A new parameter tuning approach for enhanced motor imagery EEG signal classification
- 171 Downloads
A brain-computer interface (BCI) system allows direct communication between the brain and the external world. Common spatial pattern (CSP) has been used effectively for feature extraction of data used in BCI systems. However, many studies show that the performance of a BCI system using CSP largely depends on the filter parameters. The filter parameters that yield most discriminating information vary from subject to subject and manually tuning of the filter parameters is a difficult and time-consuming exercise. In this paper, we propose a new automated filter tuning approach for motor imagery electroencephalography (EEG) signal classification, which automatically and flexibly finds the filter parameters for optimal performance. We have evaluated the performance of our proposed method on two public benchmark datasets. Compared to the existing conventional CSP approach, our method reduces the average classification error rate by 2.89% and 3.61% for BCI Competition III dataset IVa and BCI Competition IV dataset I, respectively. Moreover, our proposed approach also achieved lowest average classification error rate compared to state-of-the-art methods studied in this paper. Thus, our proposed method can be potentially used for developing improved BCI systems, which can assist people with disabilities to recover their environmental control. It can also be used for enhanced disease recognition such as epileptic seizure detection using EEG signals.
KeywordsBrain-computer interface (BCI) Filter tuning Genetic algorithm (GA) Motor imagery (MI) Temporal filters
Special thanks to the editors and anonymous reviewers for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions that helped improve our manuscript.
This work was supported by the Faculty Research Committee of the University of the South Pacific, Laboratory for Medical Science Mathematics, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan, and College Research Committee of Fiji National University.
- 1.Akram F, Metwally MK, Hee-Sok H, Hyun-Jae J, Tae-Seong K (2013) A novel P300-based BCI system for words typing. In: 2013 International Winter Workshop on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI). pp 24–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IWW-BCI.2013.6506617
- 3.Ang KK, Chin ZY, Zhang H, Guan C (2008) Filter bank common spatial pattern (FBCSP) in brain-computer interface. In: IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks pp 2390–2397. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2008.4634130
- 5.Cincotti F, Mattia D, Aloise F, Bufalari S, Schalk G, Oriolo G, Cherubini A, Marciani MG, Babiloni F (2008) Non-invasive brain–computer interface system: towards its application as assistive technology. Brain Res Bull 75:796–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.01.007 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 10.Karaboga D (2005) An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical Report TR06: Erciyes UniversityGoogle Scholar
- 11.Kirmizi-Alsan E, Bayraktaroglu Z, Gurvit H, Keskin YH, Emre M, Demiralp T (2006) Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention. Brain Res 1104:114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kleih SC, Kuafmann T, Zickler C et al (2011) Out of the frying pan into the fire-the P300-based BCI faces real-world challenges. Prog Brain Res 194:27–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53815-4.00019-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Kumar S, Sharma A, Mamun K, Tsunoda T (2016) A Deep learning approach for motor imagery EEG signal classification. In: 3rd Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/APWC-on-CSE.2016.017
- 17.Kumar S, Sharma R, Sharma A, Tsunoda T (2016) Decimation filter with common spatial pattern and fishers discriminant analysis for motor imagery classification. In: IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2016.7727457
- 18.La Rocca D, Campisi P, Sole-Casals J (2013) EEG based user recognition using BUMP modelling. In: International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG). pp 1–12Google Scholar
- 23.Naveen, R.S., and Julian, A. (2013). Brain computing interface for wheel chair control. In: Fourth International Conference on Computing, Communications and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT). pp 1–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT.2013.6726572
- 25.Novi Q, Cuntai G, Dat TH, Ping X (2007) Sub-band common spatial pattern (SBCSP) for brain-computer interface. In: 3rd International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering. pp 204–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CNE.2007.369647
- 28.Ramesh S, Krishna MG, Nakirekanti M (2014) Brain computer interface system for mind controlled robot using Bluetooth. Int J Comput Appl 104:20–23Google Scholar
- 50.Widmann A, Schröger E (2012) Filter effects and filter artifacts in the analysis of electrophysiological data. Front Psychol 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00233