Factor Structure and Internal Consistency of a Spanish Version of the Family Quality of Life (FaQoL)

  • Pau García-Grau
  • R. A. McWilliam
  • Gabriel Martínez-Rico
  • María D. Grau-Sevilla
Article
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

This study examines the factor structure and internal consistency of the Spanish version of the Family Quality of Life scale (FaQoL). After translating and back-translating the instrument, we administered it to 324 families with a child with disabilities or developmental delays or who was at risk and who was enrolled in an early intervention (EI) program. Families were recruited from EI services in Spain, from 12 autonomous communities. Children’s average age was 38.6 months. Results showed the FaQoL scores had high internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis showed an adequate fit with the original factors, even slightly higher than the original four-factor solution. These results allow factors scores to be used reliably with Spanish families.

Keywords

Family quality of life Early intervention Child functioning Spanish families Evaluation 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Andolfi, M. (1984). Terapia familiar. Un enfoque interaccional. España: Paidós.Google Scholar
  2. Aznar, A. S., & Castañón, D. G. (2005). Quality of life from the point of view of Latin American families: A participative research study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 784–788. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00752.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, D., Scarborough, A., & Hebbler, K. (2003). National early intervention longitudinal study: Families’ first experiences with early intervention. Retrieved July, 24, 2003 Retrieved from https://www.sri.com/sites/default/files/publications/neils_report_2.pdf.Google Scholar
  4. Balcells-Balcells, A., Giné, C., Guàrdia-Olmos, J., & Summers, J. A. (2011). Family quality of life: Adaptation to Spanish population of several family support questionnaires. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55, 1151–1163. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01350.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernheimer, L. P., & Keogh, B. K. (1995). Weaving interventions into the fabric of everyday life: an approach to family assessment. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 15(4), 415–433.Google Scholar
  6. Bess, F. H., Dodd-Murphy, J., & Parker, R. A. (1998). Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: Prevalence, educational performance, and functional status. Ear & Hearing, 9, 339–354. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199810000-00001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blackman, J. A. (2002). Early intervention: A global perspective. Infants & Young Children, 15, 11–19. doi: 10.1097/00001163-200210000-00004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, Massachussetts: Harvard University Press. doi: 10.1080/00131728109336000.Google Scholar
  9. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 733–742. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1987). La ecología del desarrollo humano. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, I., & Brown, R. (2004). Concepts for beginning study in family quality of life. In A. P. Turnbull, I. Brown, & H. R. Turnbull (Eds.), Families and people with mental retardation and quality of life: International perspectives (pp. 25–49). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, I., Neikrug, S., & Brown, R. I. (2000). Family quality of life survey. International Family Quality of Life Project: Australia, Canada, Israel.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, I., Brown, R. I., Baum, N. T., Isaacs, B. J., Myerscough, T., Neikrug, S., & Wang, M. (2006). Family quality of life survey: Main caregivers of people with intellectual or developmental disabilities. Toronto, Canada: Surrey Place Centre.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, D.T., Stanley, J.C., & Gage, N.L. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research: Houghton Mifflin Boston.Google Scholar
  15. Carter, B., & McGoldrick, M. (1989). The changing family life cycle: Framework for family therapy. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  16. Chiu, C., Kyzar, K., Zuna, N., Turnbull, A., Summers, J. A., & Gomez, V. A. (2013). Family quality of life. In M. L. Whemeyer (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability (pp. 365–392). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Comrey, A. L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York: Academic Press. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1993.10485363.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, K., & Gavidia-Payne, S. (2009). The impact of child, family, and professional support characteristics on the quality of life in families of young children with disabilities. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 34, 153–162. doi: 10.1080/13668250902874608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis, A., & Hind, S. (1999). The impact of hearing impairment: A global health problem. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 49, S51–S54. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5876(99)00213-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunst, C. J. (2000). Revisiting “rethinking early intervention”. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 20, 95–104.Google Scholar
  21. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Giné, C., Vilaseca, R., Gràcia, M., Mora, J., Orcasitas, J. R., Simón, C., Torrecillas, A. M., Beltran, F. S., Dalmau, M., Pro, M. T., Balcells-Balcells, A., Mas, J. M., Adam-Alcocer, A. L., & Simó-Pinatella, D. (2013). Spanish family quality of life scales: Under and over 18 years old. Journal of intelectual & developmental disability, 38, 141–148. doi: 10.3109/13668250.2013.774324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gràcia, M., Vilaseca, R., Balcells, A., Simó, D., & Salvador, F. (2010). Family quality of life-scale (FQL-S) (younger and older than 18 years old). In Presented at the third IASSID-Europe conference: Integrating biomedical and psycho-social-educational perspectives de la International Association for the Scientific Study of intellectual disabilities (IASSID). Rome: Italy.Google Scholar
  25. Guralnick, M. J. (2001). A developmental systems model for early intervention. Infants and Young Children, 14(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
  26. Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & S. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3–38). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  27. Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hoffman, L., Marquis, J., Poston, D., Summers, J. A., & Turnbull, A. (2006). Assessing family outcomes: Psychometric evaluation of the Beach Center family quality of life scale. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1069–1083. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00314.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Isaacs, B. J., Brown, I., Brown, R. I., Baum, N., Myerscough, T., Neikrug, S., & Wang, M. (2007). The international family quality of life project: Goals and description of a survey tool. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 4, 177–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-1130.2007.00116.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jackson, C. W., & Turnbull, A. (2004). Impact of deafness on family life a review of the literature. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 24(1), 15–29.Google Scholar
  31. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 35, 401–415. doi: 10.1007/BF02291575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leal, L. (1999). A family-centered approach to people with mental retardation. Washington: American Association on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
  33. McWilliam, R. A. (2010). In Ed (Ed.), Working with families of young children with special needs. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  34. McWilliam, R. A., & Casey, A. M. (2013). Factor analysis of family quality of life (FaQoL). Nashville: Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  35. McWilliam, R. A., Tocci, L., & Harbin, G. L. (1998). Family-centered services: Service providers’ discourse and behavior. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 18, 206–221. doi: 10.1177/027112149801800404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Muñiz, J., & Hambleton, R. K. (2000). Adaptación de los test de unas culturas a otras. Metodología de las Ciencias del comportamiento, 2, 129–149.Google Scholar
  37. Palacios, J., & Rodrigo, M. J. (1998): La familia como contexto de desarrollo humano. In M. J. Rodrigo & J. Palacios (Eds.), Familia y desarrollo humano (pp. 25–44) Madrid, Alianza.Google Scholar
  38. Park, J., Turnbull, A. P., & Turnbull, H. R. (2002). Impacts of poverty on families of children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 68, 151–170. doi: 10.1177/001440290206800201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Park, J., Hoffman, L., Marquis, J., Turnbull, A., Poston, D., Mannan, H., & Nelson, L. (2003). Toward assessing family outcomes of service delivery: Validation of a family quality of life survey. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47, 367–384. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00497.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Perpiñán, S. (2009). Atención Temprana y familia. Cómo intervenir creando entornos competentes. Madrid: Narcea.Google Scholar
  41. Sameroff, A. J. (1983). Development systems: contexts and evolution. In P. H. Mussen, (E.d.), Handbook of child psychology: formerly Carmichael’s Manual of child psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Sameroff, A. (2009). The transactional model of development: How children and contexts shape each other. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  43. Schalock, R., & Verdugo, M. (2002). The concept of quality of life in human services: A handbook for human service practitioners. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
  44. Schalock, R. L., Gardner, J. F. & Bradley, V. J. (2007). Quality of life for people with intellectual and other developmental disabilities: Applications across individuals, organizations, communities, and systems. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.Google Scholar
  45. Shonkoff, J. P., & Meisels, S. J. (2000). Handbook of early childhood intervention, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511529320.Google Scholar
  46. Summers, J. A., Poston, D. J., Turnbull, A. P., Marquis, J., Hoffman, L., Mannan, H., & Wang, M. (2005). Conceptualizing and measuring family quality of life. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 777–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00751.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics, 2° Ed. Northridge, California: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Tomás, J. M., Sancho, P., Melendez, J. C., & Mayordomo, T. (2012). Resilience and coping as predictors of general well-being in the elderly: A structural equation modeling approach. Aging & Mental Health, 16, 317–326. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.615737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Trivette, C.M., Dunst, C.J., & Deal, A. G. (1997). Resource-based approach to early intervention. Contexts of early intervention: Systems and settings, 73-92.Google Scholar
  50. Verdugo, M. A., Córdoba, I., & Gómez, J. (2006). Adaptación y validación al español de la escala de calidad de vida familiar (eCVF). Siglo cero, 37(2), 41–48.Google Scholar
  51. Wang, M., Turnbull, A. P., Summers, J. A., Little, T. D., Poston, D. J., Mannan, H., & Turnbull, R. (2004). Severity of disability and income as predictors of parents' satisfaction with their family quality of life during early childhood years. Research & Practice for persons with severe disabilities, 29, 82–94. doi: 10.2511/rpsd.29.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Waterson, P., Griffiths, P., Stride, C., Murphy, J., & Hignett, S. (2010). Psychometric properties of the hospital survey on patient safety culture: Findings from the UK. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19(5), e2–e2.Google Scholar
  53. Wolery, M., McWilliam, R. A., & Bailey, D. (2005). Teaching infants and preschoolers with disabilities. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs. NJ.Google Scholar
  54. Zuna, N. I., Turnbull, A. P., & Summers, J. A. (2009). Family quality of life: Moving from measurement to application. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities., 6, 25–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-1130.2008.00199.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zuna, N. I., Summers, J. A., Turnbull, A. P., Hu, X., & Xu, S. (2010). Theorizing about family quality of life. In R. Kober (Ed.), Enhancing the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities (pp. 241–278). Houten, The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-9650-0_15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pau García-Grau
    • 1
  • R. A. McWilliam
    • 2
  • Gabriel Martínez-Rico
    • 3
  • María D. Grau-Sevilla
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad Católica de Valencia, San Vicente MártirValenciaSpain
  2. 2.The University of Alabama at TuscaloosaTuscaloosaUSA
  3. 3.Universidad Católica de Valencia, San Vicente MártirGodellaSpain

Personalised recommendations