Analysis of noncommensurate sampling effects on the performance of PN code tracking loops

  • Jian Yang
  • YiKang Yang
  • JiSheng Li
  • HengNian Li
  • TianShe Yang
Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Noncoherent early-late processing (NELP) code tracking loops are often implemented using digital hardware for digital global positioning system (GPS) receivers. Noncommensurate sampling technology is widely used because it is viewed as an effective solution to cope with the drawback of digital effects. However, the relationship between the sampling rate and auto-correlation function (ACF) is not adequately characterized by traditional analysis. The principles for selecting the sampling rate are still not apparent. In order to solve this problem, we first analyzed the effects of different sampling rates on ACF and obtained the analytical form of a discrete auto-correlation function (DACF) for a noncommensurate sampling rate. Based on the result, the relationship between the step variation in DACF and NELP parameters such as sampling rate, integration time, and correlator spacing was determined. The maximum step variation size of DACF was also determined. However, considering the actual situation, additional factors such as code Doppler shift, precorrelation filter, and thermal noise may degrade the step variation of DACF. The relationship between the step variation and these factors was analyzed separately. An appropriate sampling rate and appropriate correlator spacing were proposed to achieve the typical accuracy of measurement. The numerical simulation verified the validity of the above theoretical analyses, and finally, the conclusions and design constraints for the digital GPS receiver are summarized.

Keywords

sampling rate code tracking loops heat dissipation GPS digital receiver 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Meyr H. Delay-lock tracking of stochastic signals. IEEE Trans Commun, 1976, 24: 331–339CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Polydoros A, Weber C. Analysis and optimization of correlative codetracking loops in spread-spectrum systems. IEEE Trans Commun, 1985, 33: 30–43CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Simon M. Noncoherent pseudonoise code tracking performance of spread spectrum receivers. IEEE Trans Commun, 1977, 25: 327–345CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Betz J W, Kolodziejski K R. Generalized theory of code tracking with an early-late discriminator Part I: Lower bound and coherent processing. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 2009, 45: 1538–1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Betz J W, Kolodziejski K R. Generalized theory of code tracking with an early-late discriminator Part II: Noncoherent processing and numerical results. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 2009, 45: 1557–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thomas J. Signal-processing theory for the TurboRogue receiver. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report, 1995Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Quirk K J, Srinivasan M. Analysis of sampling and quantization effects on the performance of PN code tracking loops. In: IEEE International Conference on Conference: Communications, 2002. New York: IEEE, 2002. 1480–1484Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu L, Amin M G. Performance analysis of GPS receivers in non-Gaussian noise incorporating precorrelation filter and sampling rate. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2008, 56: 990–1004MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quirk K J, Srinivasan M. PN code tracking using noncommensurate sampling. IEEE Trans Commun, 2006, 54: 1845–1856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yuan C, Yuan H, Xu Y, et al. The study on pseudorange error caused by sampling process for GNSS Receiver. In: Proceedings of 2013 China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013. 525–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang J, Yang Y K, Li J S, et al. A novel satellite-equipped receiver for autonomous monitoring of GNSS navigation signal quality. Sci China Tech Sci, 2016, 59: 1137–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jin Z, Zhang C, Xu Z, et al. Simple approach to determining parameters of noncommensurate sampling for optimal pseudo-noise code phase delay discrimination. Electron Lett, 2014, 50: 283–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lo Presti L, Zhu X, Fantino M, et al. GNSS signal acquisition in the presence of sign transition. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process, 2009, 3: 557–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu Y, Ran Y, Ke T, et al. Code tracking performance analysis of GNSS signal in the presence of CW interference. Signal Process, 2011, 91: 970–987CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Balaei A T, Dempster A G, Presti L L. Characterization of the effects of CW and pulse CW interference on the GPS signal quality. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 2009, 45: 1418–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaplan E, Hegarty C. Understanding GPS: Principles and Applications. 2nd ed. London: Artech House, 2005. 141–148Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu H, Zhang R F, Liu J N, et al. Time synchronization in communication networks based on the Beidou foundation enhancement system. Sci China Tech Sci, 2016, 59: 9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jian Yang
    • 1
  • YiKang Yang
    • 1
  • JiSheng Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • HengNian Li
    • 2
  • TianShe Yang
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Electronic and Information EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory Astronautic Dynamics (ADL)Xi’an Satellite Control CenterXi’anChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory for Fault Diagnosis and Maintenance of Spacecraft in OrbitXi’an Satellite Control CenterXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations