Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An application of game theory in distributed collaborative decision making

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a distributed product realization environment, new paradigms and accompanying software systems are necessary to support the collaborative work of geographically dispersed engineering teams from different disciplines who have different knowledge, experience, tools and resources. To verify the concept of collaboration by separation, we propose a generic information communication medium to enable knowledge representation and exchange between engineering teams, a digital interface. Across digital interfaces, each engineering team maintains its own perspective towards the product realization problem, and each controls a subset of design variables and seeks to maximize its own payoff function subject to individual constraints. Hence, we postulate the use of principles from game theory to model the relationships between engineering teams and facilitate collaborative decision making without causing unnecessary information exchange or iteration across digital interfaces. A product design and manufacturing scenario is introduced to demonstrate the efficacy of using game theory to maintain a clean interface between design and manufacturing teams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li W D, Lu W F, Fuh J Y H, et al. Collaborative computer-aided design—Research and development status. Computer Aided Design, 2005, 37(9): 931–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang L, Shen W, Xie H, et al. Collaborative conceptual design—State of the art and future trends. Computer Aided Design, 2002, 34(13): 981–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosen D, Chen Y, Gerhard J, et al. Design decision templates and their implementation for distributed design and solid freeform fabrication. In: Proceedings of ASME Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Baltimore: ASME, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chao P, Wang Y. A data exchange framework for networked CAD/CAM. Computers in Industry, 2001, 44(2): 131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu D, Rosen D W, Wang L, et al. Cloud-based design and manufacturing: A new paradigm in digital manufacturing and design innovation. Computer Aided Design, 2015, 59: 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Whitfield R I, Duffy A H B, Gatchell S, et al. A collaborative platform for integrating and optimizing computational fluid dynamics analysis requests. Computer Aided Design, 2012, 44(3): 224–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eynard B, Liénard S, Charles S, et al. Web-based collaborative engineering support system: Applications in mechanical design and structural analysis. Concurrent Engineering, Research and Applications, 2005, 13(2): 145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kleiner S, Anderl R, Gräb R. A collaborative design system for product data integration. Journal of Engineering Design, 2003, 14(4): 421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schlenoff C, Gruninger M, Creek T, et al. The essence of the process specification language. Transactions of the Society for Computer Simulation, 1999, 16(4): 204–216

    Google Scholar 

  10. Whitfield R, Duffy A H, Coates G, et al. Distributed design coordination. Research in Engineering Design, 2002, 13(4): 243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Whitfield R I, Duffy A H B, Boyle I, et al. An integrated environment for organisational decision support. Computers in Industry, 2011, 62(8–9): 842–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Whitfield R I, Duffy A H B, York P, et al. Managing the exchange of engineering product data to support through life ship design. Computer Aided Design, 2011, 43(5): 516–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoffmann C M, Joan-Arinyo R. Distributed maintenance of multiple product views. Computer Aided Design, 2000, 32(7): 421–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffman C M, Joan-Arinyo R. CAD and the product master model. Computer Aided Design, 1998, 30(11): 905–918

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Badin J, Monticolo D, Chamoret D, et al. Using the knowledge configuration model to manage knowledge in configuration for upstream phases of the design process. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 2011, 5: 171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Belkadi F, Dremont N, Notin A, et al. A meta-modelling framework for knowledge consistency in collaborative design. Annual Reviews in Control, 2012, 36(2): 346–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bracewell R, Wallace K, Moss M, et al. Capturing design rationale. Computer Aided Design, 2009, 41(3): 173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peng G, Wang H, Zhang H, et al. A collaborative system for capturing and reusing in-context design knowledge with an integrated representation model. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2017, 33: 314–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chandrasegaran S K, Ramani K, Sriram R D, et al. The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems. Computer Aided Design, 2013, 45(2): 204–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mistree F, Smith W F, Bras B, et al. Decision-based design: A contemporary paradigm for ship design. Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 1990, 98: 565–597

    Google Scholar 

  21. McMahon C, Liu Y, McAdams D, et al. Ontology-based executable design decision template representation and reuse. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 2016, 30(4): 390–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nellippallil A B, Song K N, Goh C H, et al. A goal-oriented, sequential, inverse design method for the horizontal integration of a multistage hot rod rolling system. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2017, 139(3): 031403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vadde S, Allen J K, Mistree F. Compromise decision support problems for hierarchical design involving uncertainty. Computers & Structures, 1994, 52(4): 645–658

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu Y, Rao S S. Game-theory approach for multi-objective optimal design of stationary flat-plate solar collectors. Engineering Optimization, 2009, 41(11): 1017–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dhingra A K, Rao S S. A cooperative fuzzy game theoretic approach to multiple objective design optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 1995, 83(3): 547–567

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Sunar M, Rao S S. Simultaneous passive and active control design of structures using multiobjective optimization strategies. Computers & Structures, 1993, 48(5): 913–924

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Rao S S. Game theory approach for multiobjective structural optimization. Computers & Structures, 1987, 25(1): 119–127

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Badhrinath K, Jagannatha Rao J R. Modeling for concurrent design using game theory formulations. Concurrent Engineering, 1996, 4(4): 389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Takai S. A game-theoretic model of collaboration in engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2010, 132(5): 051005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xiao M, Shao X, Gao L, et al. A new methodology for multiobjective multidisciplinary design optimization problems based on game theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(3): 1602–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen L, Li S. A computerized team approach for concurrent product and process design optimization. Computer Aided Design, 2002, 34(1): 57–69

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Ge Z, Hu Q. Collaboration in R&D activities: Firm-specific decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 185(2): 864–883

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Lewis K, Mistree F. Collaborative, sequential and isolated decisions in design. ASME journal of Mechanical Engineering, 1998, 120(4): 643–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lewis K, Mistree F. Modeling interactions in multidisciplinary design: A game theoretic approach. AIAA Journal, 1997, 35(8): 1387–1392

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Montgomery D C. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 8th ed. Wiley, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sambu S. A design for manufacture method for rapid prototyping and rapid tooling. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D, et al. The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Computer Aided Design, 2015, 69: 65–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was performed at the Systems Realization Laboratory at Georgia Institute of Technology, and Department of Mechanical Engineering Technology and Industrial Design at New York City College of Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Design Technology, New York City College of Technology, City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, 11201, USA

    Angran Xiao

Authors
  1. Angran Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angran Xiao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, A. An application of game theory in distributed collaborative decision making. Front. Mech. Eng. 14, 85–101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-019-0523-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-019-0523-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation