Risk reduction in a project portfolio
The positive impacts of managing projects as a portfolio are quantified by comparing the value of the integrated risk of a project portfolio and the aggregation of single project risks implemented separately. Firstly, the integrated risk is defined by proposing risky events based on set theory. Secondly, as projects interact with each other in a project portfolio, the integrated risk is evaluated by using a Bayesian network structure learning algorithm to construct an interdependent network of risks. Finally, the integrated risk of a practical case is assessed using this method, and the results show that the proposed method is an effective tool for calculating the extent of risk reduction of implementing a project portfolio and identifying the most risky project, so as to assist companies in making comprehensive decisions in the phase of portfolio selection and portfolio controlling.
KeywordsProject portfolio integrated risk set theory Bayesian network risk assessment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees who provided thoughtful comments and suggestions which improved the quality of their paper. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71272049 & No. 71402142), Ph.D. Programs Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 20126102110052), and Humanities, Social Science and Management Research Fund of Northwestern Polytechnical University (Grant No. 2014RW0008).
- Gallati, R. (2003). Risk Management and Capital Adequacy. McGraw Hill Professional, New York.Google Scholar
- Guan, D.J. & Guo, P. (2014). Relationship classification of project portfolio based on the measurement of interaction effects and their influences. Soft Science, 28 (10): 125–129.Google Scholar
- Guan, D.J., Hipel, K.W., Fang, L. & Guo, P. (2014). Assessing project portfolio risk based on Bayesian network. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: 1546-1551, San Diego, California, USA, October 5-8, 2014, IEEE.Google Scholar
- Guo, N. & Yu, S. (2013). Risk and uncertainty in project portfolio management. International Conference on Information Engineering and Applications, 3: 815–822, 2012. Springer, London.Google Scholar
- Jensen, F.V. (1996). An Introduction to Bayesian Networks. UCL Press, London.Google Scholar
- Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7 (1): 77–91.Google Scholar
- McFarlan, F.W. (1981). Portfolio approach to information systems. Harvard Business Review, 59 (5): 142–150.Google Scholar
- Pennypacker, J.S. & Dye L.D. (2002). Project portfolio management and managing multiple projects: two sides of the same coin. Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium: 1-10, Houston, Texas, USA, September 7-16, 2000, Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
- PMI (Project Management Institute) (2008). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (4th ed.). Newtown Square, PA.Google Scholar
- Wang, S.Y. (1997). The development of microelectronics technology: the concept of “critical mass” and reform competition. China High Technology Enterprises, 1: 5–9.Google Scholar
- Zhao, J., Guo, P. & Pan, N.Z. (2011). Risk measurement and selection optimization of project portfolio based on the interaction effect. Operations Research and Management Science, 20 (6): 120–126.Google Scholar