Advertisement

A review of empirical studies of affordances and development of a framework for educational adoption of mobile social media

  • Sijia XueEmail author
  • Daniel Churchill
Development Article

Abstract

As one of the most widely adopted mobile and social media applications, Tencent WeChat ® (‘WeChat’) has been increasingly used in education at all levels in Asia, and in China in particular. However, only a small number of studies have been conducted to explore educational affordances of WeChat. In this paper, these affordances are defined as opportunities for an educational activity that are determined and supported by perceived and actual features of a technology tool or an environment (Gibson in The ecological approach to visual perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1979; Norman in The psychology of everyday things, Basic Books, New York, 1988; Sanders in Ecol Psychol 9(1):97–112, 1997). The authors conducted a review of 21 studies out of a pool of 1984 identified publications on the topic to examine existing practices, empirical studies and recommendations for the uses of WeChat, and with the over-reaching aim of articulating a framework for the adoption of educational affordances of mobile social media. Such framework will serve practice as well as research on educational uses of mobile social media and help extend theory of affordances in this domain. A total of seven categories of educational affordances of WeChat were explicated and included in this framework: Resources Sharing, Authentic Learning, Collaboration, Community Building, Motivating Environment, Evaluation and Feedback, and Administration for Learning. Guidelines for the adoption of this framework are developed, and suggestions for future research are proposed.

Keywords

Mobile social media Affordances WeChat Mobile learning Technology in education 

Notes

Funding

This study has not received funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aydin, S. (2012). A review of research on facebook as an educational environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(6), 1093–1106.Google Scholar
  2. Bahner, D., Adkins, E., Patel, N., Donley, C., Nagel, R., & Kman, N. (2012). How we use social media to supplement a novel curriculum in medical education. Medical Teacher, 34(6), 439–444.Google Scholar
  3. Beheshti-Kashi, S., & Makki, B. (2015). Social media development, usage, challenges, and opportunities. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (3rd ed.). London: Against the Grain.Google Scholar
  4. Bergman, E. M. L. (2012). Finding citations to social work literature: The relative benefits of using “Web of Science,” “Scopus,” or “Google Scholar”. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(6), 370–379.Google Scholar
  5. Blattner, G., Fiori, M., & College, D. (2011). Virtual social network communities: An investigation of language learners’ development of sociopragmatic awareness and multiliteracy skills. CALICO Journal, 29(1), 24–43.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, S. A. (2012). Seeing web 2.0 in context: A study of academic perceptions. Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 50–57.Google Scholar
  7. Burston, J. (2016). The future of foreign language instructional technology: BYOD MALL. The EuroCALL Review, 24(1), 3.Google Scholar
  8. Burston, J. (2017). MALL: Global prospects and local implementation. CALL-EJ, 18(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  9. Callaghan, G., & Fribbance, I. (2016). The use of Facebook to build a community for distance learning students: A case study from the Open University. Open Learning, 31(3), 260–272.Google Scholar
  10. Chaffey, D. (2016). Statistics on consumer mobile usage and adoption to inform your mobile marketing strategy mobile site design and app development. http://www.smartinsights.com/mobile-marketing/mobile-marketing-analytics/mobile-marketing-statistics.
  11. Chawinga, W. D. (2016). Teaching and learning 24/7 using Twitter in a University Classroom: Experiences from a developing country. E-Learning and Digital Media, 13(1–2), 45–61.Google Scholar
  12. Chawinga, W. D. (2017). Taking social media to a university classroom: Teaching and learning using Twitter and blogs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  13. Chen, E., & Liu, J. (2012). Applying multimedia technology to the teaching and learning of College English in China: Problems and solutions. Journal of Information Technology and Application in Education, 1(3), 108–111.Google Scholar
  14. Cho, J., & Lee, E. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report, 19(32), 1–20.Google Scholar
  15. Churchill, D. (2007). Web 2.0 and possibilities for educational applications. Educational Technology, 47(2), 24–29.Google Scholar
  16. Churchill, D. (2011). Web 2.0 in education: A study of the explorative use of blogs with a postgraduate class. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(2), 149–158.Google Scholar
  17. Churchill, D., Fox, B., & King, M. (2016). Framework for designing mobile learning environments. In D. Churchill, J. Lu, T. K. F. Chiu, & B. Fox (Eds.), Mobile learning design: Theories and application (pp. 3–25). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Churchill, D., King, M., & Fox, B. (2013). Learning design for science education in the 21st century. Journal of the Institute for Educational Research, 45(2), 404–421.Google Scholar
  19. Churchill, D., Lu, J., & Chiu, T. (2014). Integrating mobile technologies, social media and learning design. Educational Media International, 51(3), 163–165.Google Scholar
  20. Churchill, D., & Wang, T. (2014). Teacher’s use of iPads in higher education. Educational Media International, 51(3), 214–225.Google Scholar
  21. Crompton, H. (2015). Understanding angle and angle measure: A design-based research study using context aware ubiquitous learning. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 22(1), 19–30.Google Scholar
  22. Ding, X. W. (2016). The effect of WeChat-assisted problem-based learning on the critical thinking disposition of EFL learners. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(12), 23–29.Google Scholar
  23. Diug, B., Kendal, E., & Ilic, D. (2016). Evaluating the use of twitter as a tool to increase engagement in medical education. Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice, 29(3), 223–230.Google Scholar
  24. Eaton, S. E. (2010). Formal, non-formal and informal learning: The case of literacy, essential skills and language learning in Canada. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED508254.
  25. Gao, C., & Wang, J. (2017). Mobile teaching of digital mapping based on the WeChat official account admin platform. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(7), 56–67.Google Scholar
  26. Gaver, W.W. (1991). Technology affordances. In CHI’91 conference proceedings (pp. 79–84).Google Scholar
  27. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  28. Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26.Google Scholar
  29. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  30. Goodband, J., Solomon, Y., Samuels, P., Lawson, D., & Bhakta, R. (2012). Limits and potentials of social networking in academia: Case study of the evolution of a mathematics Facebook community. Learning Media and Technology, 37(3), 236–252.Google Scholar
  31. Hao, S., Dennen, V. P., & Mei, L. (2017). Influential factors for mobile learning acceptance among Chinese users. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 101–123.Google Scholar
  32. Jin, L. (2018). Digital affordances on WeChat: Learning Chinese as a second language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1–2), 27–52.Google Scholar
  33. Joubert, M., & Wishart, J. (2012). Participatory practices: Lessons learnt from two initiatives using online digital technologies to build knowledge. Computers & Education, 59(1), 110–119.Google Scholar
  34. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68.Google Scholar
  35. Kassens, A. L. (2014). Tweeting your way to improved #writing, #reflection, and #community. Journal of Economic Education, 45(2), 101–109.Google Scholar
  36. Ke, F. (2009). A qualitative meta-analysis of computer games as learning tools. In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (pp. 1–32). Hershey: Information Science Reference.Google Scholar
  37. Kucirkova, N. (2017). iRPD—A framework for guiding design-based research for iPad apps. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 598–610.Google Scholar
  38. Li, Z., Fan, Y., & Jiao, J. (2016). Integrate WeChat with Moodle to provide a mobile learning environment for students. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED571564.
  39. Liaw, S., Hatala, M., & Huang, H. (2010). Investigating acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: Based on activity theory approach. Computers & Education, 54(2), 446–454.Google Scholar
  40. Liu, Z. (2014). A study on the application of WeChat in ESP training. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(12), 2549–2554.Google Scholar
  41. Luo, H., & Yang, C. (2016). Using WeChat in teaching L2 Chinese: An exploratory study. Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, 7(2), 82–96.Google Scholar
  42. Ma, J., & Wu, Z. (2017). Study on team-based learning based on Wechat public platform: The case of design and implementation of mass media management course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(11), 7307–7312.Google Scholar
  43. Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Is Facebook still a suitable technology-enhanced learning environment? An updated critical review of the literature from 2012 to 2015. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 503–528.Google Scholar
  44. Menkhoff, T., Chay, Y. W., Bengtsson, M. L., Woodard, C. J., & Gan, B. (2015). Incorporating microblogging (“tweeting”) in higher education: Lessons learnt in a knowledge management course. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1295–1302.Google Scholar
  45. Menzies, R., Petrie, K., & Zarb, M. (2017). A case study of Facebook use: Outlining a multi-layer strategy for higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 22(1), 39–53.Google Scholar
  46. Nicolai, L., Schmidbauer, M., Gradel, M., Ferch, S., Antón, S., Hoppe, B., et al. (2017). Facebook groups as a powerful and dynamic tool in medical education: Mixed-method study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(12), E408.Google Scholar
  47. Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  48. Özdemir, Emrah. (2017). Promoting EFL learners’ intercultural communication effectiveness: A focus on Facebook. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 510–528.Google Scholar
  49. Price, D., Lemoine, C., South, N., & Hossain, R. (2018). First year nursing students use of social media within education: Results of a survey. Nurse Education Today, 61, 70–76.Google Scholar
  50. Qi, G. Y., & Wang, Y. (2018). Investigating the building of a WeChat-based community of practice for language teachers’ professional development. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 72–88.Google Scholar
  51. Ricoy, María-Carmen, & Feliz, T. (2016). Twitter as a learning community in higher education. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 237–248.Google Scholar
  52. Robbins, S., & Singer, J. (2014). From the Editor—The medium is the message: Integrating social media and social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 50(3), 387–390.Google Scholar
  53. Sanders, J. (1997). An ontology of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 9(1), 97–112.Google Scholar
  54. Selwyn, N., & Stirling, E. (2016). Social media and education… now the dust has settled. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  55. Shang, W. (2016). Construction and application of WeChat learning platform in “Folk literature” teaching. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(5), 10–15.Google Scholar
  56. Sharma, S. K., Joshi, A., & Sharma, H. (2016). A multi-analytical approach to predict the Facebook usage in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 340–353.Google Scholar
  57. Sharples, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers & Education, 34(3), 177–193.Google Scholar
  58. Shen, L. (2016). The construction and application of the WeChat-based translation teaching model. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(9), 76–80.Google Scholar
  59. Shi, Z., & Luo, G. (2016). Application of WeChat teaching platform in interactive translation teaching. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(9), 71–75.Google Scholar
  60. Shi, Z., Luo, G., & He, L. (2017). Mobile-assisted language learning using WeChat instant messaging. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(2), 16–26.Google Scholar
  61. Statista. (2016). Monthly active users of selected social networks and messaging services. https://www.statista.com/chart/5194/active-users-of-social-networks-and-messaging-services.
  62. Stewart, O. G. (2015). A critical review of the literature of social media’s affordances in the classroom. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(5–6), 481–501.Google Scholar
  63. Sun, Y., & Yang, F. (2015). I Help, therefore, I learn: Service learning on web 2.0 in an EFL speaking class. Computer Assisted Language Learning: An International Journal, 28(3), 202–219.Google Scholar
  64. Sung, K., & Poole, F. (2017). Investigating the use of a smartphone social networking application on language learning. The JALT CALL Journal, 30(2), 97–115.Google Scholar
  65. Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2017a). Using Twitter for education: Beneficial or simply a waste of time? Computers & Education, 106(C), 97–118.Google Scholar
  66. Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2017b). Is mobile instant messaging (MIM) useful in education? Examining its technological, pedagogical, and social affordances. Educational Research Review, 21, 85–104.Google Scholar
  67. Tao, Y., Luo, L., & Zhang, H. (2017). A study on English reading teaching assisted by WeChat public platform. In The sixth international conference of educational innovation through technology (pp. 246–249). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8308552/metrics.
  68. Tess, P. A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)—A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A60–A68.Google Scholar
  69. Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.Google Scholar
  70. Wang, X. (2017a). Spatial and literacy practices of chinese international students across a bridge writing classroom and WeChat. Language and Education, 31(6), 561–579.Google Scholar
  71. Wang, X. (2017b). Transnational Chinese students’ literacy and networking practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(6), 687–696.Google Scholar
  72. Wang, Y., Fang, W., Han, J., & Chen, N. (2016). Exploring the affordances of WeChat for facilitating teaching, social and cognitive presence in semi-synchronous language exchange. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 18–37.Google Scholar
  73. Wang, J., Gao, F., Li, J., Zhang, J., Li, S., Xu, G., et al. (2017). The usability of WeChat as a mobile and interactive medium in student-centered medical teaching. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 45(5), 421–425.Google Scholar
  74. Wang, X., Li, M., Wang, M., Cui, S., Shi, L., Duan, L., et al. (2018). The use of mobile messaging-based case studies in a pharmacotherapy introduction class in China. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 526–533.Google Scholar
  75. WeChat. (2011). WeChat (version 6.7.3) [mobile application software]. https://www.wechat.com/zh_TW.
  76. Wu, W., Wu, Y., Chen, C., Kao, H., Lin, C., & Huang, S. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 817–827.Google Scholar
  77. Xu, Q., Dong, X., & Jiang, L. (2017). EFL learners’ perceptions of mobile-assisted feedback on oral production. TESOL Quarterly, 51(2), 408–417.Google Scholar
  78. Xu, Q., & Peng, H. (2017). Investigating mobile-assisted oral feedback in teaching Chinese as a second language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 173–182.Google Scholar
  79. Zeng, F., Deng, G., Wang, Z., & Liu, L. (2016). WeChat: A new clinical teaching tool for problem-based learning. International Journal of Medical Education, 7, 119–121.Google Scholar
  80. Zheng, Y., & Yu, A. (2016). Affordances of social media in collective action: The case of free lunch for children in China. Information Systems Journal, 26(3), 289–313.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations