Seismic stability analysis of a hunchbacked retaining wall under passive state using method of stress characteristics

Abstract

The potential use of a hunchbacked retaining wall over a conventional retaining wall under the seismic passive state is emphasised in this study employing the method of stress characteristics coupled with the modified pseudo-dynamic approach. Unlike the available studies established with the limit equilibrium or the limit analysis method where a predefined failure mechanism is assumed prior to the analysis, the failure surface is continuously traced in due course of the present analysis. The seismic stability of a hunchbacked retaining wall under the passive condition is found to be affected greatly while considering the effect of damping of the soil-wall and the phase difference of the seismic waves. A detailed parametric study is conducted considering the influence of different soil and wall parameters such as soil-wall inertia, soil friction angle, wall inclination and roughness. The present results are obtained from a rigorous computational effort without assuming a failure mechanism and found to be in good agreement with the previous studies available in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Abbreviations

ah, av :

Horizontal and vertical seismic accelerations

B, H :

Width and height of the wall

DS, DW :

Constant damping ratio of the soil and the wall

FN, FT :

Normal and tangential components of forces acting at the base of the wall

FS S :

Factor of safety against sliding

g :

Acceleration due to gravity

H1, H2 :

Height of upper and lower part of the wall

kh, kv :

Horizontal and vertical seismic acceleration coefficients

Kpq1, Kpq2 :

Passive earth pressure coefficients for upper and lower part of the wall due to surcharge

Kpγ1, Kpγ2 :

Passive earth pressure coefficients for upper and lower part of the wall due to unit weight of the soil

Ppe1, Ppe2 :

Lateral thrusts acting on upper and lower part of the wall due to surcharge and unit weight of the soil

Ppq1, Ppq2 :

Lateral thrusts acting on upper and lower part of the wall due to surcharge only

q :

Uniformly distributed surcharge

QHS, QVS :

Horizontal and vertical inertial forces in the backfill soil

QHW, QVW :

Horizontal and vertical inertial forces in the wall

t :

Time

T :

Period of lateral shaking

VpS, VsS :

Primary and shear wave velocities in the soil

VpW, VsW :

Primary and shear wave velocities in the wall

W S :

Weight of the backfill soil

W W :

Weight of the wall

x, y :

Axes in two-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system

α1, α2 :

Inclination angle for upper and lower part of the wall

δ1, δ2 :

Wall roughness at upper and lower part of the wall

ϕ :

Angle of internal friction of the soil

γ, γc :

Unit weight of the soil and the wall material

μ b :

Coefficient of base friction for the wall

σ :

Distance on the Mohr stress diagram, between the centre of the Mohr circle and a point where the Coulomb’s linear failure envelope intersects the σ-axis

θ :

Angle made by σ1 in a counter-clockwise sense with the positive x-axis

θ g :

Magnitude of θ along the ground surface

θ W1 , θ W2 :

Magnitude of θ along upper and lower part of the wall

References

  1. 1.

    Basha BM, Babu GLS (2009) Computation of sliding displacements of bridge abutments by pseudo-dynamic method. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29(1):103–120

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bellezza I (2014) A new pseudo-dynamic approach for seismic active soil thrust. Geotech Geol Eng 32(2):561–576

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bellezza I (2015) Seismic active earth pressure on walls using a new pseudo-dynamic approach. Geotech Geol Eng 33(4):795–812

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cao W, Liu T, Xu Z (2019) Calculation of passive earth pressure using the simplified principal stress trajectory method on rigid retaining walls. Comput Geotech 109:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.01.021

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chen WF (1975) Limit analysis and soil plasticity. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Choudhury D, Nimbalkar S (2005) Seismic passive resistance by pseudo-dynamic method. Géotechnique 55(9):699–702

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Coulomb CA (1773) Sur une application des regles de maximis et minimis a quelques problemes de statique relatifs a l’architecture. Mem Math Phys par Divers Savants

  8. 8.

    Das BM (1993) Principles of soil dynamics. PWS-KENT, Boston, USA

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    European Committee for Standardization (CEN) (2004) Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance–Part 5: foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects. Ref. No. EN 1998–5:2004, CEN, Brussels, Belgium

  10. 10.

    Ganesh R, Sahoo JP (2017) Seismic passive resistance of cohesive-frictional soil medium: kinematic limit analysis. Int J Geomech 17(8):04017029–1–26

  11. 11.

    Ghosh P (2007) Seismic passive earth pressure behind non-vertical retaining wall using pseudo-dynamic analysis. Geotech Geol Eng 25(1):117–123

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ghosh P (2008) Upper bound solutions of bearing capacity of strip footing by pseudo-dynamic approach. Acta Geotech 3(2):115–123

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ghosh P (2009) Seismic vertical uplift capacity of horizontal strip anchors using pseudo-dynamic approach. Comput Geotech 36(1–2):342–351

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ghosh P, Kolathayar S (2011) Seismic passive earth pressure behind non vertical wall with composite failure mechanism: pseudo-dynamic approach. Geotech Geol Eng 29(3):363–373

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Guojun X, Jianhua W (2018) A rigorous characteristic line theory for axisymmetric problems and its application in circular excavations. Acta Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0697-7

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Indian Standard (IS) 1893(2014): Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Part 3: Bridges and retaining walls. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  17. 17.

    Khatri VN (2019) Determination of passive earth pressure with lower bound finite elements limit analysis and modified pseudo-dynamic method. Geomech Geoengin. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2019.1573324

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kolathayar S, Ghosh P (2011) Seismic passive earth pressure on walls with bilinear backface using pseudo-dynamic approach. Geotech Geol Eng 29(3):307–317

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Krabbenhoft K (2018) Static and seismic earth pressure coefficients for vertical walls with horizontal backfill. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 104:403–407

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kumar J (2001) Seismic passive earth pressure coefficients for sands. Can Geotech J 38(4):876–881

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kumar J, Chitikela S (2002) Seismic passive earth pressure coefficients using the method of characteristics. Can Geotech J 39(2):463–471

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lancellotta R (2007) Lower-bound approach for seismic passive earth resistance. Géotechnique 57(3):319–321

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lee IK, Herington JR (1972) A theoretical study of the pressures acting on a rigid wall by a sloping earth or rock fill. Géotechnique 22(1):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Li C, Jiang P, Zhou A (2019) Rigorous solution of slope stability under seismic action. Comput Geotech 109:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.01.018

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lin Y-L, Yang X, Yang G-L et al (2017) A closed-form solution for seismic passive earth pressure behind a retaining wall supporting cohesive–frictional backfill. Acta Geotech 12(2):453–461

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mononobe N, Matsuo H (1929) On the determination of earth pressure during earthquake. In: Proceedings of the World Engineering Conference. pp 177–185

  27. 27.

    Morrison EE, Ebeling RM (1995) Dynamic passive earth pressure. 487(3):481–487

  28. 28.

    Mylonakis G, Kloukinas P, Papantonopoulos C (2007) An alternative to the Mononobe-Okabe equations for seismic earth pressures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27(10):957–969

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Newmark NM (1965) Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Géotechnique 15(2):139–160

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Okabe S (1926) General theory of earth pressure. J Japan Soc Civ Eng 12(1):311

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Pain A, Choudhury D, Bhattacharyya SK (2017) Seismic passive earth resistance using modified pseudo-dynamic method. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 16(2):263–274

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    PIANC (2001) Seismic design guidelines for port structures. International Navigation Association. A. A, Balkema, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Rajesh BG, Choudhury D (2017) Seismic passive earth resistance in submerged soils using modified pseudo-dynamic method with curved rupture surface. Mar Georesources Geotechnol 35(7):930–938

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Rajesh BG, Choudhury D (2018) Seismic stability of seawalls under earthquake and tsunami forces using a modified pseudodynamic method. Nat Hazards Rev 19(3):04018005–1–12

  35. 35.

    Rankine WJM (1857) On the stability of loose earth. Philos Trans R Soc London 147:9–27

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Richards R, Elms DG, Budhu M (1990) Dynamic fluidization of soils. J Geotech Eng 116(5):740–759

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Sadrekarimi A, Ghalandarzadeh A, Sadrekarimi J (2008) Static and dynamic behavior of hunchbacked gravity quay walls. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(2):99–117

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sadrekarimi A (2017) Seismic distress of broken-back gravity retaining walls. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 143(4):04016118

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Santhoshkumar G, Ghosh P (2018) Seismic passive earth pressure on an inclined cantilever retaining wall using method of stress characteristics – A new approach. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 107:77–82

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Santhoshkumar G, Ghosh P (2019) Closed-form solution for seismic earth pressure on bilinear retaining wall using method of characteristics. J Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1570880

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sokolovski VV (1960) Statics of Soil Media, 2nd edn. Butterworths Scientific Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Soubra AH (2000) Static and seismic passive earth pressure coefficients on rigid retaining structures. Can Geotech J 37(2):463–478

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Steedman RS, Zeng X (1990) The influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall. Géotechnique 40(1):103–112

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Subba Rao KS, Choudhury D (2005) Seismic passive earth pressures in soils. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 131(1):131–135

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Sun Y, Song E (2016) Active earth pressure analysis based on normal stress distribution function along failure surface in soil obeying nonlinear failure criterion. Acta Geotech 11(2):255–268

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    USBR (1976) Design of gravity dams. United States Department of the Interior, A Water Resources Technical Publication, Denver, Colorado

  47. 47.

    Wilson PR (2009) Large scale passive force-displacement and dynamic earth pressure experiments and simulations. University of California, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Xu S-Y, Kannangara KKPM, Taciroglu E (2018) Analysis of the stress distribution across a retaining wall backfill. Comput Geotech 103:13–25

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Xu S-Y, Lawal AI, Shamsabadi A, Taciroglu E (2019) Estimation of static earth pressures for a sloping cohesive backfill using extended Rankine theory with a composite log-spiral failure surface. Acta Geotech 14:579–594

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Zeng X, Steedman RS (1993) On the behaviour of quay walls in earthquakes. Géotechnique 43(3):417–431

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priyanka Ghosh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santhoshkumar, G., Ghosh, P. Seismic stability analysis of a hunchbacked retaining wall under passive state using method of stress characteristics. Acta Geotech. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01003-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Earthquake
  • Earth pressure
  • Hunchbacked retaining wall
  • Method of stress characteristics
  • Modified pseudo-dynamic approach