014). A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Annals of Economics and Finance, 15: 97–134.
Overpeck, J. T., Meehl, G. A., Bony, S. & Easterling, D. R. (2011). Climate data challenges in the 21st century. Science, 331: 700–702.
Patz, J. A., Campbelllendrum, D., Holloway, T. & Foley, J. A. (2005). Impact of regional climate change on human health. Nature, 438: 310–317.
Posner, E. A. & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Climate change justice. Georgetown Law Journal, 96 (4): 1565–1612.
Rand, D. G. & Nowak, M. A. (2009). Positive interactions promote public cooperation. Science, 325: 1272–1275.
Rogelj, J., Elzen, M. D., Höhne, N., et al. (2016). Paris agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature, 534: 631–639.
Sandler, T. (2004). Global Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Skea, J. & Nishioka, S. (2008). Policies and practices for a low-carbon society. Climate Policy, 8: 5–16.
Thompson, T. M., Rausch, S., Saari, R. K. & Selin, N. E. (2014). A systems approach to evaluating the air quality co-benefits of UScarbon policies. Nature Climate Change, 4 (10): 917–923.
Trumpy, E., Botteghi, S., Caiozzi, F., et al. (2016). Geothermal potential assessment for a low carbon strategy: a new systematic approach applied in southern Italy. Energy, 103: 167–181.
Urban, M. C. (2015). Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science, 348: 571–573.
Wiener N. (1948). Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. M.I.T. Press.
Xu, J. P., Yao, L. M. & Lu, Y. (2014). Innovative Approaches towards Low Carbon Economics: Regional Development Cybernetics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the Major Bidding Program of National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 12&ZD217), the Program of the Social Science Foundation of Sichuan (Grant No. SC16C010), and the Research Funding of Sichuan University (Grant No. skqy201640; 2016SCU11036). The authors thank the editor and the anonymous referees whose comments and suggestions have significantly improved the quality of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Yi Lu is an associate professor in Sichuan University. He obtained his Ph.D. in technical economics and management from Sichuan University in 2012. Dr. Lu is the Vice Director in Institute of Emergency Management and Reconstruction in Post-disaster of Sichuan University. He is also a researcher in Engineering Research Center of Low Carbon Technology and Economy of Sichuan University. His research interests focus on low-carbon development and post-disaster reconstruction.
Jiuping Xu is a professor in Sichuan University. He obtained his Ph.D. of applied mathematics from Tsinghua University, Beijing, China; and Ph.D. of physical chemistry from Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, in 1995 and 1999, respectively. Prof. Xu has been appointed as an Academician of the International Academy of Systems and Cybernetic Sciences since 2010. He is the Honorary Academician of Academy of Sciences of Moldova, and the Foreign Academician of Mongolian National Academy of Sciences. He has published over 40 books by Springer, Taylor & Francis, and over 400 international peer-reviewed journal papers in areas of uncertainty decision making, systems engineering, economic theorem, and information science. His current research interests include low carbon economics, uncertainty decision making, and complex systems with applications.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, Y., Xu, J. Cybernetic paradigm based innovative approaches towards coping with climate change. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 26, 359–382 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-017-5339-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-017-5339-3