Journal of Systems Science and Complexity

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 787–803 | Cite as

Variable Selection for Structural Equation with Endogeneity

Article
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

This paper studies variable selection problem in structural equation of a two-stage least squares (2SLS) model in presence of endogeneity which is commonly encountered in empirical economic studies. Model uncertainty and variable selection in the structural equation is an important issue as described in Andrews and Lu (2001) and Caner (2009). The authors propose an adaptive Lasso 2SLS estimator for linear structural equation with endogeneity and show that it enjoys the oracle properties, i.e., the consistency in both estimation and model selection. In Monte Carlo simulations, the authors demonstrate that the proposed estimator has smaller bias and MSE compared with the bridge-type GMM estimator (Caner, 2009). In a case study, the authors revisit the classic returns to education problem (Angrist and Krueger, 1991) using the China Population census data. The authors find that the education level not only has strong effects on income but also shows heterogeneity in different age cohorts.

Keywords

Endogeneity structural equation 2SLS variable selection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Heckman J J, Sample selection bias as a specification error, Econometrica, 1979, 47: 153–161.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Lin L, Cui X, and Zhu L, An adaptive two-stage estimation method for additive models, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 2009, 36: 248–269.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Angrist J D and Krueger A B, Does compulsory school attendance affect schooling and earnings?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991, 106: 979–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Darolles S, Fan Y, Florens J P, et al., Nonparametric instrumental regression, Econometrica, 2011, 79: 1541–1565.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Newey W, Efficient instrumental variables estimation of nonlinear models, Econometrica, 1990, 58: 809–837.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Fan Q and Zhong W, Nonparametric additive instrumental variable estimator: A group shrinkage estimation perspective, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2016, DOI: 10.1080/07350015.2016.1180991.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Belloni A, Chen D, Chernozhukov, et al., Sparse models and methods for optimal instruments with an application to eminent domain, Econometrica, 2012, 80: 2369–2429.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Andrews D W K and Lu B, Consistent model and moment selection procedures for GMM estimation with application to dynamic panel data models, Journal of Econometrics, 2001, 101: 123–165.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Tibshirani R, Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1996, 58: 267–288.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Fan J and Li R, Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2001, 96: 1348–1360.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Zou H, The adaptive Lasso and its oracle properties, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2006, 101: 1418–1429.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Breiman L, Better subset regression using the nonnegative garotte, Technometrics, 1996, 37: 373–384.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Caner M, Lasso-type GMM estimator, Econometric Theory, 2009, 25: 270–290.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Liao Z, Adaptive GMM shrinkage estimation with consistent moment selection, Econometric Theory, 2013, 29: 1–48.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Efron B, Hastie T, Johnston I, et al., Least angle regression, The Annals of Statistics, 2004, 32: 407–499.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Schwarz G, Estimating the dimension of a model, Annals of Statistics, 1978, 6: 461–464.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Wang H, Li R, and Tsai C, Tuning parameter selectors for the smoothly clipped absolute deviation method, Biometrika, 2007, 94: 553–568.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Caner M and Fan Q, Hybrid generalized empirical likelihood estimators: Instrument selection with adaptive lasso, Journal of Econometrics, 2015, 187: 256–274.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Knight K and Fu W, Asymptotics for Lasso type estimators, The Annals of Statistics, 2000, 28: 1356–1378.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Wang H, Li B, and Leng C, Shrinkage tuning parameter selection with a diverging number of parameters, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 2009, 71: 671–683.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Imbens G W and Rosenbaum P R, Robust, accurate confidence intervals with a weak instrument: Quarter of birth and education, Journal of Royal Statistics Society: Series A, 2005, 168: 109–126.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Buckles K S and Hungerman D M, Season of birth and later outcomes: Old questions, new answers, Review of Economics and Statistics, 2013, 95: 711–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Wu Y, Searching for the Archimedes’ lever: Is quarter-of-birth really a weak instrumental variable?, China Economic Quarterly, 2010, 2: 661–686.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Shi Q and Li W, A total-education-years (TEYs) approach in measuring human capital: Based on the 2010 population census, Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2014, 160: 95–128.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Andersen P K and Gill R D, Cox’s regression model for counting processes: A large sample study, Annals of Statistics, 1982, 10: 1100–1120.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Pollard D, Asymptotics for least absolute deviation regression estimators, Econometric Theory, 1991, 7: 186–199.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Systems Science, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics (WISE), Department of Statistics, School of Economics and Fujian Key Laboratory of Statistical ScienceXiamen UniversityXiamenChina

Personalised recommendations