Skip to main content
Log in

Remote sensing and census based assessment and scope for improvement of rice and wheat water productivity in the Indo-Gangetic Basin

  • Published:
Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding of crop water productivity (WP) over large scale, e.g., river basin, has significant implications for sustainable basin development planning. This paper presents a simplified approach to combine remote sensing, census and weather data to analyze basin rice and wheat WP in Indo-Gangetic River Basin, South Asia. A crop dominance map is synthesized from ground truth data and three existing LULC maps. National statistics on crop area and production information are collected and the yield is interpolated to pixel level using moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Crop evapotranspiration is mapped using simplified surface energy balance (SSEB) model with MODIS land surface temperature products and meteorological data collected from 56 weather stations. The average ET by rice and wheat is 368 mm and 210 mm respectively, accounting for only 69% and 65% of potential ET, and 67% and 338% of rainfall of the crop growth period measured from Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission (TRMM). Average WP for rice and wheat is 0.84 and 1.36 kg/m3 respectively. WP variability generally follows the same trend as shown by crop yield disregarding climate and topography changes. Sum of rice-wheat water productivity, however, exhibits different variability leading to better understanding of irrigation water management as wheat heavily relies on irrigation. Causes for variations and scope for improvement are also analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Molden D, Frenken K, Barker R, et al. Trends in water and agricultural development. In: Molden D. Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. London: Earthscan, 2007. 57–89

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosegrant M W, Ringler C, Gerpacio R V. Water and land resources and global food supply. In: 23rd International Conference of Agricultural Economists on Food Security, Diversification, and Resource Management: Refocusing the Role of Agriculture. Sacramento: Dartmouth Publishing Co. Ltd., 1999

    Google Scholar 

  3. Molden D, Murray-Rust H, Sakthivadivel R, et al. A water-productivity framework for understanding and action. In: Kijne J W, Barker R, Molden D. Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement. Wallingford: CAB International, 2003. 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schmugge T J, Kustas W P, Ritchie J C, et al. Remote sensing in hydrology. Adv Water Resour, 2002, 25(8–12): 1367–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang P, Wu W, Zhou Q, et al. Research progress in crop yield estimation models based on spectral reflectance data (in Chinese). Trans CSAE, 2008, 24(10): 262–268

    Google Scholar 

  6. Courault D, Seguin B, Olioso A. Review on estimation of evapotranspi ration from remote sensing data: From empirical to numerical modeling approaches. Irrig Drain Syst, 2005, 19(3): 223–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Moulin S, Bondeau A, Delecolle R. Combining agricultural crop models and satellite observations: From field to regional scales. Int J Remote Sens, 1998, 19(6): 1021–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frolking S, Qiu J, Boles S, et al. Combining remote sensing and ground census data to develop new maps of the distribution of rice agriculture in China. Glob biogeochem Cycles, 2002, 16(4): 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frolking S, Xiao X, Zhuang Y, et al. Agricultural land-use in China: A comparison of area estimates from ground-based census and satellite-borne remote sensing. Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 1994, 8(5): 407–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McCoy R M. Field Methods in Remote Sensing. New York: Guilford Press, 2004. 159

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harvey J T. Estimating census district populations from satellite imagery: Some approaches and limitations. Int J Remote Sens, 2002, 23(10): 2071–2095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sutton P, Roberts D, Elvidge C, et al. Census from heaven: An estimate of the global human population using nighttime satellite imagery. Int J Remote Sens, 2001, 22(16): 3061–3076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hurtt G C, Rosentrater L, Frolking S, et al. Linking remote-sensing estimates of land cover and census statistics on land use to produce maps of land use of the conterminous United States. Glob Biogeochem Cycles, 2001, 15(3): 673–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mesev V. The use of census data in urban image classification. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens, 1998, 64(5): 431–438

    Google Scholar 

  15. Neto E R, Hamburger D S. Census data mining for land use classification. In: Cao L, Yu P S, Zhang C, et al. Data Mining for Business Applications. New York: Springer, 2009. 241–251

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Rindfuss R R, Stern P C. Linking remote sensing and social science: The need and the challenges. In: Liverman D, Moran E F, Rindfuss R R, et al. People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science. Washington: National Academy Press, 1998. 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shah T, Singh O P, Mukherji A. Groundwater irrigation and South Asian agriculture: Empirical analysis from a large scale survey of India, Pakistan, Nepal and Bangladesh. Hydrogeology J, 2006, 14(3): 286–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ullah M K, Habib Z, Muhammad S. Spatial Distribution of Reference and Potential Evapotranspiration across the Indus Basin Irrigation Systems. Technical Report, International Water Management Institute, Lahore, Pakistan, Working Paper 24. 2001

  19. Loveland T R, Reed B C, Brown J F, et al. Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data. Int J Remote Sens, 2000, 21(6–7): 1303–1330

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thenkabail P S, Biradar C M, Turral H, et al. An Irrigated Area Map of the World (1999) Derived from Remote Sensing. Technical Report, International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka, Research Report 105. 2006

  21. Xiao X, Boles S, Frolking S, et al. Mapping paddy rice agriculture in South and Southeast Asia using multi-temporal MODIS images. Remote Sens Environ 2006, 100(1): 95–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thenkabail P S, Gangadhararao P, Biggs T, et al. Spectral matching techniques to determine historical land use/land cover (LULC) and irrigated areas using time-series AVHRR pathfinder datasets in the Krishna River Basin, India. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens, 2007, 73(9): 1029–1040

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cai X L, Sharma B. A regional crop dominance map based on remote sensing, census and groundtruth data. In: International Conference on Food Security and Environmental Sustainability. Kharagpur: Indian Institute of Technology, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bastiaanssen W G M, Thiruvengadachari T, Sakthivadivel R, et al. Satellite remote sensing for estimating productivities of land and water. Int J Water Resour Dev, 1999, 15(1–2): 181–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Senay B G, Budde M, Verdin J P, et al. A coupled remote sensing and simplified surface energy balance approach to estimate actual evapotranspiration from irrigated fields. Sensors, 2007, 7(6): 979–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to XueLiang Cai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cai, X., Sharma, B. Remote sensing and census based assessment and scope for improvement of rice and wheat water productivity in the Indo-Gangetic Basin. Sci. China Ser. E-Technol. Sci. 52, 3300–3308 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-009-0346-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-009-0346-3

Keywords

Navigation