Societal problems more complex than presumed: The Compram methodology

Article
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

Complex societal problems are often wrongly addressed by politicians as mono-disciplinary, relatively easy to solve problems. By directly jumping to conclusions politicians overlook the complexity of the problems in their decision making process. Complex societal problems are generally interdisciplinary problems and should be addressed in a multi-disciplinary way considering the multiple actors and their interactions, the many variables involved, as well as the emotions that the problems provokes. These many interactions are the cause of the complexity of the problem handling process. It is high time that complex societal problems are addressed by the politicians in the right way using the methodology, methods and tools of the field of Methodology of Societal Complexity so the problems can be handled in an adequate, transparent, efficient and proper way, mitigating the damage the problems are causing. The field of Methodology of Societal Complexity developed ways to guide the problem handling process of complex societal problems for analysing, decision making and implementing interventions in an adequate, democratic and efficient way. The Compram methodology is a major methodology in this field and directs in a structured, democratic, and efficient way, the problem handling process of complex societal problems by using a multi-disciplinary, multi actor approach including emotional aspects. The OECD (2006) advised governments to handle complex societal problems that threaten global safety according to the Compram methodology. The universities should include issues of the field of Societal Complexity into their disciplines so that future managers are aware how complex societal problems should be handled.

Keywords

Societal complexity Compram methodology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We like to thank the referees for their help to improve the quality of the paper.

References

  1. [1]
    Ackoff, R. L. (1978). The Art of Problem Solving. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Apeldoornse Courant (2008). Toeristen gedood door lawines in Oostenrijk. December 22, 2008 Wegener Nieuwsmedia BV.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Blokker, B & Chorus, J. (2015). Verhuizen naar Europa. Amsterdam: NRC Handelsblad 14-15 November 2015.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    De Telegraaf (2008). Lawinerisico in Oostenrijk stijgt. December 22, 2008. Amsterdam: De Telegraaf.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    De Volkskrant (2013). Fukushima lekt per dag 300 ton vervuild water in oceaan. Redactie 07/08/13, Reuters (Fukushima leaks 300 ton radioactive water a day into the ocean). (De Volkskrant is a daily quality newspaper).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    DeTombe, D. J. (1994). Defining complex interdisciplinary societal problems: a theoretical study for constructing a cooperative problem analyzing method: the method COMPRAM. Amsterdam: Thesis publishers Amsterdam (dissertation), 439 pp. ISBN 90 5170 302-3.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    DeTombe, D.J. (1992a). Using a simulation tool for defining global problems. ISAGA’91; 22nd Annual International Conference of the International Simulation and Gaming Association. Kyoto, Japan (abstract) (published as Tombe de, D.J.).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    DeTombe, D.J. (1992b). Chaos en epidemiologische scenarios: het aids scenario. Onzekerheden in de voorspelling van de Aids epidemie (Dutch) pp. 126-137. In Dijkum van, C. & D. J. DeTombe (red.) (1992) Gamma Chaos. Onzekerheid en orde in de menswetenschappen. Bloemendaal: Aramith uitgevers. ISBN 90-68341057 (published as Tombe de, D.J.).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    DeTombe, Dorien (2015). Handling Societal Complexity: A Study of the Theory and the Methodology of Societal Complexity and the COMPRAM Methodology. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. ISBN/EAN 978-3-662-43916-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    DeTombe, Dorien J. (1999). Moments of support by a groupware brainstorming tool in handling complex technical policy problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 119(2): 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    DeTombe, Dorien J. (2001a). Compram, a method for handling complex societal problems. European Journal of Operation Research, 128(2): 266–282.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    DeTombe, Dorien J. (2001b). Introduction to the field of methodology for handling complex societal problem. European Journal of Operation Research, 128(2): 231–232.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    DeTombe, Dorien J. (2001c). Compram a policy making method for prevention of floods. Proceedings Tiems Conference 2001, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    DeTombe, Dorien J. (2014). War time rape as a complex societal problem using the Compram methodology. In: VanDijkum, C. & Dorien DeTombe (eds.), International Scientific Journal of Methods and Models of Complexity (ISJM&MC), Interdisciplinary Journal for Research of Complexity. Published on Internet. Amsterdam: Siswo. July 2014 ISSN-0928-3137.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Forrester, J. W. (1987). Lessons from system dynamics modeling. System Dynamics Review, 3(2):136–149.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Forrester, J. W. (1990). System dynamics as a foundation for pre-college education. In: D. F. Anderson, G.P. Richardson & J.D. Sterman (eds.), System Dynamics ’90, pp. 367–381. Boston, MA: The System Dynamics Society.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Geyer, F. & J. van der Zouwen (1986) Socio-Cybernetic Paradoxes. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Gu, J. (2015). Meta-synthesis system approach and its applications in China. Lecture Sichuan University, Chengdu, October 2015.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Hart, ’t, H. (1991). Onderzoek en Praktijkfasen. Vakgroep Ontwikkeling en Socialisatie, Sektie Methoden, Utrecht. In Dijk, J. van, M. de Goede, H. ’t Hart & J. Teunissen Onderzoeken en veranderen: Methoden van praktijkonderzoek. Leiden: Stenfert Kroese.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Cao, L. B. (2015). Metasynthetic Computing and Engineering of Complex Systems. London: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. (1972b). The Theory of Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.MATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    OECD (2006). The Final Consensus Report of the OECD Global Science Forum Workshop Tokyo, Japan, on December 5-6, 2005. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Qian, X., Yu, J. & Dai R. (1990). A new scientific field open-complex giant systems and methodology (in Chinese). Chin. J. Nat. 13(1): 3–10 (The meta-synthesis system approach).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Shilts, R. (1986). And the Band Played on. Politics, People and the AIDS Epidemic. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Shilts, R. (1987). The Plague. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    VanDijkum, C. (1992). Het onderzoek van chaos. In VanDijkum, C. & D. J. de Tombe (red.) (1992b), Gamma Chaos. Onzekerheid en orde in de menswetenschappen. pp. 21-35. Bloemendaal: Aramith uitgevers, ISBN 90-68341057.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Research Society on Methodology of Societal ComplexityAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Sichuan UniversityChengduP.R. China

Personalised recommendations