Skip to main content
Log in

Two-phase smooth particle hydrodynamics modeling of air-water interface in aerated flows

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The large deformations associated with air and water interactions are critical factors that affect the hydrodynamic characteristics of hydraulic structures. As a type of Lagrange meshless particle method, smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) has been shown to have many advantages when modeling the interface flow and tracing the free surface because the particles inherit the velocity, mass, and density properties. Significant theoretical and numerical studies have been performed recently in this area. In the present study, a two-phase SPH framework was developed based on these previous studies and we explored its capacity to capture the main features of large density ratio aerated flows. The cohesive pressure was included only in the momentum equation of the air phase for additional amendments to ensure the stability and accuracy of the two-phase SPH model. Three case studies were performed to test the performance of the two-phase SPH model. A convergence study demonstrated the need to balance the CPU time consumption and the real-time requirements. A dam-break simulation based on pressure variation in the air pocket showed the superior analytical performance of the two-phase model compared with the single-phase model. The results of a hydraulic jump simulation were compared with the theoretical results in order to understand the collision between the solid and liquid using the SPH method more clearly. Thus, the consistency between the simulation and the theoretical and experimental results demonstrated the feasibility and stability of the two-phase SPH framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hirt C W, Nichols B D. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys, 1981, 39: 201–225

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Monaghan J J. Simulating free surface flows with SPH. J Comput Phys, 1994, 110: 339–406

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu G R, Liu M B. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: A meshfree particle method. World Scientific, London, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lucy L B. A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. Astron J, 1977, 82: 1013–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gingold R A, Monaghan J J. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics -theory and application to non-spherical stars. Mon Not R Astron Soc, 1977, 181: 375–389

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Monaghan J J. Gravity currents and solitary waves. Physica D, 1996, 98: 523–533

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Monaghan J J. SPH compressible turbulence. Mon Not R Astron Soc, 2002, 335: 843–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Monaghan J J. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Annu Rev Astron Astr, 1992, 30: 543–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. López D, Marivela R, Garrote L. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics model applied to hydraulic structure: a hydraulic jump test case. J Hydraul Res, 2010, 48: 142–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Faltinsen O M, Landrini M, Greco M. Slamming in marine applications. J Eng Math, 2004, 48: 187–217

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun J W, Liang S X, Sun Z C, et al. A Two-phase simulation of wave impact on a horizontal deck based on SPH method. J Mar Sci Appl, 2010, 9, 372–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Colagrossi A, Landrini M. Numerical simulation of interfacial flows by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J Comput Phys, 2003, 191: 448–475

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen Z, Zong Z, Liu M B, et al. An SPH model for multiphase flows with complex interfaces and large density differences. J Comput Phys, 2015, 283: 169–188

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang M, Deng X L. A sharp interface method for SPH. J Comput Phys, 2015, 302: 469–484

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Z B, Chen R, Wang H, et al. An overview of smoothed particle hydrodynamics for simulating multiphase flow. Appl Math Model, 2016, 40: 9625–9655

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Monaghan J J, Kos A M. Solitary waves on a cretan beach. J Waterw Port C-ASCE, 1999, 125: 145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Crespo A J C, Dominguez J M, Rogers B D,et al. DualSPHysics: open-source parallel CFD solver based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH). Comput Phys Commun, 2015, 187: 204–216

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Molteni, D., Colagrossi, A. A simple procedure to improve the pressure evaluation in hydrodynamic context using the SPH. Comput Phys Commun, 2009, 180: 861–872

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Nugent S, Posch H A. Liquid drops and surface tension with smoothed particle applied mechanics. Phys Rev E, 2000, 64: 4968–4975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mokos A, Rogers B D, Stansby P K, et al. Multiphase SPH modelling of violent Hydrodynamics on GPUs. Comput Phys Commun, 2015, 196: 304–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shao S. Incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulation of multifluid flows. Int J Numer Meth Fl, 2012, 69: 1715–1735

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Issa R, Lee E S, Violeau D, et al. Incompressible separated flows simulations with the smoothed particle hydrodynamics gridless method. Int J Numer Meth Fl, 2004, 47: 1101–1106

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Monaghan J J. On the problem of penetration in particle methods. J Comput Phys, 1989, 82: 1–15

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiao P G, Zhou Y Q, Li Z R, et al. Simulation of two phase flow using smooth particle hydrodynamics. IEEE KAM 2008 Workshop. Wuhan: IEEE, 2009. 296–300

    Google Scholar 

  25. Verlet L. Computer “experiments” on classical fluids. I. Thermodynamical properties of Lennard-Jones molecules. Health Phys, 1967, 159: 98–103

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang A M, Sun P N, Ming F R. An SPH modeling of bubble rising and coalescing in three dimensions. Comput Method Appl M, 2015, 294: 189–209

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Gomez-Gesteira M, Rogers B D, Crespo A J C, et al. SPHysics–development of a free-surface fluid solver–Part 1: Theory and formulations. Comput Geosci-UK, 2012, 48: 289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gomez-Gesteira M, Rogers B D, Dalrymple R A, et al. State-of-theart classical SPH for free-surface flows. J Hydraul Res, 2009, 48: 6–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou Z Q, Kat J O D, Buchner B. A nonlinear 3-D approach to simulate GREEN WATER dynamics on deck. In: Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Nantes: 1999

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jonsson P, PÄR Jonsén P, Andreasson P, et al. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics modeling of hydraulic jumps. International Conference on Particle-based Methods–Fundamentals and Applications, 2011, 97: 373–379

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chanson H. Hydraulics of open channel flow, 2nd ed. Oxford, London, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liu Z W, Chen Y C, Zhu D J. Study on the concentration distribution in a trapezoidal open-channel flow with a side discharge. Environ Fluid Mech, 2007, 7: 509–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ran Li or JingJie Feng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, H., Li, R., Lin, P. et al. Two-phase smooth particle hydrodynamics modeling of air-water interface in aerated flows. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 60, 479–490 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-0586-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-0586-5

Keywords

Navigation