Skip to main content
Log in

Is technical analysis informative in UK stock market? Evidence from decomposition-based vector autoregressive (DVAR) model

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper proposes a new approach — The decomposition-based vector autoregressive (DVAR) model to scrutinize the predictability of the UK stock market. Empirical studies performed on the monthly British FTSE100 index over 1984–2012 confirm that the DVAR model does provide informative forecasts for both in-sample and out-of-sample forecasts. Trading strategies based on the DVAR forecasts can significantly beat the simple buy-and-hold, which demonstrates the valuable information provided by technical analysis in the UK stock market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fama E F, Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work, Journal of Finance, 1970 25: 383–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cochrane J H, New facts in finance, Economic Perspectives, 1999, 23: 36–58.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rozeff M, Dividend yields are equity risk premiums, Journal of Portfolio Management, 1984, 11: 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell J Y and Shiller R J, The dividend-price ratio and expectations of future dividends and discount factors, Review of Financial Studies, 1988, 1: 195–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fama E F and French K R, Dividend yields and expected stock returns, Journal of Financial Economics, 1988, 22: 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hodrick R J, Dividend yields and expected stock returns: Alternative procedures for inference and measurement, Review of Financial Studies, 1992, 5: 257–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lewellen J, Predicting returns with financial ratios, Journal of Financial Economics, 2004, 74: 209–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell J Y and Shiller R J, Stock prices, earnings, and expected dividends, Journal of Finance, 1988b, 43: 661–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell J Y and Shiller R J, Valuation ratios and the long-run stock market outlook, Journal of Portfolio Management, 1998, 24: 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lamont O, Earnings and expected returns, Journal of Finance, 1998, 53: 1563–1587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kothari S P and Shanken J, Book-to-market, dividend yield, and expected market returns: A time series analysis, Journal of Financial Economics, 1997, 44: 169–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pontiff J and Schall L D, Book-to-market ratios as predictors of market returns, Journal of Financial Economics, 1998, 49: 141–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ang A and Bekaert G, Stock return predictability: Is it there?, Review of Financial Studies, 2007, 20: 651–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keim D B and Stambaugh R F, Predicting returns in the stock and bond markets, Journal of Financial Economics, 1986, 17: 357–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Campbell J Y, Stock returns and the term structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 1987, 18: 373–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fama E F and French K R, Business conditions and expected returns on stocks and bonds, Journal of Financial Economics, 1989, 25: 23–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lettau M and Ludvigson S, Consumption, aggregate wealth, and expected stock returns, Journal of Finance, 2001, 56: 815–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rey D, Stock market predictability: Is it there? A critical review, 2004, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.137.7294.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Clare A D, Thomas S H, and Wickens M R, Is the gilt-equity yield ratio useful for predicting UK stock return?, Economic Journal, 1994, 104: 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Black A and Fraser P, UK stock return: Predictability and business conditions, The Manchester School Supplement, 1995, 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pesaran M H and Timmermann A, A recursive modeling approach to predicting UK stock returns, Economic Journal, 2000, 110: 159–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McMillan D G, Nonlinear predictability of short-run deviations in UK stock market returns, Economic Letters, 2004, 84: 149–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xie H B and Wang S Y, A new approach to modeling financial markets, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2013, 26(3) 432–440.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Parkinson M, The extreme value method for estimating the variance of the rate of return, Journal of Business, 1980, 53: 61–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nison S, Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques, New York Institute of Finance, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Morris G, Candlestick Charting Explained, New York, McGrawHill, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Campbell J Y and Thompson S B, Predicting excess stock returns out-of-sample: Can anything beat the historical average? Review of Financial Studies, 2008, 21(4) 169–203.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Welch I and Goyal A, A comprehensive look at the empirical performance of equity premium prediction, Review of Financial Studies, 2008, 21(4) 169–203.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research is supported by Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China under Grant No. 12YJC790001, National Social Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 12CJY117, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 71003057 and 71373262, and the Program for Innovative Research Team and “211” Program in UIBE.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor WANG Shouyang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xie, H., Bian, J., Wang, M. et al. Is technical analysis informative in UK stock market? Evidence from decomposition-based vector autoregressive (DVAR) model. J Syst Sci Complex 27, 144–156 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-014-3280-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-014-3280-9

Key words

Navigation