Dreaming and immanence: rejecting the dogmatic image of thought in science education

  • Jesse Bazzul
  • Maria F. G. Wallace
  • Marc Higgins


In this article, we, a multivocal-thinking-assemblage, trouble what we feel is the dogmatic image of thought in science education. Beginning with Lars Bang’s (Cult Stud Sci Educ, 2017) dramatic and disruptive imagery of the Ouroboros as a means to challenge scientific literacy we explore the importance of dreams, thinking with both virtual and actual entities, and immanent thinking to science education scholarship. Dreaming as movement away from a dogmatic image of thought takes the authors in multiple directions as they attempt to open Deleuzian horizons of difference, immanence, and self-exploration.


Ontology Deleuze Politics Science Virtual Critical theory 


  1. Bang, L. (2017). In the maw of the Ouroboros – an analysis of scientific literacy and democracy. Cultural Studies of Science Education.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9808-2.Google Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2000). Reconceiving scientific literacy as agential literacy. In R. Reed & S. Traweek (Eds.), Doing science + culture (pp. 221–258). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bazzul, J. (2015). Towards a politicized notion of citizenship for science education: Engaging the social through dissensus. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(3), 221–233.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2015.1051670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bazzul, J., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Toward a social ontology for science education: Introducing Deleuze and Guattari’s assemblages. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(3), 284–299.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1013016.Google Scholar
  5. Blades, D. W. (2006). Levinas and an ethics for science education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(5), 647–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braidotti, R. (2011). Nomadic theory: The portable Rosi Braidotti. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  9. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Deleuze, G., & Bacon, F. (2003). Francis Bacon: The logic of sensation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  11. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues II. (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1985). The history of sexuality. The use of pleasure (Vol. 2). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (2003). What is critique? In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The essential Foucault, selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984 (pp. 263–278). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (2014). Wrong-doing, truth-telling: The function of avowal in justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gough, N. (2004). RhizomANTically becoming-cyborg: Performing posthuman pedagogies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36, 253–265.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2004.00066.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gough, N. (2006). Shaking the tree, making a rhizome: Towards a nomadic geophilosophy of science education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38, 625–645.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00216.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gough, N., & Price, L. (2009). Rewording the world: Poststructuralism, deconstruction and the ‘real’ in environmental/science education research. In K. Setati, R. Vithal, C. Malcolm, & R. Dhunpath (Eds.), Researching possibilities in mathematics, science and technology education (pp. 55–70). New York, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  19. Haraway, D. (2013). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Higgins, M. (2017). Reconfiguring the optics of the critical gaze in science education (after the critique of critique): (Re)thinking “what counts” through foucaultian prismatics. Cultural Studies in Science Education.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9799-4.Google Scholar
  22. Kayumova, S., & Bazzul, J. (2017). The ethical, political potential of new materialisms for science education. In K. Scantlebury & C. Milne’s (Eds.), Material practice and materiality: Too long ignored in science education. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Krejsler, J. B. (2016). Seize the opportunity to think differently! A Deleuzian approach to unleashing becomings in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(14), 1475–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lorraine, T. (2011). Deleuze and Guattari's immanent ethics: Theory, subjectivity, and duration. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  25. May, T. (2005). Gilles Deleuze: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKenzie, M. (2009). Pedagogical transgression: Toward intersubjective agency and action. In M. McKenzie, P. Hart, H. Bai, & B. Jickling (Eds.), Fields of green: Restorying culture, environment, and education (pp. 211–226). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  27. Morphet, S. (2013). Suzanne Morphet. Writing and Photography. http://www.suzannemorphet.com/?page_id=725.
  28. Pavel, T. G. (1986). Fictional worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  30. Roth, W. M. (2015). Schooling is the problem: A plaidoyer for its deinstitutionalization. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(3), 315–331.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2015.1051672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wallace, M. F. G. (in press). Subjects in the threshold: Opening-up ethnographic moments that complicate the novice/veteran science teacher binary. Issues in Teacher Education: Special Issue. Google Scholar
  32. Wallin, J. J. (2014). Education needs to get a grip on life. In M. Carlin & J. Wallin (Eds.), Deleuze and Guattari, politics and education: For a people-yet-to-come (pp. 117–140). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  33. Weinstein, M., Blades, D., & Gleason, S. C. (2016). Questioning power: Deframing the STEM discourse. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 201–212.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1166294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jesse Bazzul
    • 1
  • Maria F. G. Wallace
    • 2
  • Marc Higgins
    • 3
  1. 1.University of ReginaReginaCanada
  2. 2.Louisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  3. 3.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations