Journal of Systems Science and Complexity

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 1242–1257 | Cite as

Control and optimization of sampled-data systems with quantization and actuator saturation

  • Hanyong ShaoEmail author
  • Jianrong Zhao


This paper is concerned with control and optimization for a sampled-data system with quantization and actuator saturation. Based quantization and actuator saturation a controller is introduced. The corresponding closed loop system is transformed into a system with input saturation and bounded external disturbance. A new Lyapunov functional is constructed to derive a sample-interval dependent condition on the existence of a state feedback controller such that the closed-loop system is exponentially convergent to an ultimate ellipsoid for the initial condition starting from some initial ellipsoid. Based on the condition, the desired controller is designed. Furthermore, optimization problems about the sample-interval, the ultimate ellipsoid and the initial ellipsoid are formulated. An example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.


Actuator saturation exponential converge quantization sampled-data system 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Chen T and Francis B, Optimal Sampled-Data Control Systems, Springer, Berlin, 1995.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Ghantasala S and El-Farra N, Active fault-tolerant control of sampled-data nonlinear distributed parameter systems, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 2012, 22(1): 24–42.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Van De Wouw N, Naghshtabrizi P, Cloosterman M B G, et al., Tracking control for sampleddata systems with uncertain time-varying sampling intervals and delays, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 2010, 20(4): 387–411.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Peng C and Tian Y C, Networked H control of linear systems with state quantization, Information Sciences, 2007, 177(24): 5763–5774.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Shao H Y and Han Q L, On stabilization for systems with two additive time-varying input delays arising from networked control systems, J. Franklin Inst., 2012, 349(6): 2033–2046.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Fujioka H, Stability analysis of systems with aperiodic sample-and-hold device, Automatica, 2009, 45(3): 771–775.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Shao H Y and Zhang Z Q, Delay-dependent state feedback stabilization for a networked control model with two additive input delays, Appl. Math. Comput., 2015, 265: 748–758.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Suh Y, Stability and stabilization of nonuniform sampling systems, Automatica, 2008, 44(12): 3222–3226.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Oishi Y and Fujioka H, Stability and stabilization of aperiodic sampled-data control systems: An approach using robust linear matrix inequalities, Proceedings of the 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Shanghai, China, 2009, 8142–8147.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Naghshtabrizi P, Hespanha J P, and Teel A R, Exponential stability of impulsive systems with application to uncertain sampled-data systems, Syst. Control Lett., 2008, 57(5): 378–385.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Hu L S, Lam L, Cao Y Y, et al., An LMI approach to robust H2 sampled-data control for linear uncertain systems with time-varying delay, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern., 2003, 33(1): 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Zhu X L and Wang Y Y, New stability and stabilization criteria for sampled-data systems, Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, Xiamen, China, 2010, 1829–1834.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Wen G H, Duan Z S, Yu W W, et al., Consensus of multi-agent systems with nonlinear dynamics and sampled-data information: A delayed-input approach, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 2013, 23(6): 602–619.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Fridman E, A refined input delay approach to sampled-data control, Automatica, 2010, 46(2): 421–427.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Shao H Y, New delay-dependent stability criteria for systems with interval delay, Automatica, 2009, 45(3): 744–749.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Kim J, Further improvement of Jensen inequality and application to stability of time-delay systems, Automatica, 2016, 64: 121–125.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Shao H Y, Lam J, and Feng Z G, Sampling-interval-dependent stability for linear sampled-data systems with nonuniform sampling, Int. J. Syst. Sci., 2016, 47(12): 2893–2900.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Zuo Z Q, Ho D W C, and Wang Y J, Fault tolerant control for singular systems with actuator saturation and nonlinear perturbation, Automatica, 2010, 46(2): 569–576.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Xu S Y, Feng G, Zou Y, et al., Robust controller design of uncertain discrete time-delay systems with input saturation and disturbances, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 2012, 57(10): 2604–2609.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Seuret A and Da Silva J M G, Taking into account period variations and actuators saturation in sampled-data systems, Syst. Control Lett., 2012, 61(12): 1286–1293.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Kalman R, Nonlinear aspects of sampled-data control systems, Proceedings of the Symposium on Nonlinear Circuit Theory, Brooklyn, New York, 1956.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Rasool F, Huang D, and Nguang S, Robust H output feedback control of discrete-time networked systems with limited information, Syst. Control Lett., 2011, 60(10): 845–853.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Liu A D, Yu L, Zhang W A, et al., Moving horizon estimation for networked systems with quantized measurements and packet dropouts, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Regul. Pap., 2013, 60(7): 1823–1834.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Zhang D, Yu L, and Zhang W A, Energy efficient distributed filtering for a class of nonlinear systems in sensor networks, IEEE Sens. J., 2015, 15(5): 3026–3036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Fridman E and Dambrine M, Control under quantization, saturation and delay: An LMI approach, Automatica, 2009, 45(10): 2258–2264.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Gao H J and Chen T, H estimation for uncertain systems with limited communication capacity, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 2007, 52(11): 2070–2084.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Ishido Y, Takaba K, and Quevedo D E, Stability analysis of networked control systems subjected to packet-dropouts and finite-level quantization, Syst. Control Lett., 2011, 60(5): 325–332.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Shao H Y, Han Q L, Zhang Z Q, et al., Sampling-interval-dependent stability for sampled-data systems with state quantization, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 2014, 24(17): 2995–3008.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Systems Science, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of AutomationQufu Normal UniversityQufuChina

Personalised recommendations