Abstract
When the allocated fixed cost is treated as the complement of other costs, conventional data envelopment analysis (DEA) researches have ignored the effect of the return to scale (RTS) in fixed cost allocation problems. This paper first demonstrates why the RTS should be considered in fixed cost allocation problems. Then treating the fixed cost as a complementary input, the authors investigate the relationship between the allocated cost and the variable return to scale (VRS) efficiency based on the super BCC DEA model. However, the infeasibility problem may exist in this situation. To deal with it, the authors propose an algorithm. The authors find that the super BCC efficiency is a monotone non-increasing function of the allocated cost. Based on the relationship, the authors finally propose a fixed cost allocation approach in terms of principles as: (i) The fixed cost proportion allocated to inelastic DMUs should be consistent with their consumed cost proportion, and (ii) the same efficiency satisfaction degree to the rest DMUs. The optimal allocation scheme is unique. A numerical example and a real example of allocating fixed costs among 13 subsidiaries are employed to illustrate the proposed approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Charnes A, Cooper W W, and Rhodes E, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429–444.
Banker R D, Charnes A, and Cooper W W, Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 1984, 30(8): 1078–1092.
Wu J and Liang L, A DEA model for identifying critical input-output performance measures, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2012, 25(2): 275–286.
Wei Q and Yan H, The data envelopment analysis model with intersection form production possibility set, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2010, 23(6): 1086–1101.
Cooper W W, Sieford L M, and Tone K, Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA Solver Software, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2007.
Cook WD and Kress M, Characterizing an equitable allocation of shared costs: A DEA approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 119: 119–652.
Cook W D and Zhu J, Allocation of shared costs among decision making units: A DEA approach, Computers & Operations Research, 2005, 32: 32–2171.
Jahanshahloo G R, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, and Moradi M, A DEA approach for fair allocation of common revenue, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2005, 160: 160–719.
Jahanshahloo G R, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Shoja N, and Sanei M, An alternative approach for equitable allocation of shared costs by using DEA, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2004, 153: 153–267.
Lin R, Allocating fixed costs and common revenue via data envelopment analysis, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2011, 218: 218–3680.
Lin R, Allocating fixed costs or resources and setting targets via data envelopment analysis, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2011, 217: 217–6349.
Amirteimoori A and Shafiei M, Characterizing an equitable omission of shared resources: A DEA-based approach, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2006, 177: 177–18.
Amirteimoori A and Kordrostami S, Allocating fixed costs and target setting: A DEA-based approach, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2005, 171: 171–136.
Beasley J E, Allocating fixed costs and resources via data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 147: 147–198.
Yan H, Wei Q, and Hao G, DEA models for resource reallocation and production input/output estimation, European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 136: 136–19.
Avellar J V G, Milioni A Z, and Rabello T N, Spherical frontier DEA model based on a constant sum of inputs, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2007, 58: 58–1246.
Guedes E C C, Milioni A Z, de Avellar J V G, and Silva R C, Adjusted spherical frontier model: Allocating input via parametric DEA, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2012, 63: 63–406.
Milioni A Z, Avellar J V G, Gomes E G, and Mello J C C B S, An ellipsoidal frontier model: Allocating input via parametric DEA, European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 209: 209–113.
Lozano S and Villa G, Centralized resource allocation using data envelopment analysis, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2004, 22: 22–143.
Li Y J, Yang M, Chen Y, Dai Q Z, and Liang L, Allocating a fixed cost based on data envelopment analysis and satisfaction degree, OMEGA-International Journal of Management Science, 2013, 41: 41–55.
Si X, Liang L, Jia J, Yang L, Wu H, and Li Y, Proportional sharing and DEA in allocating the fixed cost, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2013, 219: 219–6580.
Du J, Cook W D, Liang L, and Zhu J, Fixed cost and resource allocation based on DEA crossefficiency, European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 235: 235–206.
Golany B and Tamir E, Evaluating efficiency-effectiveness-equality trade-offs: A data envelopment approach, Management Science, 1995, 41: 41–1172.
Li X and Cui J, A comprehensive DEA approach for the resource allocation problem based on scale economies classification, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2008, 21(4): 540–557.
Li Y, Yang F, Liang L, and Hua Z, Allocating the fixed cost as a complement of other cost inputs: A DEA approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 197: 197–389.
Bi G, Ding J, Luo Y, and Liang L, Resource allocation and target setting for parallel production system based on DEA, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011, 35: 35–4270.
Khodabakhshi M and Aryavash K, The fair allocation of common fixed cost or revenue using DEA concept, Annals of Operations Research, 2014, 214: 214–187.
Lozano S, Villa G, and Canca D, Application of centralised DEA approach to capital budgeting in Spanish ports, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2011, 60: 60–455.
Pachkova E V, Restricted reallocation of resources, European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 196: 196–1049.
Amirteimoori A and Tabar M M, Resource allocation and target setting in data envelopment analysis, Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37: 37–3036.
Korhonen P and Syrjänen M, Resource allocation based on efficiency analysis, Management Science, 2004, 50: 50–1134.
Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Hatami-Marbini A, Agrell P J, Aghayi N, and Gholami K, Allocating fixed resources and setting targets using a common-weights DEA approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2013, 64: 64–631.
Cinca C S and Molinero C M, Selecting DEA specifications and ranking units via PCA, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2004, 55: 55–521.
Jenkins L and Anderson M, A multivariate statistical approach to reducing the number of variables in data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operation Research, 2003, 147: 147–51.
Cook W D, Liang L, Zha Y, and Zhu J, A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2009, 60: 60–276.
Dyson R G, Allen R, Camanho A S, Podinovski V V, and Sarrico C S, Pitfalls and protocols in DEA, European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 132: 132–245.
Adler N, Friedman L, and Sinuany-Stern Z, Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context, European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 140: 140–249.
Bal H, Örkcü H H, and Celebioglu S, A new method based on the dispersion of weights in data envelopment analysis, Journal of Computers Industrial Engineering, 2008, 54: 54–502.
Wang Y M and Luo Y, A note on a new method based on the dispersion of weights in data envelopment analysis, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2009, 56: 56–1703.
Jahanshahloo G R and Shahmirzadi P F, New methods for ranking decision making units based on the dispersion of weights and Norm 1 in Data Envelopment Analysis, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2013, 65: 65–187.
Majid Z A L, Adli M, and Ali E, Ranking efficient decision-making units in data envelopment analysis using fuzzy concept, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2010, 59: 59–712.
Andersen P and Petersen N C, A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 1993, 39: 39–1261.
Chen Y, Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility, European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 161: 161–545.
Lee H S, Chu C W, and Zhu J, Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility, European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 212: 212–141.
Chen Y and Liang L, Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility: One model approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 213: 213–359.
Lee H S and Zhu J, Super-efficiency infeasibility and zero data in DEA, European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 216: 216–429.
Xie Q, Dai Q, Mita S, Long Q, and Li Y, Investigate the relationship between the super-efficiency and fixed input in the presence of infeasibility, Proceedings of the 16th International IEEE Annual Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013), Hague, 2013, 2026–2032.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research is supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant Nos. 2015M571135, 2015M570155, and 2015M571134, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 71271196, 71201156, 71403055, and 21307150, and Science Funds for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and University of Science and Technology of China under Grant Nos. 71121061 and WK2040160008.
This paper was recommended for publication by Editor ZHANG Xun.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dai, Q., Li, Y. & Liang, L. Allocating fixed costs with considering the return to scale: A DEA approach. J Syst Sci Complex 29, 1320–1341 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-015-4211-0
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-015-4211-0