Design of a three-dimensional earth pressure device and its application in a tailings dam construction simulation experiment

Abstract

The basic principle of the three-dimensional stress state test is deduced based on the relationship between the normal stress and the conventional stress state, and the relationship between the total stress state and the effective stress state is given based on Terzaghi’s effective stress principle. On this basis, we made a three-dimensional earth pressure device by using a pedestal obtained by 3D printing technology, 6 micro earth pressure cells, a pore pressure cell and an attitude sensor. Considering the effect on the tested values of the dynamic change in the normal stress direction, the conversion relationship between the absolute test direction and the relative test direction of the test device is deduced, which can be used to dynamically test the three-dimensional total stress state and three-dimensional effective stress state. In addition, a method to calculate the K0 value is proposed based on the earth pressure device comparing with the direct test result by the K0 oedometer and indirect test results by direct shear test and triaxial test in laboratory. Two three-dimensional earth pressure devices are used in a simulation experiment of tailings dam construction, and the results show that with the increase in pore pressure, the calculated errors of the three-dimensional stress state caused by rotation angles will be more noticeable. This study has engineering value for in situ geotechnical testing and soil strength prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

References

  1. 1.

    Ahmed MR, Tran VDH, Meguid MA (2015) On the role of geogrid reinforcement in reducing earth pressure on buried pipes: experimental and numerical investigations. Soils Found 55:588–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ajovalasit A, D’Acquisto L, Fragapane S, Zuccarello B (2007) Stiffness and reinforcement effect of electrical resistance strain gauges. Strain 43:299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Borges JAR, Pires LF, Cassaro FAM, Roque WL, Heck RJ, Rosa JA, Wolf FG (2018) X-ray microtomography analysis of representative elementary volume (REV) of soil morphological and geometrical properties. Soil Tillage Res 182:112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chernov IA (1991) Determination of transverse of resistor strain-gauges. Meas Tech USSR 34:249–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Clayton CRI, Bica AVD (1993) The design of diaphragm-type boundary total stress cells. Geotechnique 43:523–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Collins IF (1990) The nature of stress and velocity characteristics for critical stress states. Geotechnique 40:125–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fortuna S (2011) Validation of Lade’s failure criteria at overconsolidated general stress states. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137:105–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H (1993) Soil mechanics for unsaturated soils. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    GBSL237-1999 (1999) Specification of soil test. China Water and Power Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Horn R, Johnson C, Semmel H, Schafer R, Lebert M (1992) Stress measurements in undisturbed unsaturated soils with a stress state transducer (SST): theory and 1st result. Zeitschrift Fuer Pflanzenernaehrung Und Bodenkunde 155:269–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hu N, Yu HS, Yang DS, Zhuang PZ (2019) Constitutive modelling of granular materials using a contact normal-based fabric tensor. Acta Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00811-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Huang S, Khan AS (1991) On the use of electrical - resistance metallic foil strain: gauges for measuring large dynamic plastic-deformation. Exp Mech 31:122–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jiang HW, Zhang JQ, Jiang RN (2017) Stress evaluation for rocks and structural concrete members through ultrasonic wave analysis: review. J Mater Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jiang M, Zhu J, Chen S, Wang X, Guo W (2019) Experimental study on influence factors and empirical formula of K0 for coarse grained soil. KSCE J Civil Eng 23:3305–3314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kuhn MR, Sun WC, Wang Q (2015) Stress-induced anisotropy in granular materials: fabric, stiffness, and permeability. Acta Geotech 10:399–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-015-0397-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Li JH, Zhang LM (2010) Geometric parameters and REV of a crack network in soil. Comput Geotech 37:466–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Li X, Yu HS, Li XS (2009) Macro-micro relations in granular mechanics. Int J Solids Struct 46:4331–4341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.08.018

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lim P, Tang L, Ni P (2019) Field evaluation of subgrade soils under dynamic loads using orthogonal earth pressure transducers. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 121:12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lu DC, Du XL, Zhou AN, Yao YP (2011) The principal stresses of soil mass in the direction of plane strain. Adv Mater Res 243–249:2657–2665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mitchell JK, Kenichi S (2005) Fundamentals of soil behavior, 3rd edn. John Wiley and Sons Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Muszynski M, Olson S, Hashash Y, Phillips C (2016) Earth pressure measurements using tactile pressure sensors in a saturated sand during static and dynamic centrifuge testing. Geotech Test J 39:371–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Palmer MC, O’Rourke TD, Olson NA, Abdoun T, Ha D, O’Rourke MJ (2009) Tactile pressure sensors for soil-structure interaction assessment. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135:1638–1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Selig ET (1980) Soil stress gage calibration. Geotech Test J 3:153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Talesnick M (2005) Measuring soil contact pressure on a solid boundary and quantifying soil arching. Geotech Test J 28:171–179

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Talesnick M, Horany H, Dancygier AN, Karinski YS (2008) Measuring soil pressure on a buried model structure for the validation of quantitative frameworks. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134:855–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Talesnick M, Xia H, Moore I (2011) Earth pressure measurements on buried HDPE pipe. Geotechnique 61:721–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Weiler WA, Kulhawy FH (1982) Factors affecting stress cell measurements in soil. J Geotech Found Div ASCE 108:1529–1548

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wenxi Y (2019) Research on the application performance of three dimensional earth pressure device. Master dissertation, Tianjin Chengjian University

  30. 30.

    Zhao CG, Liu ZZ, Shi PX, Li J, Cai GQ, Wei CF (2016) Average soil skeleton stress for unsaturated soils and discussion on effective stress. Int J Geomech 16:D4015006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhu B, Jardine R, Foray P (2009) The use of miniature soil stress measuring cells in laboratory applications involving stress reversals. Soils Found 49:675–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Key Laboratory Funding of Independent Research Project (No. S18406), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41877251), National Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning (No. 2019-ZD-0187), and Tianjin Key Research and Development Project (No. 19YFZCSF00820). We would like to express our great acknowledgements to Benxi Iron & Steel Group who provided us many helps in the test process, and we wish to express our deepest gratitude goes to the anonymous reviewers and editors for their careful works and thoughtful suggestions that have helped improve this paper substantially.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoxia Guo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Guo, X., Shao, L. et al. Design of a three-dimensional earth pressure device and its application in a tailings dam construction simulation experiment. Acta Geotech. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01138-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Inverse matrix
  • K 0 value
  • Normal stress
  • Tailings dam
  • Three-dimensional earth pressure device