Advertisement

Persistence in Crime in Young Adults with a History of Juvenile Delinquency: the Role of Mental Health and Psychosocial Problems

  • Miguel Basto-Pereira
  • Ângela Maia
Original Article

Abstract

The prevalence of juvenile offenders recidivating and returning to the justice system during young adulthood is alarming. However, the relationship between psychosocial problems and crime in young adults with a history of juvenile offending remains almost unexplored. This study examined the role of mental health and psychosocial problems in criminal indicators among young adults with a history of juvenile delinquency. The protocol was administered in 2014/2015 to young adults with records of juvenile delinquency in 2010/2011, evaluating a set of mental health, psychosocial, and criminal indicators. The results showed that their current psychological distress and drug consumption are related to criminal indicators. Our findings suggest that mental health might play a major role in criminal behavior. Recommendations for the juvenile justice system and social welfare policies are provided.

Keywords

Juvenile delinquency Psychosocial problems Mental health Recidivism Crime Young adulthood 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors truly appreciate all support provided by the professionals of the Direcção Geral de Reinserção e Serviços Prisionais (DGRSP). In addition, we would like to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Funding Information

The first author was supported by a doctoral grant from the Foundation of Science and Technology, FCT-Portugal (Reference: SFRH/BD/95190/2013). This study was conducted at the Psychology Research Centre, University of Minho, and supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology and the Portuguese Ministry of Education and Science through national funds and when applicable co-financed by FEDER under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement (UID/PSI/01662/2013).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human Rights

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000(5).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

References

  1. Aebi, M., Giger, J., Plattner, B., Metzke, C. W., & Steinhausen, H. C. (2013). Problem coping skills, psychosocial adversities and mental health problems in children and adolescents as predictors of criminal outcomes in young adulthood. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 23(5), 283–293.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-013-0458-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Assink, M., van der Put, C. E., Hoeve, M., de Vries, S. L., Stams, G. J. J., & Oort, F. J. (2015). Risk factors for persistent delinquent behavior among juveniles: a metaanalytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 47–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.08.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barriga, A. Q., Gibbs, J. C., Potter, G., & Liau, A. K. (2001). The How I Think Questionnaire manual. Champaign: Research Press.Google Scholar
  4. Basto-Pereira, M., Começanha, R., Ribeiro, S., & Maia, A. (2015). Long-term predictors of crime desistance in juvenile delinquents: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Aggressive and Violent Behavior, A Review Journal, 25(B), 332–342.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.09.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basto-Pereira, M., Miranda, A., Ribeiro, S., Maia, A. (2017). The psychometric properties of a questionnaire for measuring delinquency and crime (D-CRIM). In M. Sánchez & T. Sánchez (Eds.), Avances en Psicología, 2015 (pp. 856–867). Granada: Asociación Española de Psicología Conductual (AEPC).Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, T., Holloway, K., & Farrington, D. (2008). The effectiveness of neighborhood watch. Campbell Collaboration systematic review final report. Retrieved from: http://campbellcollaboration.org/lib/download/248/. Accessed 4 June 2010.
  7. Bergman, L. R., & Andershed, A. K. (2009). Predictors and outcomes of persistent or age-limited registered criminal behavior: a 30-year longitudinal study of a Swedish urban population. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 1–14.Google Scholar
  8. Canavarro, C. (1999). Inventário de sintomas psicopatológicos—BSI [Brief Symptom Inventory—BSI]. In M. R. Simões & M. M. Gonçalves (Eds.), Testes e provas psicológicas em Portugal (pp. 95–109). Braga: APPORT/SHO.Google Scholar
  9. Caprara, G. V., Cinanni, V., D'Imperio, G., Passerini, S., Renzi, P., & Travaglia, G. (1985). Indicators of impulsive aggression: present status of research on irritability and emotional susceptibility scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(6), 665–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  11. Cottle, C. C., Lee, R. L., & Heilbrun, K. (2001). The prediction of criminal recidivism in juveniles. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 367–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Derogatis, L. R. (1993). BSI Brief Symptom Inventory: administration, scoring, and procedure manual (4th ed.). Minneapolis: National Computers Systems.Google Scholar
  13. DGRSP-Directorate-General of Social Rehabilitation—Ministry of Justice. (2012). Auto-avaliação e Relatório de Atividades—DGRS 2011 (self-assessment and activity report—DGSR—2011). Lisboa: Direção de Serviços de Estudos e Planeamento. Retrieved from http://www.dgrs.mj.pt/c/portal/layout?p_l_id=PUB.1004.1&p_p_id=20&p_p_action=1&p_p_state=exclusive&p_p_mode=view&p_p_col_id=&p_p_col_pos=0&p_p_col_count=0&_20_struts_action=%2Fdocument_library%2Fget_file&_20_folderId=11&_20_name=DGRS_Relat%C3%B3rio+Atividades_+2011.pdf.
  14. Dishion, T. J., & Tipsord, J. M. (2011). Peer contagion in child and adolescent social and emotional development. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 189–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.06.020.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Drake, E. K., Aos, S., & Miller, M. G. (2009). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce crime and criminal justice costs: implications in Washington State. Victims and Offenders, 4, 170–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farrington, D. P. (2003). Key results from the first 40 years of the Cambridge study in delinquent development. In T. P. Thornberry & M. D. Krohn (Eds.), Taking stock of delinquency: an overview of findings from contemporary longitudinal studies (pp. 137–183). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farrington, D. P., Gallagher, B., Morley, L., Ledger, R. J., & West, D. J. (1986). Unemployment, school leaving and crime. British Journal of Criminology, 26, 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farrington, D. P., Ttofi, M. M., & Coid, J. W. (2009). Development of adolescence limited, late-onset and persistent offenders from age 8 to age 48. Aggressive Behaviour, 35, 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fatori, D., Bordin, I. A., Curto, B. M., & de Paula, C. S. (2013). Influence of psychosocial risk factors on the trajectory of mental health problems from childhood to adolescence: a longitudinal study. BMC Psychiatry, 13(31), 1–6.Google Scholar
  20. Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  21. Galea, S., & Tracy, M. (2007). Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Annals of Epidemiology, 17(9), 643–653.Google Scholar
  22. Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: what works! Criminology, 34, 575–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Green, S. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 499–510.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Henry, K. L., Knight, K. E., & Thornberry, T. P. (2012). School disengagement as a predictor of dropout, delinquency, and problem substance use during adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 156–166.  https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10964-011-9665-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Loeber, R., Farrington, D., & Petechuk, D. (2003). Child delinquency: early intervention and prevention. Retrieved from: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/offdp/186162.pdf. Accessed 05 Nov 2015.
  26. Loeber, R., Pardini, D. A., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Raine, A. (2007). Do cognitive, physiological, and psychosocial risk and promotive factors predict desistance from delinquency in males? Development and Psychopathology, 19, 867–887.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lopes, G., Krohn, M. D., Lizotte, A. J., Schmidt, N. M., Vásquez, B. E., & Bernburg, J. G. (2012). Labeling and cumulative disadvantage: the impact of formal police intervention on life chances and crime during emerging adulthood. Crime and Delinquency, 58(3), 456–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maniglio, R., & Innamorati, M. (2014). Psychosocial correlates of adolescent cannabis use: data from the Italian subsample of the second international self-reported delinquency study. Journal of Addictive Disorders, 33, 210–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Midgley, B. (2005). Achieving just outcomes for homeless people through the court process. Journal of Judicial Administration, 15(2), 82–106.Google Scholar
  30. Mulder, E., Brand, E., Bullens, R., & van Marle, H. (2011). Risk factors for overall recidivism and severity recidivism in serious juvenile offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 118–135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nivette, A. (2011). Cross-national predictors of crime: a meta-analysis. Homicide Studies, 15(2), 103–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pereira, M., Melo, C., Gameiro, S., & Canavarro, M. C. (2011). Estudos psicométricos da versão em Português Europeu do índice de qualidade de vida EUROHIS-QOL-8 [Psychometric studies of the European Portuguese version of the quality of life index EUROHIS-QOL-8]. Laboratório de Psicologia, 9(2), 109–123.  https://doi.org/10.14417/lp.627.Google Scholar
  33. Power, M. (2003). Development of a common instrument for quality of life. In A. Nosikov & C. Gudex (Eds.), EUROHIS: developing common instruments for health surveys (pp. 145–159). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  34. Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2005). Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: a metaanalysis. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: a review of research. (Vol. 32) (pp. 373–450). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Stolzenberg, L., & D’Alessio, S. J. (2008). Co-offending and the age-crime curve. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Trulson, R., Marquart, J. W., Mullings, J. L., & Caeti, J. (2005). In between adolescence and adulthood: recidivism outcomes of a cohort of state delinquentes. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 3, 355–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Trzesniewski, K. H., Donnellan, M. B., Moffitt, T. E., Robins, R. W., Poulton, R., & Caspi, A. (2006). Low self-esteem during adolescence predicts poor health, criminal behavior, and limited economic prospects during adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 42, 381–390.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. VanVoorhis, C. R., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Veloso, A. C. C. (2013). Validação do How I Think: Questionnaire para a população adulta portuguesa [Portuguese validation of How I Think: Questionnaire for the Portuguese adult population] (Tese de mestrado não publicada/unpublished master’s thesis). Instituto Superior de Ciências da Saúde Egas Moniz: Lisboa.Google Scholar
  40. Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. (2011). The benefits and costs of early prevention compared with imprisonment: toward evidence-based policy. Prison Journal, 91, 120–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Welsh, B. C., & Rocque, M. (2014). When crime prevention harms: a review of systematic reviews. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10, 245–266.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9199-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wright, K. A., Pratt, T. C., Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2013). The systemic model of crime and institutional efficacy: an analysis of the social context of offender reintegration. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(1), 92–111.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11425218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Yu, R., Geddes, J. R., & Fazel, S. (2012). Personality disorders, violence, and antisocial behavior: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26(5), 775–792.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology Research Centre, School of PsychologyUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations