This paper dialogues with Lucy Avraamidou’s theoretical contribution Science Identity as a Landscape of Becoming: Rethinking Recognition and Emotionality through an Intersectionality Lens. Avraamidou discusses the centrality of recognition for science identities, and presents an argument for taking up intersectionality as an analytical lens for recognition. In this response, I review the contributions that Avraamidou’s article makes in advancing science identities research, and I then discuss ways of operationalizing intersectionality theory analytically. To illustrate ways that intersectionality can be mobilized to understand how recognition functions in science learning settings, I present examples from science identity researchers who have drawn on various theoretical frameworks to make this possible. I conclude with a discussion of the importance of considering space and time in recognition research, and how this can lead to more meaningful and intersectional research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with science. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 881–908.
Avraamidou, L. (2019). Science identity as a landscape of becoming: Rethinking recognition and emotions through an intersectionality lens. Cultural Studies of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09954-7.
Barthelemy, R., McCormick, M., & Henderson, C. (2016). Gender discrimination in physics and astronomy: Graduate student experiences of sexism and gender microaggressions. Physical Review Physics Education Research,12, 020119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020119.
Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black + Lesbian + Woman [not equal to] Black Lesbian Woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles,59, 312–325. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300750.
Brickhouse, N. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38(3), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3%3C282::AID-TEA1006%3E3.0.CO;2-0.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. Abingdon: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Abingdon: Routledge.
Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., Tan, E., O’Neill, T. B., Bautista-Guerra, J., & Brecklin, C. (2013). Crafting a future in science: Tracing middle school girls’ identity work over time and space. American Educational Research Journal,50, 37–75. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212458142.
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,44, 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237.
Collins, P. H. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology,41, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum (Vol. 1989), Article 8.
Crenshaw, K. (1990). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review,43, 1241.
Danielsson, A. T. (2012). Exploring woman university physics students’ ‘doing gender’ and ‘doing physics’. Gender and Education,24, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2011.565040.
Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist theory,9(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364.
Delgado, R. (1995). Critical race theory: The cutting edge. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Godec, S. (2018). Sciencey girls: Discourses supporting working-class girls to identify with science. Education Sciences,8(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010019.
Gonsalves, A. J., Danielsson, A., & Pettersson, H. (2016). Masculinities and experimental practices in physics: The view from three case studies. Physical Review Physics Education Research,12(2), 020120. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020120.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Holland, D., & Lave, J. (2001). History in person: Enduring struggles, contentious practice, intimate identities. Santa Fe: SAR Press.
Ingold, T. (2007). Lines: A brief history. New York, NY: Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive. New York, NY: Routledge.
Jackson, P. A., & Seiler, G. (2013). Science identity trajectories of latecomers to science in college. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,50(7), 826–857. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21088.
Johnson, A. (2019). An intersectional physics identity framework for studying physics settings. Manuscript in submission.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,11, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183998236863.
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,30(31), 1771–1800.
Nasir, N. I. (2011). Racialized identities: Race and achievement among African American youth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rahm, J. (2010). Science in the making at the margin. A multisited ethnography of learning and becoming in an afterschool program, a garden, and a math and science upward bound program. Rotterdam: Sense.
Rahm, J. (2016). Videomaking projects in STEM after-school clubs: A space-time analysis of one production and its implicit dialogue among identities, ways of knowing and doing in and with science. In Intersections of formal and informal science (pp. 95–107). Routledge.
Tonso, K. (2007). On the outskirts of engineering: Learning identity, gender, and power via engineering practice. Rotterdam: Sense.
Wade-Jaimes, K., & Scwartz, R. (2018). “I don’t think it’s science:” African American girls and the figured world of school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21521.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Lead Editor: J. K. Jaipal-Jamani.
This review essay addresses issues raised in Lucy Avraamidou’s paper entitled: Science identity as a landscape of becoming: rethinking recognition and emotions through an intersectionality lens (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09954-7).
About this article
Cite this article
Gonsalves, A.J. Operationalizing intersectionality to investigate the role of recognition in the landscape of becoming. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 15, 347–357 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09964-5
- Science identity