Skip to main content
Log in

R & D Strategic Investment in an Asymmetrical Case

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyzes R & D investment decisions in an asymmetrical case. The investment decisions share three important characteristics. First, the investment is completely irreversible. Second, there are two kinds of uncertainties over the future returns from the investment and over technology in R & D process, respectively. Third, there is strategic competition in the asymmetrical case. This article presents the optimal investment threshold values and the optimal investment rule of high-efficient firm (leader), and shows that the investment threshold values are reduced by competition of two firms. Finally, the mixed investment strategies for two firms, the probability that each firm separately exercises the option to invest, and the probability that two firms simultaneously exercise the option are given in the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dixit and R. S. Pindyck, Investment Under Uncertainty, Princeton University Press, 1994.

  2. L. Trgeorgis, Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, London England, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. R. Grenadier, Option exercise games: an application to the equilibrium investment strategies of firms, Review of Economic Studies, 2002, 15: 691–721.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Fudenberg and J. Tirole, Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology, Review of Economic Studies, 1985, 52: 383–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Helen Weeds, Strategic delay in a real option model of R & D competition, Review of Economic Studies, 2002, 56: 729–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P. K. Dutta and A. Rustichini, Theory of stopping time game with applications to product innovations and asset sales, Economic Theory, 1993, 3: 743–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Mcdonald and D. Siegel, The value of waiting to invest, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1986, 101: 707–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Robert Gibbons, Game Theory for Applied Economists, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1992, 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weiying Zhang, Game Theory and the Economics of Information, Publishing House of Shan Lian Bookshop, 1996. (in Chinese)

  10. Richard Watt, An Introduction to the Economics of Information, Oxford University Press, 1995.

  11. D. C. Joaquin and K. C. Butler, Competitive investment decisions: A synthesis in Brennan, M. J. and L. Trigeorgis, Eds., Project Flexibility, Agency, and Competition New Developments in the Theory and Applications of Real Options, Oxford University Press, 2000, 324–339.

  12. K. J. M. Huisman, Technology Investment: A Game Theoretic Real Options Approach, Kluwer Academic Pub., Boston (MA, USA), 2001, 259–265.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minggao Xue.

Additional information

This work is supported by Post Doctor Science Foundation of China (2003034479) and Natural Science Foundation of China (70671047).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xue, M., Gong, P. R & D Strategic Investment in an Asymmetrical Case. Jrl Syst Sci & Complex 19, 547–557 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-006-0547-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-006-0547-9

Key Word

Navigation