“They have a lot more freedom than they know”: science education as a space for radical openness

Abstract

While much research has examined the impact that neoliberal reforms have had on education, very little research has examined science teachers/teaching in particular. In this article, we share findings from a longitudinal study with 9 public school science teachers in Arizona, USA. We argue that neoliberal reforms have positioned science classrooms and science teachers as high potential sites of/for resistance to neoliberalism. We identify two factors as particularly influential in shaping the way in which science teachers resist neoliberal reforms: (1) the marginalization of science within the structure of school and teacher assessments; and (2) widespread (science) teacher shortages.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Aggarwal, U. (2018). After rights: Choice and the structure of citizenship. In L. Fernandes (Ed.), Feminists rethink the neoliberal state: Inequality, exclusion, and change (pp. 71–105). New York, NY: New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479800155.003.0003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anyon, J. (2014). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203479704.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arizona School Personnel Administrators Association (ASPAA). (2016). Retrieved on 17 December, 2019 from: http://www.arizonaea.org/assets/document/AZ/ASPAA_SurveyResults_TeacherShortage09-06-16.pdf.

  4. Arizona Science Center. (2019). The STEM Teacher Shortage and Arizona’s Future: An Informational Brief About the Importance of Quality STEM Education. Retrieved on 17 December, 2019 from: https://www.azscience.org/media/2614/arizona-science-center-teacher-shortage-issue-brief-april2019.pdf.

  5. Au, W. (2016). Social justice and resisting neoliberal education reform in the USA. FORUM, 58(3), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.15730/forum.2016.58.3.315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A.R.S. § 15-816.01. Retrieved 16 December, 2019 from: https://www.azleg.gov/ars/15/00816-01.htm.

  7. Ball, S., & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivitiy under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Banilower, E., Smith, S., Malzahn, K., Plumley, C., Gordon, E. & Hayes, M. (2018). Report of the 2018 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Retrieved from http://horizon-research.com/NSSME/2018-nssme/research-products/reports/technical-report on 21 May 2020.

  9. Brathwait, J. (2017). Neoliberal education reform and the perpetuation of inequality. Critical Sociology, 43(3), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920516649418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Buxton, C. A. (2006). Creating contextually authentic science in a “Low-Performing” urban elementary school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 695–721. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carpenter, S., Weber, N., & Schugurensky, D. (2012). Views from the blackboard: Neoliberal education reforms and the practice of teaching in Ontario Canada. Globalisation, Societies, and Education, 10(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2012.647401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carter, L. (2014). The elephant in the room: Science education, neoliberalism and resistance. In J. Bencze & S. Alsop (Eds.), Activist science and technology education. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4360-1_2.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carter, L. (2015). Globalisation, neoliberalism and science education. In J. Zajda (Ed.), Second international handbook on globalisation, education and policy research. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9493-0_50.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cochran-Smith, M., Feiman-Nemser, S., McIntyre, J., & Demers, K. (2008). Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Crocco, M., & Costigan, A. (2007). The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy in the age of accountability: urban educators speak out. Urban Education, 42(6), 512–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085907304964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Darder, A. (2011). A dissident voice: Essays on culture, pedagogy, and power. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dunn, A. H. (2018). Leaving a profession after it’s left you: Teachers’ public resignation letters as resistance amidst neoliberalism. Teachers College Record, 120(9), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Education Week. (2019). Map: How much money each state spends. Retrieved on 17 December, 2019 from: https://www.edweek.org/ew/collections/quality-counts-2019-state-finance/map-per-pupil-spending-state-by-state.html.

  20. Fischer, H. (2017) Arizona Teaching jobs remain vacant well into school year. Arizona Daily Star. Retrieved on 19 December, 2019 from: https://tucson.com/news/local/wecontinue-to-worsen-nearly-arizona-teaching-jobs-remain-vacant/article_1c8d665a-a4225c7b-95b9-98afe0cb0c6f.html.

  21. Havekost, P. C. (2019). 2018 NSSME+: Status of middle school science. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hill, D., & Kumar, R. (2009). Global neoliberalism and education and its consequences. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891858.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hoeg, D., & Bencze, J. (2017). Values underpinning STEM education in the USA: An analysis of the next generation science standards. Science Education Policy, 101(2), 278–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hohmann, J. (2018). The daily 202: Koch network laying groundwork tofundamentally transform America’s education system. The Washington Post. Retrieved 16 December, 2019, from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2018/01/30/daily-202-koch-network-laying-groundwork-to-fundamentally-transform-america-s-education-system/.

  25. hooks, B. (1989). Choosing the margin as a space of radical openness. Framework: A Journal of Cinema and Media, 36, 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hursch, D. (2007). Assessing no child left behind and the rise of neoliberal education policies. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 493–518. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207306764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jerald, C. (2006). The hidden costs of curriculum narrowing. Issue Brief. The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement: Washington, DC.

  28. Macdonald, H., Zinth, J., & Pompelia, S. (2019). 50-State Comparison: High School Graduation requirements. Education Commission of the States. Retrieved on December 17, 2019 from: https://www.ecs.org/high-school-graduation-requirements/.

  29. Marx, R., & Harris, C. (2006). No child left behind and science education: Opportunities, challenges, and risks. The Elementary School Journal., 106(5), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1086/505441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2016). A Closer Look at the Charter School Movement. Retrieved on 17 December, 2019 from: http://www.publiccharters.org/sites/default/files/migrated/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/New-Closed-2016.pdf.

  31. National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Estimated average annual salary of teachers in public elementary and secondary schools, by state: Selected years, 1969–2070 through 2016–2017. Retrieved on 17 December, 2019 from: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/tables/dt17_211.60.asp.

  32. Pease-Alvarez, L., & Thompson, A. (2014). Teachers working together to resist and remake educational policy in contexts of standardization. Language Policy, 13(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9313-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Picower, B., & Mayorga, E. (Eds.). (2015). What’s race got to do with it? How current school reform policy maintains racial and economic inequality. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1476-2.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Plumley, C. L. (2019). 2018 NSSME+: Status of elementary school science. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Reeves, J. (2018). Teacher identity work in neoliberal schooling spaces. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rodriguez, A. J. (2010). Exposing the impact of opp (reg) ressive policies on teacher development and on student learning. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(4), 923–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-010-9281-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tolbert, S., & Bazzul, J. (2017). Toward the sociopolitical in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9737-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tolbert, S., Snook, N., Knox, C., & Udoinwang, I. (2016). Promoting youth empowerment and social change in/through school science. Journal of Activist Science and Technology Education, Special Issue (Counter)-Hegemony of STEM. Available online at http://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/jaste/article/view/26827/19851.

  39. Tolbert, S., Gray, S., Rivera, M., & Schindel, A. (2021). Teaching science to transgress: Toward a feminist praxis of/for science education. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  40. Turner, J. (2015). (En)gendering the political: Citizenship from marginal spaces. Citizenship Studies, 20(2), 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and choice in education: The school, the state, and the market. Australian Educational Review Limited: Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Williams, J. & Tolbert, S. (2018). Finding the freedom to resist: Connecting everyday and spectacular resistance. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space Online Forum on Walking out: Teaching, working, and striking on the neoliberal campus. Available online at http://societyandspace.org/2018/06/27/finding-the-freedom-to-resist-connecting-everyday-and-spectacular-resistance/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding from the Agnese Nelms Haury Program in Environment and Social Justice at the University of Arizona, faculty fellows program 2017-2019. Special thanks to the 9 teachers we had the privilege of collaborating with for this project. It was a privilege to work and learn alongside them about how we might find the capacity to create the kinds of educational spaces we believe in even in the face of structural constraints. Thanks to our research assistant, Caitlin Meyer Krause, for diligently completing the seemingly never-ending task of transcription.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Tolbert.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lead Editor: Lyn Carter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williams, J., Tolbert, S. “They have a lot more freedom than they know”: science education as a space for radical openness. Cult Stud of Sci Educ (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-10016-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Neoliberalism
  • Resistance
  • Science education
  • Teacher inquiry
  • Social justice