Advertisement

Journal of Systems Science and Complexity

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 476–493 | Cite as

White noise estimation for discrete-time systems with random delay and packet dropout

  • Wei WangEmail author
  • Chunyan Han
  • Fang He
Article

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the optimal and suboptimal deconvolution problems for discrete-time systems with random delayed observations. When the random delay is known online, i.e., time stamped, the random delayed system is reconstructed as an equivalent delay-free one by using measurement reorganization technique, and then an optimal input white noise estimator is presented based on the stochastic Kalman filtering theory. However, the optimal white-noise estimator is timevarying, stochastic, and doesn’t converge to a steady state in general. Then an alternative suboptimal input white-noise estimator with deterministic gains is developed under a new criteria. The estimator gain and its respective error covariance-matrix information are derived based on a new suboptimal state estimator. It can be shown that the suboptimal input white-noise estimator converges to a steady-state one under appropriate assumptions.

Keywords

Discrete-time system packet dropout random delay white-noise estimators 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Mendel J M, White-noise estimators for seismic date processing in oil exploration, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 1977, 22: 694–706.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Sun S, Multi-sensor information fusion white noise filter weighted by scalars based Kalman predictor, Automatica, 2004, 40: 1447–1453.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Mendel J M, Minimum variance deconvolution, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 1981, 19: 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Sun X and Yan G, Self-tuning weighted measurement fusion white noise deconvolution estimator and its convergence analysis, Digital Signal Processing, 2013, 23: 38–48.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Deng Z, Zhang H, Liu S, and Zhou L, Optimal and self-tuning white noise estimators with application to deconvolution and filtering problem, Automatica, 1996, 32(2): 199–216.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Chisci L and Mosca E, Polynomial equations for the linear MMSE state estimation, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 1992, 37(5): 623–626.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Zhang B, Lam J, and Xu S, Deconvolution filtering for stochastic systems via homogeneous polynomial Lyapunov functions, Signal Processing, 2009, 89: 605–614.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Shi L, Xie L, and Murrayc R, Kalman filtering over a packet-delaying network: A probabilistic approach, Automatica, 2009, 44: 2134–2140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Wang Z, Ho D W C, and Liu X, Robust filtering under randomly varying sensor delay measurements, IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems-II: Express Briefs, 2004, 51: 320–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Shen B, Wang Z, Shu H, and Wei G, H filtering for nonlinear discrete-time stochastic systems with randomly varying sensor delays, Automatica, 2009, 45(4): 1032–1037.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Song H, Yu L, and Zhang W, H filtering of network-based systems with random delay, Signal Processing, 2009, 89(4): 615–622.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Zhang H, Feng G, and Han C, Linear estimation for random delay systems, Systems and Control Letters, 2011, 60: 450–459.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Ma J and Sun S, Optimal linear estimators for systems with random sensor delays, multiple packet dropouts, and uncertain observations, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, 2011, 59(11): 5181–5192.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Dong H, Wang Z, and Gao H, Robust H filtering for a class of nonlinear networked systems with multiple stochastic communication delays and packet dropouts, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, 2010, 58(4): 1957–1966.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Sinopoli B, Schenato L, Franceschetti M, Poolla K, Jordan M I, and Sastry S S, Kalman filtering with intermittent observations, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 2004, 49(9): 1453–1463.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    You K, Fu M, and Xie L, Mean square stability for Kalman filtering with Markovian packet losses, Automatica, 2011, 47: 2647–2657.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Yu C, Xiao N, Zhang C, and Xie L, An optimal deconvolution smoother for systems with random parametric uncertainty and its application to semi-blind deconvolution, Signal Processing, 2012, 92: 2497–2508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Ma J, Liu L, and Sun S, White noise filters for systems with multiple packet dropouts, Proceedings of the 30th Chinese Control Conference, Yantai, China, July 2011, 1586–1590.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Sun X and Deng Z, Information fusion steady-state white noise deconvolution estimators with time-delayed measurements, Proceedings of the 27th Chinene Control Conference, Kunming, China, July 2008, 601–605.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Lu X, Zhang H, and Yan J, On the H deconvolution fixed-lag smoothing, International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, 2010, 8(4): 896–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Systems Science, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Control Science and EngineeringShandong UniversityJinanChina
  2. 2.School of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of JinanJinanChina

Personalised recommendations