# Some results on the regularization of LSQR for large-scale discrete ill-posed problems

- 96 Downloads
- 2 Citations

## Abstract

LSQR, a Lanczos bidiagonalization based Krylov subspace iterative method, and its mathematically equivalent conjugate gradient for least squares problems (CGLS) applied to normal equations system, are commonly used for large-scale discrete ill-posed problems. It is well known that LSQR and CGLS have regularizing effects, where the number of iterations plays the role of the regularization parameter. However, it has long been unknown whether the regularizing effects are good enough to find best possible regularized solutions. Here a best possible regularized solution means that it is at least as accurate as the best regularized solution obtained by the truncated singular value decomposition (TSVD) method. We establish bounds for the distance between the *k*-dimensional Krylov subspace and the *k*-dimensional dominant right singular space. They show that the Krylov subspace captures the dominant right singular space better for severely and moderately ill-posed problems than for mildly ill-posed problems. Our general conclusions are that LSQR has better regularizing effects for the first two kinds of problems than for the third kind, and a hybrid LSQR with additional regularization is generally needed for mildly ill-posed problems. Exploiting the established bounds, we derive an estimate for the accuracy of the rank *k* approximation generated by Lanczos bidiagonalization. Numerical experiments illustrate that the regularizing effects of LSQR are good enough to compute best possible regularized solutions for severely and moderately ill-posed problems, stronger than our theory predicts, but they are not for mildly ill-posed problems and additional regularization is needed.

## Keywords

ill-posed problem regularization Lanczos bidiagonalization LSQR CGLS hybrid## MSC(2010)

65F22 65J20 15A18## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## Notes

### Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2011CB302400) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11371219). The authors thank the referees for their valuable suggestions and comments, which made the authors think over numerous issues deeply and improve the presentation of the paper considerably.

## References

- 1.Bauer F, Lukas M A. Comparing parameter choice for regularization of ill-posed problems. Math Comput Simul, 2011, 81: 1795–1841MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bazán F S V, Borges L S. GKB-FP: An algorithm for large-scale discrete ill-posed problems. BIT Numer Math, 2010, 50: 481–507MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bazán F S V, Cunha M C C, Borges L S. Extension of GKB-FP algorithm to large-scale general-form Tikhonov regularization. Numer Linear Algebra Appl, 2014, 21: 316–339MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 4.Bergou E H, Gratton S, Tshimanga J. The exact condition number of the truncated singular value solution of a linear ill-posed problem. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl, 2014, 35: 1073–1085MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 5.Björck Å. A bidiagonalization algorithm for solving large and sparse ill-posed systems of linear equations. BIT Numer Math, 1988, 28: 659–670MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 6.Björck Å. Numerical Methods for Least Squares Problems. Philadelphia: SIAM, 1996CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 7.Calvetti D, Golub G H, Reichel L. Estimation of the L-curve via Lanczos bidiagonalization. BIT Numer Math, 1999, 39: 603–619MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 8.Calvetti D, Hansen P C, Reichel L. L-curve curvature bounds via Lanczos bidiagonalization. Electron Trans Numer Anal, 2002, 14: 20–35MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 9.Calvetti D, Lewis B, Reichel L. On the choice of subspace for iterative methods for linear ill-posed problems. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci, 2001, 11: 1069–1092MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 10.Calvetti D, Lewis B, Reichel L. GMRES, L-curve, and discrete ill-posed problems. BIT Numer Math, 2002, 42: 44–65MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 11.Calvetti D, Morigi S, Reichel L, et al. Tikhonov regularization and the L-curve for large discrete ill-posed problems. J Comput Appl Math, 2000, 123: 423–446MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 12.Calvetti D, Reichel L. Tikhonov regularization of large linear problems. BIT Numer Math, 2003, 43: 263–283MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 13.Chung J, Nagy J G, O’Leary D P. A weighted GCV method for Lanczos hybrid regularization. Electron Trans Numer Anal, 2008, 28: 149–167MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 14.Engl H W, Hanke M, Neubauer A. Regularization of Inverse Problems. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 15.Gazzola S. Regularization techniques based on Krylov methods for ill-posed linear systems. PhD Thesis. Padua: University of Padua, 2014Google Scholar
- 16.Gazzola S, Novati P. Multi-parameter Arnoldi-Tikhonov methods. Electron Trans Numer Anal, 2013, 40: 452–475MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 17.Gazzola S, Novati P, Russo M R. On Krylov projection methods and Tikhonov regularization. Electron Trans Numer Anal, 2015, 44: 83–123MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 18.Hanke M. Conjugate Gradient Type Methods for Ill-Posed Problems. Essex: Longman, 1995MATHGoogle Scholar
- 19.Hanke M. On Lanczos based methods for the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems. BIT Numer Math, 2001, 41: 1008–1018MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Hansen P C. Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems: Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion. Philadelphia: SIAM, 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Hansen P C. Regularization tools version 4.0 for Matlab 7.3. Numer Algor, 2007, 46: 189–194MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 22.Hansen P C. Discrete Inverse Problems: Insight and Algorithms. Philadelphia: SIAM, 2010CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 23.Hnetynková I, Plešinger M, Strakoš Z. The regularizing effect of the Golub-Kahan iterative bidiagonalization and revealing the noise level in the data. BIT Numer Math, 2009, 49: 669–696MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 24.Hofmann B. Regularization for Applied Inverse and Ill-posed Problems. Stuttgart: Teubner, 1986CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 25.Jensen T K, Hansen P C. Iterative regularization with minimum-residual methods. BIT Numer Math, 2007, 47: 103–120MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 26.Jia Z, Niu D. An implicitly restarted refined bidiagonalization Lanczos method for computing a partial singular value decomposition. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl, 2003, 25: 246–265MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 27.Kilmer M E, O’Leary D P. Choosing regularization parameters in iterative methods for ill-posed problems. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl, 2001, 22: 1204–1221MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 28.Lewis B, Reichel L. Arnoldi-Tikhonov regularization methods. J Comput Appl Math, 2009, 226: 92–102MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 29.Li Z C, Huang H T, Wei Y M. Ill-conditioning of the truncated singular value decomposition, Tikhonov regularization and their applications to numerical partial differential equations. Numer Linear Algebra Appl, 2011, 18: 205–221MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 30.Neuman A, Reichel L, Sadok H. Algorithms for range restricted iterative methods for linear dicrete ill-posed problems. Numer Algor, 2012, 59: 325–331CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 31.Novati P, Russo M R. A GCV based Arnoldi-Tikhonov regularization method. BIT Numer Math, 2014, 54: 501–521MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 32.O’Leary D P, Simmons J A. A bidiagonalization-regularization procedure for large scale discretizations of ill-posed problems. SIAM J Sci Statist Comput, 1981, 2: 474–489MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 33.Paige C C, Saunders M A. LSQR: An algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares. ACM Trans Math Soft, 1982, 8: 43–71MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 34.Parlett B N. The Symmetric Eigenvalue Problem. Philedaphia: SIAM, 1998CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 35.Reichel L, Rodriguez G. Old and new parameter choice rules for discrete ill-posed problems. Numer Algor, 2013, 63: 65–87MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 36.Stewart G W. Matrix Algorithms, vol. II: Eigensystems. Philadelphia: SIAM, 2001CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 37.Vogel C R. Computational Methods for Inverse Problems. Philadelphia: SIAM, 2002CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar