Skip to main content
Log in

Vegetation dynamics dominate the energy flux partitioning across typical ecosystem in the Heihe River Basin: Observation with numerical modeling

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the controls on seasonal variation of energy partitioning and separation between canopy and soil surface are important for qualifying the vegetation feedback to climate system. Using observed day-to-day variations of energy balance components including net radiation, sensible heat flux, latent heat flux ground heat flux, and meteorological variables combined with an energy-balanced two-source model, energy partitioning were investigated at six sites in Heihe River Basin from 2014 to 2016. Bowen ratio (β) among the six sites exhibited significant seasonal variations while showed smaller inter-annual fluctuations. All ecosystems exhibit a “U-shaped” pattern, characterized by smaller value of β in growing season, with a minimum value in July, and fluctuating day to day. During the growing season, average Bowen ratio was the highest for the alpine swamp meadow (0.60 ± 0.30), followed by the desert riparian forest Populus euphratica (0.47 ± 0.72), the alpine desert(0.46 ± 0.10), the Tamarix ramosissima desert riparian shrub ecosystem (0.33 ± 0.57), alpine meadow ecosystem (0.32 ± 0.17), and cropland ecosystem (0.27 ± 0.46). The agreement of Bowen ratio between simulated and observed values demonstrated that the two-source model is a promising tool for energy partitioning and separation between canopy and soil surface. The importance of biophysical control explains the convergence of seasonal and annual patterns of Bowen ratio for all ecosystems, and the changes in Bowen ratio showed divergence among varied ecosystems because of different physiological responses to energy flow pathways between canopy and soil surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arora V, 2002. Modeling vegetation as a dynamic component in soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer schemes and hydrological models. Reviews of Geophysics, 40(3): 3−1–3−26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burakowski E, Tawfik A, Ouimette A et al., 2018. The role of surface roughness, albedo, and Bowen ratio on ecosystem energy balance in the eastern United States. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 249: 367–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin et al., 2002. Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng G, Li X, Zhao W et al., 2014. Integrated study of the water-ecosystem-economy in the Heihe River Basin. National Science Review, 1: 413–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good S P, Noone D, Bowen G, 2015. Hydrologic connectivity constrains partitioning of global terrestrial water fluxes. Science, 349: 175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerle A, Haslwanter A, 2008. Leaf area controls on energy partitioning of a temperate mountain grassland. Biogeosciences, 5(2): 421–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasechko S, Sharp Z D, Gibson J J et al., 2013. Terrestrial water fluxes dominated by transpiration. Nature, 496: 347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Li X, Xu Z, et al., 2018. The Heihe Integrated Observatory Network: A basin-scale land surface processes observatory in China. Vadose Zone Journal, 17: 180072. doi: https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.04.0072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Xu Z, Wang W et al., 2011. A comparison of eddy-covariance and large aperture scintillometer measurements with respect to the energy balance closure problem. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15: 1291–1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Xu Z, Zhu Z et al., 2013. Measurements of evapotranspiration from eddy-covariance systems and large aperture scintillometers in the Hai River Basin, China. Journal of Hydrology, 487: 24–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell R M, Condon L E, 2016. Connections between groundwater flow and transpiration partitioning. Science, 353: 377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ning L, Zhan C, Luo Y et al., 2019. A review of fully coupled atmosphere-hydrology simulations. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29(3): 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan X, Liu Y B, Fan X W et al., 2017. Two energy balance closure approaches: Applications and comparisons over an oasis-desert ecotone. Journal of Arid Land, 9(1): 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth W J, Wallace J, 1985. Evaporation from sparse crops: An energy combination theory. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 111: 839–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takle E S, 2015. Agricultural meteorology and climatology. Encyclopedia of Atmospheric Sciences, 25(680): 92–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Li X Y, Huang Y M et al., 2016. Numerical modeling the isotopic composition of evapotranspiration in an arid artificial oasis cropland ecosystem with high-frequency water vapor isotope measurement. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 230/231: 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Li X Y, Wang L et al., 2018. Divergent evapotranspiration partition dynamics between shrubs and grasses in a shrub-encroached steppe ecosystem. New Phytologist, 219: 1325–1337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Tsutomu Y, 2014. Application of a two-source model for partitioning evapotranspiration and assessing its controls in temperate grasslands in central Japan. Ecohydrology, 7: 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Tsutomu Y, Li X Y et al., 2015. Partitioning evapotranspiration in a temperate grassland ecosystem: Numerical modeling with isotopic tracers. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 208: 16–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Yamanaka T, Li X Y et al., 2018. A multiple time scale modeling investigation of leaf water isotope enrichment in a temperate grassland ecosystem. Ecological Research, 33(5): 901–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Yang W, Huang J et al., 2017. Shrub encroachment effect on the evapotranspiration and its component: A numerical simulation study of a shrub encroachment grassland in Nei Mongol, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 41(3): 348–358. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott C J, Ackleson S G, Davis R E et al., 1985. Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 90(C5): 8995–9005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Liu S, Li X et al., 2013. Intercomparison of surface energy flux measurement systems used during the Hi-WATER-MUSOEXE. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118: 13140–13157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F Q, 2015. Encyclopedia of Atmospheric Sciences. 2nd ed. Academic Press, 92–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao P, Zhang, Li S et al., 2017. Vineyard energy partitioning between canopy and soil surface: dynamics and biophysical controls. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 18(7): 1809–1829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pei Wang.

Additional information

Foundation:

The Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.XDA20100102; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41730854, No.41671019; Projects by the State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology

Author: Wang Pei (1978-), PhD and Associate Professor, specialized in ecohydrology, isotope hydrology.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, P., Li, X., Tong, Y. et al. Vegetation dynamics dominate the energy flux partitioning across typical ecosystem in the Heihe River Basin: Observation with numerical modeling. J. Geogr. Sci. 29, 1565–1577 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1677-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1677-z

Keywords

Navigation