Advertisement

Science China Technological Sciences

, Volume 61, Issue 4, pp 623–632 | Cite as

Test particle simulation on the ion and electron zebra stripes and their time evolution in inner radiation belt

  • YongFu Wang
  • QiuGang Zong
  • XuZhi Zhou
Article

Abstract

During February 15–16, 2014, the energetic electron spectrogram for four successive inner radiation belt crossing show clearly the electron zebra structures and their time evolution which last for about 17 h. Unfortunately, the time of flight (TOF) in RBSPICE measurement is turned off below 3RE, and the ion measurement is contaminated by electrons. Thus in this study we studied the differences between the ion and electron zebra stripe structures and their time evolution using simple theory and test particle simulation, combining the electron measurement from RBSIPICE onboard Van Allen Probes. Theoretical analysis predicts that the ion zebra stripe structures should lie at a higher energy range than the corresponding electron zebra stripe structures due to that the directions of gradient B drift and corotation E×B drift are the same for electrons while opposite for ions. Test particle simulation with the dipole magnetic field and Volland-Stern electric field model have shown that the ion and electron zebra stripe structures could be produced by the convection electric field penetrating into the inner magnetosphere in this event, with their time evolution determined by total drift velocity that are different for ions and electrons. The predicted differences between the ion and electron zebra stripe structures are partially verified through observation. The ion zebra stripe structures could have potential influence to the ring current.

Keywords

inner radiation belt ion zebra stripes energetic ions energetic electrons 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sauvaud J A, Walt M, Delcourt D, et al. Inner radiation belt particle acceleration and energy structuring by drift resonance with ULF waves during geomagnetic storms. J Geophys Res Space Phys, 2013, 118: 1723–1736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ukhorskiy A Y, Sitnov M I, Mitchell D G, et al. Rotationally driven ‘zebra stripes’ in Earth’s inner radiation belt. Nature, 2014, 507: 338–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mitchell D G, Lanzerotti L J, Kim C K, et al. Radiation belt storm probes ion composition experiment (RBSPICE). Space Sci Rev, 2013, 179: 263–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu Y, Zong Q G, Zhou X Z, et al. Structure and evolution of electron “zebra stripes” in the inner radiation belt. J Geophys Res Space Phys, 2016, 121: 4145–4157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daglis I A. Ring current dynamics. Space Sci Rev, 2006, 124: 183–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daglis I A, Thorne R M, Baumjohann W, et al. The terrestrial ring current: Origin, formation, and decay. Rev Geophys, 1999, 37: 407–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lejosne S, Roederer J G. The “zebra stripes”: An effect of F region zonal plasma drifts on the longitudinal distribution of radiation belt particles. J Geophys Res Space Phys, 2016, 121: 507–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roederer J G. Dynamics of Geomagnetically Trapped Radiation. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li X, Hudson M, Chan A, et al. Loss of ring current O+ ions due to interaction with Pc 5 waves. J Geophys Res, 1993, 98: 215–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baumjohann W, Treumann R A. Basic Space Plasma Physics. London: World Scientific, 1997zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wolf R A, Spiro R W, Sazykin S, et al. How the Earth’s inner magnetosphere works: An evolving picture. J Atmos Sol-Terrestrial Phys, 2007, 69: 288–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rowland D E, Wygant J R. Dependence of the large-scale, inner magnetospheric electric field on geomagnetic activity. J Geophys Res, 1998, 103: 14959–14964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Califf S, Li X, Blum L, et al. THEMIS measurements of quasi-static electric fields in the inner magnetosphere. J Geophys Res Space Phys, 2014, 119: 9939–9951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elkington S R, Hudson M K, Chan A A. Resonant acceleration and diffusion of outer zone electrons in an asymmetric geomagnetic field. J Geophys Res, 2003, 108: 1116–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jeong G Y. Bulk and single-particle mineralogy of Asian dust and a comparison with its source soils. J Geophys Res, 2008, 113: 2208–2217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Volland H. A semiempirical model of large-scale magnetospheric electric fields. J Geophys Res, 1973, 78: 171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Korth H, Thomsen M F, Borovsky J E, et al. Plasma sheet access to geosynchronous orbit. J Geophys Res, 1999, 104: 25047–25061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xiao F, Zhou Q, Li C, et al. Modeling solar energetic particle by a relativistic kappa-type distribution. Plasma Phys Control Fusion, 2008, 50: 062001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xiao F, Shen C, Wang Y, et al. Energetic electron distributions fitted with a relativistic kappatype function at geosynchronous orbit. J Geophys Res, 2008, 113: A05203Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weimer D R. Models of high-latitude electric potentials derived with a least error fit of spherical harmonic coefficients. J Geophys Res, 1995, 100: 19595–19608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weimer D R. Improved ionospheric electrodynamic models and application to calculating Joule heating rates. J Geophys Res, 2005, 110: A05306Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Matsui H, Jordanova V K, Quinn J M, et al. Derivation of electric potential patterns in the inner magnetosphere from Cluster EDI data: Initial results. J Geophys Res, 2004, 109: A10202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Matsui H, Puhl-Quinn P A, Jordanova V K, et al. Derivation of inner magnetospheric electric field (UNH-IMEF) model using Cluster data set. Ann Geophys, 2008, 26: 2887–2898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matsui H, Torbert R B, Spence H E, et al. Revision of empirical electric field modeling in the inner magnetosphere using Cluster data. J Geophys Res Space Phys, 2013, 118: 4119–4134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wygant J, Rowland D, Singer H J, et al. Experimental evidence on the role of the large spatial scale electric field in creating the ring current. J Geophys Res, 1998, 103: 29527–29544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Southwood D J. The role of hot plasma in magnetospheric convection. J Geophys Res, 1977, 82: 5512–5520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Southwood D J, Wolf R A. An assessment of the role of precipitation in magnetospheric convection. J Geophys Res, 1978, 83: 5227–5232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Su Z, Zhu H, Xiao F, et al. Ultra-low-frequency wave-driven diffusion of radiation belt relativistic electrons. Nat Commun, 2015, 6, doi: 101038/ncomms10096Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, School of Physics, and Fusion Simulation CenterPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Space Physics and Applied TechnologyPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Earth and Planetary PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations