Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cybernetic paradigm based innovative approaches towards coping with climate change

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing carbon emissions from large-scale human activities have contributed to global climate change, which has resulted in an increase in significant human crises. Therefore, as carbon abatement is a public good, coping with climate change is also a public-good; however, it suffers from many free-rider incentives, leading to a tragedy of the commons. Overcoming this challenge from a systemic perspective, requires that all sectors such as industry, government, and citizens on global, national, and regional levels engage in low-carbon development and the implementation of fair and efficient climate policies. Through a theoretical exploration of carbon abatement and a systemic description of low-carbon systems, this paper developed a cybernetic framework for coping with climate change, which consists of a cloud platform for data analysis, meta-synthetic engineering for decision support, a polycentric approach to extensive consultation and various functional goal achievement modules. On this basis, by combining the “invisible hand” and “visible hand” and by integrating negotiation at the global level, cooperation at the national level and knowledge at the local level, a multilevel policymaking model is proposed to address complex climate change problems. This cybernetic paradigm based innovative approach could provide valuable illumination to stakeholders seeking to cope with climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnold, C. A. (2002). The reconstitution of property: Property as a web of interests. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 26 (2): 281–364.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boyd, R. & Ibarrarán, M. E. (2002). Costs of compliance with the Kyoto Protocol: a developing country perspective. Energy Economics, 24(1): 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clemson, B. (1984). Cybernetics: A New Management Tool. Abacus Press, Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3: 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cranston, G. R. & Hammond, G. P. (2010). North and south: regional footprints on the transition pathway towards a low carbon, global economy. Applied Energy, 87 (9): 2945–2951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302: 1907–1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Easterling, D. R., Meehl, G. A., Parmesan, C., et al. (2000). Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science, 289: 2068–2074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Geden, O. (2015). Environment: climate stalemate. Nature, 526: 194.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Geels, F. W., Berkhout, F. & Vuuren, D. P. V. (2016). Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions. Nature Climate Change, 6 (6): 576–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gracceva, F. & Zeniewski, P. (2014). A systemic approach to assessing energy security in a low-carbon EUenergy system. Applied Energy, 123 (12): 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gu, J. & Tang, X. (2005). Meta-synthesis approach to complex system modeling. European Journal of Operational Research, 166 (3): 597–614.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162: 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hardin, G. (1998). Extensions of “the tragedy of the commons”. Science, 280: 682–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35 (4): 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heller, M. A. (1998). The tragedy of the anticommons: property in the transition from Marx to markets. Harvard Law Review, 111 (3): 621–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heylighen, F. & Joslyn, C. (2003). Cybernetics and second-order cybernetics. Encyclopedia of Physical Science & Technology, 155-169.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. [17] IPCC. (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Janssen, M. A., Holahan, R., Lee, A. & Ostrom, E. (2010). Lab experiments for the study of social-ecological systems. Science, 328: 613–617.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Jorgenson, A. K. (2014). Economic development and the carbon intensity of human well-being. Nature Climate Change, 4 (3): 186–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, Z., Guan, D., Crawford-Brown, D., et al. (2013). Energy policy: a low-carbon road map for China. Nature, 500: 143–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Milinski, M., Semmann, D. & Krambeck, H. J. (2002). Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’. Nature, 415: 424–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mulugetta, Y. & Urban, F. (2010). Deliberating on low carbon development. Energy Policy, 38 (12): 7546–7549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., et al. (1999). Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284: 278–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325: 419–422.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Ostrom, E. (2014). A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Annals of Economics and Finance, 15: 97–134.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Overpeck, J. T., Meehl, G. A., Bony, S. & Easterling, D. R. (2011). Climate data challenges in the 21st century. Science, 331: 700–702.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Patz, J. A., Campbelllendrum, D., Holloway, T. & Foley, J. A. (2005). Impact of regional climate change on human health. Nature, 438: 310–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Posner, E. A. & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Climate change justice. Georgetown Law Journal, 96 (4): 1565–1612.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rand, D. G. & Nowak, M. A. (2009). Positive interactions promote public cooperation. Science, 325: 1272–1275.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Rogelj, J., Elzen, M. D., Höhne, N., et al. (2016). Paris agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature, 534: 631–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sandler, T. (2004). Global Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Skea, J. & Nishioka, S. (2008). Policies and practices for a low-carbon society. Climate Policy, 8: 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Thompson, T. M., Rausch, S., Saari, R. K. & Selin, N. E. (2014). A systems approach to evaluating the air quality co-benefits of UScarbon policies. Nature Climate Change, 4 (10): 917–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Trumpy, E., Botteghi, S., Caiozzi, F., et al. (2016). Geothermal potential assessment for a low carbon strategy: a new systematic approach applied in southern Italy. Energy, 103: 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Urban, M. C. (2015). Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science, 348: 571–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wiener N. (1948). Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Xu, J. P., Yao, L. M. & Lu, Y. (2014). Innovative Approaches towards Low Carbon Economics: Regional Development Cybernetics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Major Bidding Program of National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 12&ZD217), the Program of the Social Science Foundation of Sichuan (Grant No. SC16C010), and the Research Funding of Sichuan University (Grant No. skqy201640; 2016SCU11036). The authors thank the editor and the anonymous referees whose comments and suggestions have significantly improved the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Uncertainty Decision-making Laboratory, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, China

    Yi Lu & Jiuping Xu

  2. Engineering Research Center of Low Carbon Technology and Economy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, China

    Jiuping Xu

Authors
  1. Yi Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiuping Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiuping Xu.

Additional information

Yi Lu is an associate professor in Sichuan University. He obtained his Ph.D. in technical economics and management from Sichuan University in 2012. Dr. Lu is the Vice Director in Institute of Emergency Management and Reconstruction in Post-disaster of Sichuan University. He is also a researcher in Engineering Research Center of Low Carbon Technology and Economy of Sichuan University. His research interests focus on low-carbon development and post-disaster reconstruction.

Jiuping Xu is a professor in Sichuan University. He obtained his Ph.D. of applied mathematics from Tsinghua University, Beijing, China; and Ph.D. of physical chemistry from Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, in 1995 and 1999, respectively. Prof. Xu has been appointed as an Academician of the International Academy of Systems and Cybernetic Sciences since 2010. He is the Honorary Academician of Academy of Sciences of Moldova, and the Foreign Academician of Mongolian National Academy of Sciences. He has published over 40 books by Springer, Taylor & Francis, and over 400 international peer-reviewed journal papers in areas of uncertainty decision making, systems engineering, economic theorem, and information science. His current research interests include low carbon economics, uncertainty decision making, and complex systems with applications.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, Y., Xu, J. Cybernetic paradigm based innovative approaches towards coping with climate change. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 26, 359–382 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-017-5339-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-017-5339-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation