Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mechanical behaviour of biocemented sands at various treatment levels and relative densities

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that biocement, or microbially induced calcite precipitation, can improve the mechanical behaviour of clean sand. However, the behaviour of biocemented sand is affected by several factors. In this paper, triaxial consolidated drained tests and K0 consolidation tests were carried out on sands (Ottawa sand, ASTM graded) with varying biocement treatment passes and relative densities to study the failure and drained stress–strain behaviour and compressibility of biocemented sand. It is found that for loose and medium dense sands, the slight biocement treatment on sand can be as good as or better than the densification treatment in terms of the strength improvement and the deformation control. In the triaxial tests, the shear strength, the slope of failure line in p’-q plane and the peak dilation rate increase with the increase in treatment passes at various levels of relative density. For the loose sand (Dr = 30%), 2-pass biocement treatments (1.0% calcite content) are sufficient to achieve a shear strength, a slope of failure line and a peak dilation rate higher than or similar to that of untreated dense sand (Dr = 90%), and for the medium dense sand (Dr = 50%), 1-pass biocement treatment (0.79% calcite content) is sufficient. In the K0 consolidation tests, the axial strain of the sand decreases with the increasing treatment passes. For medium dense sand (Dr = 50%), 1-pass treatment can control the axial strain to a level similar to that of untreated dense sand (Dr = 90%). The variation of K0 value versus axial strain during K0 consolidation for the biocemented sand shows a different pattern compared with the untreated sand, due to the presence of biocementation effect. Biocemented sand shows a smaller K0 value than the corresponding untreated sand at the final state of the K0 consolidation tests. Scanning electron microscopy was also conducted on the sand samples to investigate the particle-level structure of the biocemented sand and its correlations to the mechanical behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al Qabany A, Soga K (2013) Effect of chemical treatment used in MICP on engineering properties of cemented soils. Geotechnique 63(4):331–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al Qabany A, Soga K, Santamarina JC (2012) Factors affecting efficiency of microbially induced calcite precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 138(8):992–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alexiew D, Brokemper D, Lothspeich S (2005) Geotextile encased columns (GEC): load capacity, geotextile selection and pre-design graphs. Geo-Frontiers Congr 130:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  4. ASTM (2012) Standard specification for standard sand. C778-12, West Conshohocken, PA

  5. Blauw M, Lambert JWM, Latil MN (2009) Biosealing: a method for in situ sealing of leakages. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on ground improvement technologies and case histories, Singapore, pp 125–130

  6. Cheng L, Cord-Ruwisch R, Shahin MA (2012) Cementation of sand soil by microbially induced calcite precipitation at various degrees of saturation. Can Geotech J 50(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng XH, Ma Q, Yang Z, Zhang ZC, Li M (2013) Dynamic response of liquefiable sand foundation improved by bio-grouting. Chin J Geotech Eng 35(8):1486–1495

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chou CW, Seagren EA, Asce AM, Aydilek AH, Asce M, Lai M (2011) Biocalcification of sand through ureolysis. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(12):1179–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chu J, Gan CL (2004) Effect of void ratio on K0 of loose sand. Geotechnique 54(4):285–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chu J, Leroueil S, Leong WK (2003) Unstable behaviour of sand and its implication for slope instability. Can Geotech J 40(5):873–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chu J, Varaksin S, Klotz U, Mengé P (2009) Construction processes. In: Proceedings of 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Alexandria, Egypt, pp 5–9

  12. Cui M, Zheng J, Zhang R, Lai H, Zhang J (2017) Influence of cementation level on the strength behaviour of bio-cemented sand. Acta Geotech 12(5):971–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dadda A, Geindreau C, Emeriault F, du Roscoat SR, Garandet A, Sapin L, Filet AE (2017) Characterization of microstructural and physical properties changes in biocemented sand using 3D X-ray microtomography. Acta Geotech 12(5):955–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. DeJong JT, Fritages MB, Nusslein K (2006) Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shear. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(11):1381–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dejong JT, Mortensen BM, Martinez BC, Nelson DC, Jonkers HM, Loosdrecht MCMV (2010) Bio-mediated soil improvement. Ecol Eng 36(2):197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. DeJong JT, Soga K, Kavazanjian E, Burns SE, Paassen LAV et al (2013) Biogeochemical processes and geotechnical applications: progress, opportunities and challenges. Geotechnique 63(4):287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dejong JT, Montoya BM, Boulanger RW (2013) Dynamic response of liquefiable sand improved by microbial-induced calcite precipitation. Geotechnique 63(4):302–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dhami NK, Sudhakara RM, Abhijit M (2013) Biomineralization of calcium carbonates and their engineered applications: a review. Front Microbiol 4(314):314

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fujita Y, Taylor JL, Wendt LM et al (2010) Evaluating the potential of native ureolytic microbes to remediate a 90Sr contaminated environment. Environ Sci Technol 44(19):7652–7658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hamdan N, Kavazanjian EJ (2016) Enzyme-induced carbonate mineral precipitation for fugitive dust control. Geotechnique 66(7):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Han ZG, Cheng XH, Ma Q (2016) An experimental study on dynamic response for MICP strengthening liquefiable sands. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 15(4):673–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Harkes MP, Van Paassen LA, Booster JL et al (2010) Fixation and distribution of bacterial activity in sand to induce carbonate precipitation for ground reinforcement. Ecol Eng 36(2):112–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hawkins AB, McDonald C (1992) Decalcification and residual shear strength reduction in Fuller’s earth clay. Geotechnique 42(3):453–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. He J, Chu J (2014) Undrained responses of microbially desaturated sand under monotonic loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 140(5):04014003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. He J, Chu J, Ivanov V (2013) Mitigation of liquefaction of saturated sand using biogas. Geotechnique 63(4):267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. He J, Chu J, Liu HL, Gao YF, Li B (2016) Research advances in biogeotechnologies. Chin J Geotech Eng 38(4):643–653

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ivanov V, Chu J (2008) Applications of microorganisms to geotechnical engineering for bioclogging and biocementation of soil in situ. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7(2):139–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jiang NJ, Soga K (2017) The applicability of microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) for internal erosion control in gravel–sand mixtures. Geotechnique 67(1):42–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jiang NJ, Soga K, Kuo M (2016) Microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) for seepage-induced internal erosion control in sand–clay mixtures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 143(3):04016100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee MJ, Choi SK, Lee W (2002) Shear strength of artificially cemented sands. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 27(3):201–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin H, Suleiman MT, Brown DG, Kavazanjian E (2016) Mechanical behavior of sands treated by microbially induced carbonate precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 142(2):04015066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu YS, Tian QY, Lv JB (2005) Study on the quality evaluation method of coarse sand in the backfill of highway bridge. Highway 12:55–58 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Manning DAC (2008) Biological enhancement of soil carbonate precipitation: passive removal of atmospheric CO2. Miner Mag 72(2):639–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Martinez BC, Dejong JT, Ginnter TR et al (2013) Experimental optimization of microbial induced-carbonate precipitation for soil improvement. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 139(4):587–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Maryam, N. (2014). Biocementation of sand in geotechnical engineering. In: Proceedings of international conference on computer design: VLSI in computers and processors, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, pp 275–281

  36. Montoya BM, Dejong JT (2015) Stress–strain behavior of sands cemented by microbially induced calcite precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(6):04015019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. MOT China (2007) Code for design of ground base and foundation of highway bridges and culverts. JTG, D63-2007

  38. O’Donnell ST, Kavazanjian E (2015) Stiffness and dilatancy improvements in uncemented sands treated through MICP. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(11):02815004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sasaki T, Kuwano R (2016) Undrained cyclic triaxial testing on sand with non-plastic fines content cemented with microbially induced CaCO3. Soils Found 56(3):485–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Van Paassen LA (2011) Bio-mediated ground improvement: from laboratory experiment to pilot applications. In: Proceedings of geofrontiers 2011: advances in geotechnical engineering., Dallas, TX, USA, pp 4099–4108

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51608169, No. 41630638, No. 51609093), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFC0800205), the Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. BK20150814), the 111 Project (Ministry of Education of China, No. B13024), the Ministry of Education, Singapore (No. MOE2015-T2-2-142), and Centre for Usable Space, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, China

    Yufeng Gao, Lei Hang & Jia He

  2. Jiangsu Research Center for Geotechnical Engineering Technology, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, China

    Jia He

  3. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

    Jian Chu

Authors
  1. Yufeng Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lei Hang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jia He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jian Chu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jia He.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, Y., Hang, L., He, J. et al. Mechanical behaviour of biocemented sands at various treatment levels and relative densities. Acta Geotech. 14, 697–707 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0729-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0729-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation