Abstract
The science laboratory is a politically entrenched space where complex power relations interplay while social agents learn about the rules and routines to ensure safety, precision and reproducibility in research work. This paper presents a case study of two Singaporean students undergoing apprenticeship in a 3-year school-based School Scientist Programme. They engaged in an open and authentic science inquiry involving chemical synthesis in the school’s science laboratory under the apprenticeship of an in-house School Scientist who started the programme. The goals of this paper are to offer an alternative—critical and nuanced—lens to the dominant positivist and social constructivist discourse about science research apprenticeship. Using visual ethnography approach, we collected videos and photographs of the students’ and School Scientist’s interactions during the science research over the first 18 months of the programme. The study documented critical events that showed shifts in control over knowledge construction and mastery of the chemical synthesis craft as the science research progressed. This paper contributes to the Foucauldian theory of power in offering an alternative view to the dialectical explanation of power and knowledge. First, it shows that while there is an overall gain in knowledge of chemical synthesis increased during the apprenticeship, the power relationship fluctuates when a different genre of chemical synthesis work was introduced. The fluctuation is related to the overtaking and relinquishing of control (power) with the latter leading to the construction of knowledge. Second, we show how the power relationship, involving the interplay of power and knowledge between the expert and apprentice, is more interconnected and complex. The findings of this study have implications for teachers who want to plan and enact authentic science inquiry with their students.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issues related to the Science Apprenticeship Camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 70–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200101).
Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understanding of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10086.
Bleicher, R. E. (1996). High school students learning science in university research laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 1115–1133. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199612).
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/2F0013189X018001032.
Burgin, S. R., & Sadler, T. D. (2013). Consistency of practical and formal epistemologies of science held by participants of a research apprenticeship. Research in Science Education, 43, 2179–2206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9351-4.
Burgin, S. R., Sadler, T. D., & Koroly, M. J. (2012). High school student participation in scientific research apprenticeships: Variation in and relationships among student experiences and outcomes. Research in Science Education, 42, 439–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199612).
Charney, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Sofer, W., Neigeborn, L., Coletta, S., & Nemeroff, M. (2007). Cognitive apprenticeship in science through immersion in laboratory practices. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560985.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In R. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Contu, A., & Willmott, H. (2003). Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory. Organization Science, 14(3), 227–351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.3.283.15167.
Crawford, B. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 916–937. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011).
Foucault, M. (1977). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Random House USA Inc.
Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A. (2007). Power and knowledge. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 172–189). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Grindstaff, K., & Richmond, G. (2008). Learners’ perceptions of the role of peers in a research experience: Implications for the apprenticeship process, scientific inquiry, and collaborative work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20196.
Hay, K. E., & Barab, S. A. (2001). Constructivism in practice: A comparison and contrast of apprenticeship and constructionist learning environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 281–322. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1003_3.
Henwood, F. (1998). Engineering difference: Discourses on gender, sexuality and work in a college of technology. Gender and Education, 10(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540259821087.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Puvirajah, A., Verma, G., & Webb, H. (2012). Examining the mediation of power in a collaborative community: Engaging in informal science as authentic practice. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, 375–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9394-2.
Ritchie, S. M., & Newlands, J. (2016). Emotional events in learning science. In A. Bellocchi, C. Quigley, & K. Otrel-Cass (Eds.), Exploring emotions, aesthetics and wellbeing in science education research. Dordrecht: Springer.
Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20326.
Seymour, E., Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L., & Deantoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88, 493–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10131.
Stake, J. E., & Mares, K. R. (2001). Science enrichment programs for gifted high school girls and boys: Predictors of program impact on science confidence and motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1065–1088. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10001.
Teo, T. W. (2013). Examining the performative quality of a teacher’s curriculum reform making through a metaphorical lens. Education as Change, 17(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2013.773928.
Teo, T. W., Goh, M. T., & Yeo, L. W. (2014). Chemistry education research trends: 2004–2013. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 470–487. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00104d.
Tobin, K., Ritchie, S. M., Oakley, J., Mergard, V., & Hudson, P. (2013). Relationships between emotional climate and the fluency of classroom interactions. Learning Environments Research, 16, 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9125-y.
van Langenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 14–31). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) under the start-up Grant (SUG33/12TTW) and administered by National Institute of Education (NIE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Singapore MOE and NIE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Lead Editor: Rachel Gisewhite.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teo, T.W., Tan, Y.L.K. Examining power, knowledge and power relations in a science research apprenticeship. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 15, 659–677 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09936-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09936-9