Science China Technological Sciences

, Volume 61, Issue 4, pp 506–515 | Cite as

Numerical investigation on gas flow heat transfer and pressure drop in the shell side of spiral-wound heat exchangers

  • QiXiong Tang
  • GaoFei Chen
  • ZhiQiang Yang
  • Jun Shen
  • MaoQiong Gong


As a critical facility, spiral-wound heat exchanger (SWHE) has been widely used in many industrial applications. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was employed with the smallest periodic element and periodic boundary conditions to examine the characteristics of the shell side of SWHE. Numerical simulation results show that the heat transfer coefficients around the tube initially increase and subsequently decrease with radial angle because of the influence of backflow and turbulent separation. The mean absolute deviation between simulated heat transfer coefficients and measured values for methane, ethane, nitrogen and a mixture (methane/ethane) is within 5% when Reynolds number is over 30000. For the pressure drop, the simulated values are smaller than the measured values, and the mean absolute deviation is within 9%. Numerical simulation results also indicate that the pressure drop and heat transfer coefficients on the shell side of SWHE decrease as the winding angle of the tubes increases. Considering the effect of winding angle on pressure drops and heat transfer coefficients, the modified correlations of Nusselt number Nu = 0.308Re0.64Pr0.36(1 + sinθ)-1.38 and friction factor f = 0.435Re-0.133(sinθ)-0.36, are proposed. Comparing with the experimental data, the maximum deviations for heat transfer coefficients and pressure drops are less than 5% and 11% respectively.


spiral-wound heat exchangers CFD heat transfer pressure drop shell side 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kanoglu M, Dincer I, Rosen M A. Performance analysis of gas liquefaction cycles. Int J Energy Res, 2008, 32: 35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen Y D, Zhou B, Ceng P. Research progress in heat transfer technology in LNG plants (in Chinese). Nat Gas Ind, 2012, 32: 80–85Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang T, Ding G, Duan Z, et al. A distributed-parameter model for LNG spiral wound heat exchanger based on graph theory. Appl Thermal Eng, 2015, 81: 102–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang T, Ding G, Ren T, et al. A mathematical model of floating LNG spiral-wound heat exchangers under rolling conditions. Appl Thermal Eng, 2016, 99: 959–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duan Z, Ren T, Ding G, et al. A dynamic model for FLNG spiral wound heat exchanger with multiple phase-change streams based on moving boundary method. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 2016, 34: 657–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pu H, Chen J. Application and technical analysis on localization of spiral-wound heat exchanger in large-scale natural gas liquefaction plan (in Chinese). Refrig Technol, 2011, 3: 26–29Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weikl M C, Braun K, Weiss J. Coil-wound heat exchangers for molten salt applications. Energy Procedia, 2014, 49: 1054–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reithmeier H, Steinbauer M, Stockmann R, et al. Industrial scale testing of a spiral wound heat exchanger. In: 14th International Conference & Exhibition on Liquefied Natural Gas. Doha, 2004Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fredheim A O. Thermal design of coil-wound LNG heat exchangers, shell-side heat transfer and pressure drop. Dissertation of Doctoral Degree. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 1994Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aunan B. Shell-side heat transfer and pressure drop in coil-wound LNG heat exchangers, laboratory measurements and modeling. Dissertation of Doctoral Degree. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2000Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Neeraas B O, Fredheim A O, Aunan B. Experimental shell-side heat transfer and pressure drop in gas flow for spiral-wound LNG heat exchanger. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2004, 47: 353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neeraas B O, Fredheim A O, Aunan B. Experimental data and model for heat transfer, in liquid falling film flow on shell-side, for spiralwound LNG heat exchanger. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2004, 47: 3565–3572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Messa C J, Foust A S, Poehlein G W. Shell-side heat transfer coefficients in helical coil heat exchangers. Ind Eng Chem Proc Des Dev, 1969, 8: 343–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Genic S B, Jacimovic B M, Jaric M S, et al. Research on the shell-side thermal performances of heat exchangers with helical tube coils. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2012, 55: 4295–4300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duan R Q, Jiang S Y. Numerical investigation of gas flow distribution and thermal mixing in helically coiled tube bundle. J Nucl Sci Technol, 2008, 45: 704–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jia J C. Numerical analysis geometry parameters on heat transfer for spiral-wound heat exchanger (in Chinese). Fluid Mach, 2011, 39: 33–37Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu Z Y, Chen J, Pu H, et al. Numerical simulation of superheated flow of refrigerant at shell side of LNG spiral wound heat exchanger (in Chinese). Gas Heat, 2014, 34: 6–11Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zeng M, Zhang G, Li Y, et al. Geometrical parametric analysis of flow and heat transfer in the shell side of a spiral-wound heat exchanger. Heat Transfer Eng, 2014, 36: 790–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lu X, Du X P, Zhang S, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on shell-side performance of multilayer spiral-wound heat exchangers. Chem Eng Trans, 2013, 35: 445–450Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lu X, Zhang G, Chen Y, et al. Effect of geometrical parameters on flow and heat transfer performances in multi-stream spiral-wound heat exchangers. Appl Thermal Eng, 2015, 89: 1104–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Haskins D A, El-Genk M S. CFD analyses and correlation of pressure losses on the shell-side of concentric, helically-coiled tubes heat exchangers. Nucl Eng Des, 2016, 305: 531–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li J R, Chen J, Pu H, et al. Simulation of falling film flow and heat transfer at shell-side of coil-wound heat exchanger (in Chinese). CIESC J, 2015, 66: 40–48Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang S, Jian G, Xiao J, et al. Optimization investigation on configuration parameters of spiral-wound heat exchanger using genetic aggregation response surface and multi-objective genetic algorithm. Appl Thermal Eng, 2017, 119: 603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nam K W, Jeong J H, Kim K S, et al. The effects of heat transfer evaluation methods on Nusselt number for mini-channel tube bundles. In: 3rd International Conference on Thermal Issues in Emerging Technologies Theory and Applications. Cairo: IEEE, 2010Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Martinez E, Vicente W, Salinas-Vazquez M, et al. Numerical simulation of turbulent air flow on a single isolated finned tube module with periodic boundary conditions. Int J Thermal Sci, 2015, 92: 58–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beale S B, Spalding D B. Numerical study of fluid flow and heat transfer in tube banks with stream-wise periodic boundary conditions. Trans Can Soc Mech Eng, 1998, 22: 397–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Beale S B. Use of streamwise periodic boundary conditions for problems in heat and mass transfer. J Heat Transfer, 2007, 129: 601–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yu X F, Wang Z Y, Li Q Y, et al. Numerical simulation of periodically fully developed flow and heat transfer in crossflow over intensive tube banks (in Chinese). J Shanghai Univ Sci Techno, 2015, 37: 563–567Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ridluan A, Tokuhiro A. Benchmark simulation of turbulent flow through a staggered tube bundle to support CFD as a reactor design tool. Part II: URANS CFD simulation. J Nucl Sci Technol, 2008, 45: 1305–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hill S, Acher T, Hoffmann R, et al. CFD simulation of the hydrodynamics in structured packings. In: 9th International Conference on Multiphase Flow. Firenze, 2016Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Haroun Y, Raynal L, Alix P. Prediction of effective area and liquid hold-up in structured packings by CFD. Chem Eng Res Des, 2014, 92: 2247–2254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fernandes J, Simões P C, Mota J P B, et al. Application of CFD in the study of supercritical fluid extraction with structured packing: Dry pressure drop calculations. J Supercrit Fluids, 2008, 47: 17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mahr B, Mewes D. CFD modelling and calculation of dynamic twophase flow in columns equipped with structured packing. Chem Eng Res Des, 2007, 85: 1112–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kenig E Y. Complementary modelling of fluid separation processes. Chem Eng Res Des, 2008, 86: 1059–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Egorov Y, Menter F, Klöker M, et al. On the combination of CFD and rate-based modelling in the simulation of reactive separation processes. Chem Eng Process, 2005, 44: 631–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Huang J, Li M, Sun Z, et al. Hydrodynamics of layered wire gauze packing. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2015, 54: 4871–4878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lemmon E W, Huber M L, Mclindon M O. NIST Standard Database 23. Version 9.1. Applied Chemicals and Materials Division, 2013Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Abadzic E E. Heat transfer on coiled tubular matrix. In: ASME Winter Annual Meeting. New York, 1974Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kast W, Nirschl H, Gaddis ES, et al. L1 pressure drop in single phase flow. In: VDI-GVC, Ed. VDI Heat Atlas. 2nd Ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2010. 1053–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • QiXiong Tang
    • 1
    • 2
  • GaoFei Chen
    • 1
  • ZhiQiang Yang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jun Shen
    • 1
  • MaoQiong Gong
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Cryogenics, Technical Institute of Physics and ChemistryChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations