Crop 3D—a LiDAR based platform for 3D high-throughput crop phenotyping
- 248 Downloads
With the growing population and the reducing arable land, breeding has been considered as an effective way to solve the food crisis. As an important part in breeding, high-throughput phenotyping can accelerate the breeding process effectively. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is an active remote sensing technology that is capable of acquiring three-dimensional (3D) data accurately, and has a great potential in crop phenotyping. Given that crop phenotyping based on LiDAR technology is not common in China, we developed a high-throughput crop phenotyping platform, named Crop 3D, which integrated LiDAR sensor, high-resolution camera, thermal camera and hyperspectral imager. Compared with traditional crop phenotyping techniques, Crop 3D can acquire multi-source phenotypic data in the whole crop growing period and extract plant height, plant width, leaf length, leaf width, leaf area, leaf inclination angle and other parameters for plant biology and genomics analysis. In this paper, we described the designs, functions and testing results of the Crop 3D platform, and briefly discussed the potential applications and future development of the platform in phenotyping. We concluded that platforms integrating LiDAR and traditional remote sensing techniques might be the future trend of crop high-throughput phenotyping.
Keywordscrop breeding phenotypic traits data fusion LiDAR high-throughput integrated platform
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This work was supported by the Strategic Program of Molecular Module-Based Designer Breeding Systems (XDA08040107), and the Instrument Developing Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2014129).
- Andújar, D., Rueda-Ayala, V., Moreno, H., Rosell-Polo, J.R., Escolá, A., Valero, C., Gerhards, R., Fernández-Quintanilla, C., Dorado, J., and Griepentrog, H.W. (2013b). Discriminating crop, weeds and soil surface with a terrestrial LIDAR sensor. Sensors 13, 14662–14675.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Bruinsma, J. (2009). The Resource Outlook to 2050: by how much do land, water and crop yields need to increase by 2050? FAO Expert Meeting on How to Feed the World in 2050, Rome, Italy. pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
- Busemeyer, L., Mentrup, D., Möller, K., Wunder, E., Alheit, K., Hahn, V., Maurer, H.P., Reif, J.C., Würschum, T., Müller, J., Rahe, F., and Ruckelshausen, A. (2013). Breedvision—A multi-sensor platform for non-destructive field-based phenotyping in plant breeding. Sensors 13, 2830–2847.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Fujino, M., Endo, R., and Omasa K. (2002). Nondestructive instrumentation of water-stressed cucumber leaves: comparison among changes in spectral reflectance, stomatal conductance, psii yield and shape. Agri Inform Res 11, 161–170.Google Scholar
- Hoffmeister, D., Curdt, C., Tilly, N., and Bendig, J. (2010). 3D terrestrial laser scanning for field crop modelling. In: Workshop on Remote Sensing Methods forChange Detection and Process Modelling, V. Lenz-Wiedemann, G. Bareth, eds. pp.17–22.Google Scholar
- Liang, J., and Yang, J. (2007). Study on image process application in maize plant type (in Chinese). Acta Agron Sin 15, 146–148.Google Scholar
- Liang, Y., and Wang, Y. (2006). The genes controlling rice architecture and its application in breeding (in Chinese). Chin Bull of Life Sci 28, 1156–1167.Google Scholar
- Pask, A., Pietragalla, J., Mullan, D., and Reynolds, M. (2012). Physiological Breeding II: A Field Guide to Wheat Phenotyping. (EI Batan: CIMMYT), pp. 126–127.Google Scholar
- Reuzeau, C., Pen, J., Frankard, V., de Wolf, J., Peerbolte, R., Broekaert, W., and van Camp, W. (2010). Traitmill: a discovery engine for identifying yield-enhancement genes in cereals. PGT 1, 753–759.Google Scholar
- Sirault, X.R.R., Fripp, J., Paproki, A., Kuffner, P., Nguyen, C., Li, R., Daily, H., Guo, J., and Furbank, R. (2015). PlantscanTM: a three-dimensional phenotyping platform for capturing the structural dynamic of plant development and growth. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Functional-Structural Plant Models. (Saariselka, Finland), pp. 45–48.Google Scholar
- Wang, A. (2002). Extraction of growth parameters of winter wheat based on Terrestrial LiDAR data (in Chinese). Master Dissertation. (Nanjing: Nanjing University).Google Scholar
- Wan, J. (2006). Perspectives of molecular design breeding in crops (in Chinese). Acta Agron Sin 32, 455–462.Google Scholar
- White, J.W., Andrade-Sanchez, P., Gore, M.A., Bronson, K.F., Coffelt, T.A., Conley, M.M., Feldmann, K.A., French, A.N., Heun, J.T., Hunsaker, D.J., Jenks, M.A., Kimball, B.A., Roth, R.L., Strand, R.J., Thorp, K.R., Wall, G.W., and Wang, G. (2012). Field-based phenomics for plant genetics research. Field Crops Res 133, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wu, W., Hong, T., Wang, X., Peng, W., Li, Z, and Zhang, W. (2007). Advance in ground-based LAI measurement methods (in Chinese). J Huazhong Agri Univ 26, 270–275.Google Scholar
- Xu, X., Guo, N., Ge, Q., and Guo, X. (2006). Application of technology for computer vision in plants shape measurement (in Chinese). Comput Eng Desig 27, 1134–1136.Google Scholar
- Yang, W., Guo, Z., Huang, C., Duan, L., Chen, G., Jiang, N., Fang, W., Feng, H., Xie, W., Lian, X., Wang, G., Luo, Q., Zhang, Q., Liu, Q., and Xiong, L. (2014). Combining high-throughput phenotyping and genomewide association studies to reveal natural genetic variation in rice. Nat Commun 5, 5087.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Yu, G., and Fang, X. (2009). Concept of phenomics and its development in plant science (in Chinese). Mol Plant Breed 7, 639–645.Google Scholar
- Zhao C., Lu S., Guo X., Du J., Wen W., and Miao T. (2015). Advances in research of digital plant: 3D digitization of plant morphological structure (in Chinese). Sci Agr Sin 48, 3415–3428.Google Scholar