Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of pyrovalerone as a possible synthetic by-product of 4′-methyl-α-pyrrolidinohexanophenone and 4-methyl-α-ethylaminopentiophenone in illicit drug products

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Forensic Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Impurity profiling is an important intelligence-gathering tool that can be used to link batches of drugs, and it provides valuable insights into manufacturing and supply trends in new psychoactive substances. In a routine analysis, we detected trace amounts of pyrovalerone in illicit drug products. In this study, we investigated the cause of pyrovalerone’s presence in the illicit drug products containing 4′-methyl-α-pyrrolidinohexanophenone (MPHP) or 4-methyl-α-ethylaminopentiophenone (4-methyl-α-EAPP).

Methods

We analyzed the compounds in illicit drug products and raw material using liquid chromatography–photodiode array detection, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry.

Results

We detected trace amounts of pyrovalerone in four illicit drug products containing MPHP or 4-methyl-α-EAPP. In every case, the amount of pyrovalerone in the illicit drug products was much lower than that of MPHP or 4-methyl-α-EAPP. We assumed that pyrovalerone was produced unintentionally. Structurally, pyrovalerone differs from MPHP with respect to the length of the alkyl side chain, and for 4-methyl-α-EAPP, the amine at the α-position is different (it bears an ethylamine instead of pyrrolidine). Pyrovalerone is thought to be produced in two different ways, as a synthetic by-product of both MPHP and 4-methyl-α-EAPP.

Conclusions

We assumed that pyrovalerone was derived from an impurity in a raw material or arose from contamination during the amination process. Impurity analysis, such as that described in this study, will aid in impurity profiling of cathinones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Leffler AM, Smith PB, Armas A, Dorman FL (2014) The analytical investigation of synthetic street drugs containing cathinone analogs. Forensic Sci Int 234:50–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Uchiyama N, Matsuda S, Kawamura M, Kikura-Hanajiri R, Goda Y (2013) Two new-type cannabimimetic quinolinyl carboxylates, QUPIC and QUCHIC, two new cannabimimetic carboxamide derivatives, ADB-FUBINACA and ADBICA, and five synthetic cannabinoids detected with a thiophene derivative α-PVT and an opioid receptor agonist AH-7921 identified in illegal products. Forensic Toxicol 31:223–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Uemura N, Fukaya H, Kanai C, Yoshida M, Nakajima J, Takahashi M, Suzuki J, Moriyasu T, Nakae D (2014) Identification of a synthetic cannabinoid A-836339 as a novel compound found in a product. Forensic Toxicol 32:45–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zaitsu K, Katagi M, Tsuchihashi H, Ishii A (2014) Recently abused synthetic cathinones, α-pyrrolidinophenone derivatives: a review of their pharmacology, acute toxicity, and metabolism. Forensic Toxicol 32:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zuba D, Geppert B, Sekuła K, Żaba C (2013) [1-(Tetrahydropyran-4-ylmethyl)-1H-indol-3-yl]-(2, 2, 3, 3-tetramethylcyclopropyl) methanone: a new synthetic cannabinoid identified on the drug market. Forensic Toxicol 31:281–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kohyama E, Chikumoto T, Tada H, Kitaichi K, Ito K (2017) Analytical differentiation of quinolinyl- and isoquinolinyl-substituted 1-(5-fluoropentyl)-1H-indole-3-carboxylates: 5F-PB-22 and its ten isomers. Forensic Toxicol 35:56–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kikura-Hanajiri R, Uchiyama N, Kawamura M, Goda Y (2013) Changes in the prevalence of new psychoactive substances before and after the introduction of the generic scheduling of synthetic cannabinoids in Japan. Drug Test Anal 6:832–839

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dayrit FM, Dumlao MC (2004) Impurity profiling of methamphetamine hydrochloride drugs seized in the Philippines. Forensic Sci Int 144:29–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. King LA, Clarke K, Orpet AJ (1994) Amphetamine profiling in the UK. Forensic Sci Int 69:65–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kavanagh PV, Power JD (2014) New psychoactive substances legislation in Ireland—perspectives from academia. Drug Test Anal 6:884–891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pütz M, Schneiders S, Auwärter V, Münster-Müller S, Scheid N (2015) The EU-project ‘SPICE-profiling’ (2015–2017)—objectives and results of a first study on spice products containing 5F-PB-22. Toxichem Krimtech 82:273–283

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heather E, Bortz A, Shimmon R, McDonagh AM (2017) Organic impurity profiling of methylone and intermediate compounds synthesized from catechol. Drug Test Anal 9:436–445

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Archer RP (2009) Fluoromethcathinone, a new substance of abuse. Forensic Sci Int 185:10–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Meltzer PC, Butler D, Deschamps JR, Madras BK (2006) 1-(4-Methylphenyl)-2-pyrrolidin-1-yl-pentan-1-one (pyrovalerone) analogues: a promising class of monoamine uptake inhibitors. J Med Chem 49:1420–1432

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Asada A, Doi T, Takeda A, Tagami T, Kawaguchi M, Satsuki Y, Sawabe Y (2015) Identification of analogs of LY2183240 and the LY2183240 2′-isomer in herbal products. Forensic Toxicol 33:311–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Doi T, Asada A, Takeda A, Tagami T, Katagi M, Matsuda S, Kamata H, Kawaguchi M, Satsuki Y, Sawabe Y, Obana H (2016) Identification and characterization of α-PVT, α-PBT, and their bromothienyl analogs found in illicit drug products. Forensic Toxicol 34:76–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McDermott SD, Power JD, Kavanagh P, O’Brien J (2011) The analysis of substituted cathinones. Part 2: an investigation into the phenylacetone based isomers of 4-methylmethcathinone and N-ethylcathinone. Forensic Sci Int 212:13–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Westphal F, Junge T, Girreser U, Greibl W, Doering C (2012) Mass, NMR and IR spectroscopic characterization of pentedrone and pentylone and identification of their isocathinone by-products. Forensic Sci Int 217:157–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Uchiyama N, Matusda S, Kawamura M, Shimokawa Y, Kikura-Hanajiri R, Aritake K, Urade Y, Goda Y (2014) Characterization of four new designer drugs, 5-chloro-NNEI, NNEI indazole analog, α-PHPP and α-POP, with 11 newly distributed designer drugs in illegal products. Forensic Sci Int 243:1–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Uchiyama N, Shimokawa Y, Kawamura M, Kikura-Hanajiri R, Hakamatsuka T (2014) Chemical analysis of a benzofuran derivative, 2-(2-ethylaminopropyl) benzofuran (2-EAPB), eight synthetic cannabinoids, five cathinone derivatives, and five other designer drugs newly detected in illegal products. Forensic Toxicol 32:266–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI Grant no. 15K08834.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takaomi Tagami.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no financial or other relations that could lead to a conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tagami, T., Doi, T., Takeda, A. et al. Detection of pyrovalerone as a possible synthetic by-product of 4′-methyl-α-pyrrolidinohexanophenone and 4-methyl-α-ethylaminopentiophenone in illicit drug products. Forensic Toxicol 36, 506–513 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-018-0407-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-018-0407-z

Keywords

Navigation