Skip to main content
Log in

Error reduction, convergence and optimality of an adaptive mixed finite element method

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proves the error reduction property (saturation property), convergence and optimality of an adaptive mixed finite element method (AMFEM) for the Poisson equation. In each step of AMFEM, the local refinement is performed basing on simple either edge-oriented residuals or edge-oriented data oscillations, depending only on the marking strategy, under some restriction of refinement. The main tools used here are the strict discrete local efficiency property given by Carstensen and Hoppe (2006) and the quasi-orthogonality estimate proved by Chen, Holst, and Xu (2009). Numerical experiments fully confirm the theoretical analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Anisworth and J. T. Oden, A Posteriori Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis, Wiley, Chichester, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. I. Babuska and W. Rheinboldt, A posteriori error estimates for the finite element method, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 1978, 12: 1597–1615.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. I. Babuska and W. Rheinboldt, Error estimates for adaptive finite element computations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 1978, 15: 736–754.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. I. Babuska and T. Strouboulis, The Finite Element Method and Its Reliability, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. Bangerth and R. Rannacher, Adaptive finite element methods for differential equations, Lectures in Mathematics, ETH-Zürich. Birkhäuser, Basel, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Carstensen and J. Hu, A unifying theory of a posteriori error control for nonconforming finite element methods, Numer. Math., 2007, 107: 473–502.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. S. H. Du and X. P. Xie, Residual-based a posteriori error estimates of nonconforming finite element method for elliptic problem with Dirac delta source terms. Science in China Series A: Mathematics, 2008, 51(8): 1440–1460.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Eriksson, D. Estep, P. Hansbo, and C. Johnson, Computational Differetial Equations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Verfürth, A Review of a Posteriori Error Estimation and Adaptive Mesh-Refinement Techniques, Wiley-Teubner, 1996.

  10. J. M. Cascon, C. Kreuzer, R. H. Nochetto, and K. G. Siebert, Quasi-optimal convergence rate for an adaptive finite element method, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 2008, 46(5): 2524–2550.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Morin, R. H. Nochetto, and K. G. Siebert, Data oscillation and convergence of adaptive FEM, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 2000, 38(2): 466–488.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Morin, R. H. Nochetto, and K. G. Siebert, Local problems on stars: A posteriori error estimators, convergence, and performance, Math. Comp., 2003, 72(243): 1067–1097.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Morin, R. H. Nochetto, and K. G. Siebert, Convergence of adaptive finite element methods, SIAM Review, 2002, 44(4): 631–658.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Carstensen and R. H. W. Hoppe, Error reduction and convergence for an adaptive mixed finite element method, Math. Comp., 2006, 75: 1033–1042.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. L. Chen, M. Holst, and J. C. Xu, Convergence and optimality of adaptive mixed finite element methods, Math. Comp., 2009, 78(265): 35–53.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Braess, Finite Elements, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Brenner and L. R. Scott, The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods, Springer, New York, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. F. Brezzi and M. Fortin, Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods, Springer, New York, 1991.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Alonso, Error estimators for a mixed method, Numer. Math., 1996, 74(4): 385–395.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. C. Carstensen, A posteriori error estimate for the mixed finite method, Math. Comp., 1997, 66(218): 465–476.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. B. Wohlmuth and R. H. W. Hoppe, A comparison of a posteriori error estimators for mixed finite element discretizations, Math. Comp., 1999, 82: 253–279.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. P. Binev, W. Dahmen, and R. DeVore, Adaptive finite element methods with convergence rates, Numer. Math., 2004, 97(2): 219–268.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. R. Stevenson, Optimality of a standard adaptive finite element method, Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 2007, 2: 245–269.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Mao, An optimally convergent adaptive mixed finite element method, Numer. Math., 2008, 111: 35–54.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. R. Stevenson, The completion of locally refined simplicial partitions created by section, Math. Comp., 2008, 77: 227–241.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaohong Du.

Additional information

This work was supported in part by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 10771150, the National Basic Research Program of China under Grant No. 2005CB321701, and the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing City under Grant No. CSTC, 2010BB8270.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor Ningning YAN.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Du, S., Xie, X. Error reduction, convergence and optimality of an adaptive mixed finite element method. J Syst Sci Complex 25, 195–208 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-012-9242-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-012-9242-1

Key words

Navigation