Skip to main content
Log in

The Sputnik of servgoods: Autonomous vehicles

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an earlier paper (Tien 2015), the author defined the concept of a servgood, which can be thought of as a physical good or product enveloped by a services-oriented layer that makes the good smarter or more adaptable and customizable for a particular use. Adding another layer of physical sensors could then enhance its smartness and intelligence, especially if it were to be connected with each other or with other servgoods through the Internet of Things. Such sensed servgoods are becoming the products of the future. Indeed, autonomous vehicles can be considered the exemplar servgoods of the future; it is about decision informatics and embraces the advanced technologies of sensing (i.e., Big Data), processing (i.e., real-time analytics), reacting (i.e., real-time decision-making), and learning (i.e., deep learning). Since autonomous vehicles constitute a huge quality-of-life disruption, it is also critical to consider its policy impact on privacy and security, regulations and standards, and liability and insurance. Finally, just as the Soviet Union inaugurated the space age on October 4, 1957, with the launch of Sputnik, the first man-made object to orbit the Earth, the U. S. has inaugurated an age of automata or autonomous vehicles that can be considered to be the U. S. Sputnik of servgoods, with the full support of the U. S. government, the U. S. auto industry, the U. S. electronic industry, and the U.S. higher educational enterprise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, J. M., Kalra, N., Stanley, K. D., Sorenson, P., Samaras, C. & Oluwatola, O. A. (2014). Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Guide for Policymakers. The RAND Corporation Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews, J. G., Buzzi, S., Choi, W., Hanly, S., Lozano, A., Soong, A.C.K. & Zhang, J. (2014). What will 5G be?. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(6): 1065–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bifet, A. (2013). Mining big data in real time. Informatica, 37: 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buehler, M., Iagnemma, K. & Singh, S. (2010). The DARPA urban challenge: autonomous vehicles in city traffic. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics Series, Vol. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burns, L. D. (2013). Sustainable mobility: a vision of our transport future. Nature, 497: 181–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carr, N. (2010). The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. Norton, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Federal Communications Commission (FCC 1999). FCC allocates spectrum in 5.9 GHz range for intelligent transportation systems uses. Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fernandez, P. & Nunes, U. (2012). Platooning with IVC-enabled autonomous vehicles: strategies to mitigate communication delays, improve safety and traffic flow. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13: 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. General Motors (1939). Futurama: Highways and Horizons. New York’s World Fair, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hattori, H., Nakajima, Y. & Ishida, T. (2011). Learning from humans: agent modeling with individual human behaviors. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics–Part A, 41(1): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Joint Program Office (2013). Connected vehicle research in the United States. Washington, D. C., August 23.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lavalle, S., Lesser, E., Shockley, R., Hopkins, M.S. & Kruschwitz, N. (2011). Big data, analytics and the path from insights to value. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2): 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Brown, B., Dobbs, R., Roxbury, C. & Byers, A. H. (2011). Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marchant, G. E. & Lindor, R. A. (2012). The coming collision between autonomous vehicles and the liability system. Santa Clara Law Review, 52: 1321–1340.

    Google Scholar 

  15. MIT (2014). The 50 smartest companies in 2014. MIT Technology Review, 117(2): 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  16. MIT (2016). 10 breakthrough technologies in 2016. MIT Technology Review, 119(2): 34–67.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miller, J. M. (2015). Autonomous vehicles: implications for employment demand. The Bridge, 45(4): 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mlodinow, L. (2012). Subliminal: How Your Unconscious Mind Rules Your Behavior. Pantheon Books, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  19. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2013). U. S. Department of Transportation Releases Policy on Automated Vehicle Development: Policy 14-13. Washington, DC: NHTSA.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Perry, T. (2015). Temporary tattoos can replace today’s biomedical sensors. IEEE Spectrum: 34-39; 84–85.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Porter, M. E. & Heppelmann (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 102(1): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rappaport, T. S., Heath, R. W., Daniels, R.C. & Murdock, J. N. (2014). Millimeter Wave Wireless Communications. Prentice Hall: Prentice Hall Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Roesner, F. (2015). Computer security and privacy: where human factors meet engineering. The Bridge: 43(4): 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ross, P. E. (2015). Diabetes has a new enemy: robo-pancreas. IEEE Spectrum: 40-43; 87.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Siegel, E. (2013). Predictive Analytics: The Power to Predict Who Will Click, Buy, Lie, or Die. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., Van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., Dieleman, S., Grewe, D., Nham, J., Kalchbrenner, N., Sutskever, I., Lillicrap, T., Leach, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Graepel, T. & Hassabis, D. (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529: 484–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Taleb, N.N. (2010). The Black Swan: Second Edition. Random House, Inc., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tien, J.M. (2003). Toward a decision informatics paradigm: a real-time information based approach to decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C–Special Issue, 33(1): 102–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tien, J.M. (2005). Viewing urban disruptions from a decision informatics perspective. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 14(3): 257–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tien, J.M. (2011). Manufacturing and services: from mass production to mass customization. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 20(2): 129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tien, J.M. (2012). The next industrial revolution: integrated services and goods. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 21(3): 257–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tien, J.M. (2014). Overview of big data: a US perspective. The Bridge, 44(4): 12–19.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Tien, J. M. (2015). Internet of connected servgoods: considerations, consequences and concerns. Journal of Systems Engineering, 24(2): 130–167.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tien, J.M. & Berg, D. (2003). A case for service systems engineering. Journal of Systems Engineering, 12(1): 13–39.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tien, J.M. & Cahn, M.F. (1981). An Evaluation of the Wilmington Management of Demand Program. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zikopoulos, P.C., Eaton, C., DeRoos, D., Deutsch, T. & Lapis, G. (2012). Understanding Big Data: Analytics for Enterprise Class Hadoop and Streaming Data. The McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zmud, J., Ecola, L., Phleps, P., & Feige, I. (2013). The future of mobility: scenarios for the United States in 2030. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James M. Tien.

Additional information

James M. Tien received the BEE from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) and the SM, EE and PhD from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He has held leadership positions at Bell Telephone Laboratories, at the Rand Corporation, and at Structured Decisions Corporation. He joined the Department of Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering at RPI in 1977, became Acting Chair of the department, joined a unique interdisciplinary Department of Decision Sciences and Engineering Systems as its founding Chair, and twice served as the Acting Dean of Engineering. In 2007, he was recruited by the University of Miami to be a Distinguished Professor and Dean of its College of Engineering; effective 2016, he stepped down from the Dean’s position and remains `a Distinguished Professor. He has been awarded the IEEE Joseph G. Wohl Outstanding Career Award, the IEEE Major Educational Innovation Award, the IEEE Norbert Wiener Award, and the IBM Faculty Award. He is also an elected member of the prestigious U. S. National Academy of Engineering.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tien, J.M. The Sputnik of servgoods: Autonomous vehicles. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 26, 133–162 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-016-5325-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-016-5325-1

Keywords

Navigation