Skip to main content
Log in

Fuzzy energy management strategy for parallel HEV based on pigeon-inspired optimization algorithm

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improvements in fuel consumption and emissions of hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) heavily depend upon an efficient energy management strategy (EMS). This paper presents an optimizing fuzzy control strategy of parallel hybrid electric vehicle employing a quantum chaotic pigeon-inspired optimization (QCPIO) algorithm. In this approach, the torque of the engine and the motor is assigned by a fuzzy torque distribution controller which is based on the battery state of charge (SoC) and the required torque of the hybrid powertrain. The rules and membership functions of the fuzzy torque distribution controller are optimized simultaneously through the use of QCPIO algorithm. The simulation ground on ADVISOR demonstrates that this EMS improves fuel economy more effectually than original fuzzy and PSO_Fuzzy EMS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson V H, Wipke K B, Rausen D J. HEV control strategy for realtime optimization of fuel economy and emissions. McCarthy, 2000, 1: 1543–1557

    Google Scholar 

  2. Park J. Development of equivalent fuel consumption minimization strategy for hybrid electric vehicles. Int J Automotive Tech, 2012, 13: 835–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Patil R M, Filipi Z, Fathy H K. Comparison of supervisory control strategies for series plug-in hybrid electric vehicle powertrains through dynamic programming. IEEE T Contr Syst T, 2014, 22: 502–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zou Y, Liu T, Sun F, et al. Comparative study of dynamic programming and Pontryagin’s minimum principle on energy management for a parallel hybrid electric vehicle. Energies, 2013, 6: 2305–2318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Borhan H, Vahidi A, Phillips A M, et al. MPC-based energy management of a power-split hybrid electric vehicle. IEEE T Contr Syst T, 2012, 20: 593–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xia C, Zhang C. Power management strategy of hybrid electric vehicles based on quadratic performance index. Energies, 2015, 8: 12458–12473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee H D, Sul S K. Fuzzy-logic-based torque control strategy for parallel- type hybrid electric vehicle. IEEE T Indust Electr, 1998, 45: 625–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pu J H, Yin C L, Zhang J W. Fuzzy torque control strategy for parallel hybrid electronic vehicles. Int J Automotive Tech, 2005, 6: 529–536

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xing J, He H W, Zhang X W. Genetic-fuzzy HEV control strategy based on driving cycle recognition. High Tech Lett, 2010, 16: 39–44

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou M L, Lu D K, Li W M, et al. Optimized fuzzy logic control strategy for parallel hybrid electric vehicle based on genetic algorithm. Appl Mech Mater, 2013, 274: 345–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu J, Zhang C H, Cui N X. Fuzzy energy management strategy for a hybrid electric vehicle based on driving cycle recognition. Int J Automotive Tech, 2012, 13: 1159–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Su Y X, Chi R. Multi-objective particle swarm-differential evolution algorithm. Neural Comput Appl, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00521-015-2073-y

    Google Scholar 

  13. Murphey Y L, Chen Z H, Kiliaris L, et al. Intelligent power management in a vehicular system with multiple power sources. Power Sources, 2011, 196: 835–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun Y, Chen Z, Yan B J, et al. A learning method for energy optimization of the plug-in hybrid electric bus. Sci China Tech Sci, 2015, 58: 1242–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu J, Zhang C H, Cui N X. PSO algorithm-based parameter optimization for HEV powertrain and its control strategy. Int J Automotive Tech, 2008, 9: 53–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duan H B, Qiao P. Pigeon-inspired optimization: A new swarm intelligence optimizer for air robot path planning. Int J Intell Comput Cybern, 2014, 7: 24–37

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Guilford T, Roberts S, Biro D. Positional entropy during pigeon homing II: Navigational interpretation of Bayesian latent state models. J Theor Biol, 2004, 227: 25–38

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Mora C, Davison C, Wild J, et al. Magnetoreception and its trigeminal mediation in the homing pigeon. Nature, 2004, 432: 508–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. AI A N. New dimensions in non-classical neural computing, part II: Quantum, nano, and optical. Int J Intell Comput Cybern, 2008, 2: 513–573

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Jeong Y W, Park J B, Jang S H, et al. A new quantum-inspired binary PSO: Application to unit commitment problems for power systems. IEEE T Power Syst, 2010, 25: 1486–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liao X, Zhou J, Ouyang S, et al. An adaptive chaotic artificial bee colony algorithm for short-term hydrothermal generation scheduling. Int J Elect Power, 2013, 53: 34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tavazoei M S, Haeri M. Comparison of different one-dimensional maps as chaotic search pattern in chaos optimization algorithms. Appl Mat Comput, 2007, 187: 1076–1085

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuan X, Wang P, Yuan Y, et al. A new quantum inspired chaotic artificial bee colony algorithm for optimal power flow problem. Energy Conv Manag, 2015, 100: 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to DanHong Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pei, J., Su, Y. & Zhang, D. Fuzzy energy management strategy for parallel HEV based on pigeon-inspired optimization algorithm. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 60, 425–433 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-0485-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-0485-8

Keywords

Navigation