Abstract
The pre-bored grouted planted pile is a new type of composite pile foundation that consists of a precast concrete pile and the surrounding cemented soil. A series of shear tests were conducted in a specific shear test apparatus to investigate the shaft capacity of the different pile–soil interfaces. The test results show that the frictional capacity of the cemented soil–sand interface is controlled mainly by the sand properties, while the strength of the cemented soil slightly influences the interface properties by affecting the normalized roughness coefficient Rn. The frictional capacity of the concrete–sand interface is similar to the frictional capacity of the cemented soil–sand interface, and the existence of mud cake layer virtually hampers the frictional properties of the interface. The maximum skin friction of the concrete–cemented soil interface increases approximately linearly with the increasing cemented soil strength, and the value of the maximum skin friction is much larger than that of the cemented soil–sand interface of identical cemented soil strength, which demonstrates the integrity of the pre-bored grouted planted pile in the load transfer process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
API (2010) Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms-working stress design, API RP2A, 20th edn. American Petroleum Institute, Washington
Bolton MD (1986) The strength and dilatancy of sands. Geotechnique 36(1):65–78
Boulon M, Foray P (1986) Physical and numerical simulation of lateral shaft friction along offshore piles in sand. In: Proceedings of 3rd international conference on numerical methods in offshore piling, Nantes, pp 127–147
Chu LM, Yin JH (2005) Comparison of interface shear strength of soil nails measured by both direct shear box tests and pullout tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(9):1097–1107
Desai CS, Drumm EC, Zaman MM (1985) Cyclic testing and modeling of interfaces. J Geotech Eng 111(6):793–815
Desai CS, Pradhan SK, Cohen D (2005) Cyclic testing and constitutive modeling of saturated sand–concrete interfaces using the disturbed state concept. Int J Geomech 5(4):286–294
Doherty P, Gavin K (2011) The shaft capacity of displacement piles in clay: a state of the art review. Geotech Geol Eng 29(4):389–410
Doherty P, Gavin K (2011) Shaft capacity of open-ended piles in clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(10):1090–1102
Fakharian K, Evgin E (1997) Cyclic simple-shear behavior of sand-steel interfaces under constant normal stiffness condition. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(12):1096–1105
Fioravante V (2002) On the shaft friction modelling of non-displacement piles in sand. Soils Found 42(2):23–33
Gavin KG, Lehane BM (2003) The shaft capacity of pipe piles in sand. Can Geotech J 40(1):36–45
Gavin KG, Cadogan D, Casey P (2009) Shaft capacity of continuous flight auger piles in sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(6):790–798
Kishida H, Uesugi M (1987) Tests of the interface between sand and steel in the simple shear apparatus. Geotechnique 37(1):45–52
Kraft LM, Focht JA, Amerasinghe SF (1981) Friction capacity of piles driven into clay. J Geotech Eng Div 107(11):1521–1541
Kraft LM, Ray RP, Kagawa T (1981) Theoretical t–z curves. J Geotech Eng Div 107(11):1543–1561
Kulhawy FH (1984) Limiting tip and side resistance: fact or fallacy? Analysis and design of pile foundations. ASCE, Reston, pp 80–98
Lehane BM, Gaudin C, Schneider JA (2005) Scale effects on tension capacity for rough piles buried in dense sand. Geotechnique 55(10):709–719
Loukidis D, Salgado R (2008) Analysis of the shaft resistance of non-displacement piles in sand. Geotechnique 58(4):283–296
Mascarucci Y, Miliziano S, Mandolini A (2014) A numerical approach to estimate shaft friction of bored piles in sands. Acta Geotech 9:547–560
O’Neill MW (2001) Side resistance in piles and drilled shafts. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(1):1–16
Peng SY, Ng CWW, Zheng G (2014) The dilatant behaviour of sand–pile interface subjected to loading and stress relief. Acta Geotech 9:425–437
Potyondy JG (1961) Skin friction between various soils and construction materials. Geotechnique 11(4):339–353
Randolph MF (2003) Science and empiricism in pile foundation design. Geotechnique 53(10):847–875
Randolph MF, Murphy BS (1985) Shaft capacity of driven piles in clay. In: Offshore technology conference, Houston, pp 371–378
Randolph MF, Wroth CP (1981) Application of the failure state in undrained simple shear to the shaft capacity of driven piles. Geotechnique 31(1):143–157
Yang J, Tham LG, Lee PKK, Chan ST, Yu F (2006) Behavior of jacked and driven piles in sandy soil. Geotechnique 56(4):245–259
Zhou JJ, Wang KH, Gong XN, Zhang RH (2013) Bearing capacity and load transfer mechanism of a static drill rooted nodular pile in soft soil areas. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A Appl Phys Eng 14(10):705–719
Zhou JJ, Gong XN, Wang KH, Zhang RH (2015) Behavior of the static drill rooted nodular piles under tension. Chin J Geotech Eng 37(3):570–576 (in Chinese)
Zhou JJ, Gong XN, Wang KH, Zhang RH, Yan TL (2016) A model test on the behavior of a static drill rooted nodular pile under compression. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 34(3):150429065916002
Zhou JJ, Gong XN, Wang KH, Zhang RH, Yan JJ (2017) Testing and modeling the behavior of pre-bored grouting planted piles under compression and tension. Acta Geotech 12:1061–1075
Acknowledgements
Our great appreciation goes to the reviewers and the editorial board for reviewing and commenting on this paper. This research is funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51578498 and 51579217), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (2017M611995). Gratitude is also expressed to the staff of the laboratory and the research and development department of ZCONE High-tech Pile Industry Holdings Co., Ltd. for assisting with the pile–soil interface shear tests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, Jj., Gong, Xn., Wang, Kh. et al. Shaft capacity of the pre-bored grouted planted pile in dense sand. Acta Geotech. 13, 1227–1239 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0643-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0643-8