Meeting the Developmental Needs of Young Adults Diagnosed with Serious Mental Health Challenges: the Emerge Model

Abstract

Adult providers struggle to engage 18–25-year olds despite high rates of serious mental health challenges observed among this age group. A new model, called “Emerge,” combines the intensive outreach and multidisciplinary team-based approach used in Assertive Community Treatment with Positive Youth Development principles and practices used in the Transition to Independence Process Model. Emerge bridges youth and adult services, focuses on supporting transition-to-adulthood milestone achievement, and is a sister team to Coordinated Specialty Care for recent psychosis onset. This paper describes Emerge components, practices, and findings from a feasibility pilot study using agency administrative data. Most prevalent goals were employment and social support/relationship related. The majority made progress on individual goals, engaged in employment and education, and experienced decreased psychiatric hospitalizations. Community mental health policy and practice implications are discussed, including funding blending of evidence-based practices for those transitioning to adulthood with youth-onset serious mental health conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. 1.

    Government Accountability Office (GAO). Young adults with serious mental illness. Some states and federal agencies are taking steps to address their transition challenges. GAO-08-678. Report to Congressional Requesters; 2008. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08678.pdf.

  2. 2.

    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. Behavioral health trends in the United States: results from the 2014 national survey on drug use and health (HHS Publication No. SMA 15–4927, NSDUH Series H-50); 2015. http://www.samhsa.gov/data/

  3. 3.

    Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, et al. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2005; 62:593–602. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Aquilino W. Family relationships and support systems in emerging adulthood. In Arnett JJ, Tanner JL, eds. Emerging adults in America: coming of age in the 21st century. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2006: 193–217.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lapsley DK, Edgerton J. Separation-individuation, adult attachment style, and college adjustment. Journal of Counseling and Development. 2011; 80(4): 484–492. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2002.tb00215.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wagner M, Newman L. Longitudinal transition outcomes of youth with emotional disturbances. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2012; 35(3): 199–208. https://doi.org/10.2975/35.3.2012.199.208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: the winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Erickson EH, ed. Youth: change and challenge. New York, Basic Books; 1963.

  9. 9.

    Bruns EJ, Suter J. Summary of wraparound evidence base: April 2010 update. In E. J. Bruns & J. S. Walker, ed. Resource guide to wraparound. Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative, Research and Training Center for Family Support and Children’s Mental Health.

  10. 10.

    Munson MR, Jaccard J, Smalling SE, et al. Static, dynamic, integrated, and contextualized: a framework for understanding mental health service utilization among young adults. Social Sciences & Medicine. 2012; 75(8):1441–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hodgekins J, Birchwood M, Christopher R, et al. Investigating trajectories of social recovery in individuals with first-episode psychosis: a latent class growth analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2015; 207(6):536–543. doi: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.153486

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lee SJ, Kim KR, Lee SY, An SK. Impaired social role and function in ultra-high risk for psychosis and first episode schizophrenia: its relations with negative symptoms. Psychiatric Investigation. 2017; 14(5):539–545. doi:https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2017.14.5.539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Klodnick VV, Samuels GM. Building home on a cliff: aging out of child welfare with serious mental health challenges. Journal of Child & Family Social Work. Online first 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12747

  14. 14.

    Sheidow A, Zajac K, Davis M. Prevalence and impact of substance use among emerging adults with serious mental health conditions. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2013; 35(3):235–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.2975/35.3.2012.235.243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. Results from the 2018 national survey on drug use and health: graphics from the key findings report; 2018. Retrieved from https://datafiles.samhsa.gov/

  16. 16.

    Vander SA, Davis M, Collins D. Transition: a time of development and institutional clashes. Transition to adulthood: a resource for assisting young people with emotional or behavioral difficulties. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zajac K, Sheidow AJ, Davis M. Transition age youth with mental health challenges in the juvenile justice system. Washington, DC: Technical Assistance Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health.

  18. 18.

    Havlicek J, Garcia A, Smith DC. Mental health and substance use disorders among foster youth transitioning to adulthood: past research and future directions. Children and Youth Services Review. 2013; 35(1):194–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Whitbeck LB, Johnson KD, Hoyt DR, et al. Mental disorder and comorbidity among runaway and homeless adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2004; 35(2):132–140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Drake RE, Skinner JS, Bond GR, et al. Social security and mental illness: reducing disability with supported employment. Health Affairs. 2009; 28(3):761–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Davis M, Green M, Hoffman C. The service system obstacle course for transition-age youth and young adults. In HB Clark, D. Unruh, ed(s). Transition of youth and young adults with emotional or behavioral difficulties: an evidence-based handbook. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, Co.; 2009: 25–46.

  22. 22.

    Singh SP, Tuomainen H. Transition from child to adult mental health services: needs, barriers, experiences and new models of care. World Psychiatry. 2015; 14(3):358–361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20266

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ungar M, Liebenberg L, Ikeda J. Young people with complex needs: designing coordinated interventions to promote resilience across child welfare, juvenile corrections, mental health and education services. British Journal of Social Work. 2012; 44(3): 675–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Johnson SB, Blum RW, Giedd JN. Adolescent maturity and the brain: the promise and pitfalls of neuroscience research in adolescent health policy. The Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. 2009; 45(3):216–221. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.05.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Fry R. For first time in modern era, living with parents edges out other living arrangements for 18- to 34-year-olds. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    National Institute of Mental Health. Recovery after an initial schizophrenia episode (RAISE). What is RAISE?; 2018. http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/schizophrenia/raise/index.shtml

  27. 27.

    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. Now is the time technical assistance center (NITT-TA). Healthy transitions grant information; 2018. http://www.samhsa.gov/nitt-ta/healthy-transitions-grant-information

  28. 28.

    Bello I, Lee R., Malinovsky I, et al. OnTrackNY: The development of a coordinated specialty care program for individuals experiencing early psychosis. Psychiatric Services. 2017; 68(4):318–320. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201600512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Mueser KT, Penn DL, Addington, J, et al. The NAVIGATE program for first-episode psychosis: rationale, overview, and description of psychosocial components. Psychiatric Services. 2015; 66(7):680–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201400413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wright K, Reeder S. Maryland healthy transitions (MD-HT): evidence-based practice dissemination and implementation. Now is the time technical assistance center; 2015. http://bha.dhmh.maryland.gov/Documents/Session-16-MD-Implementation-and-EBPs-PPT.pdf

  31. 31.

    Latmier E. Economic considerations associated with assertive community treatment and supported employment for people with severe mental illness. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience. 2005; 30(5):355–359.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA). Assertive community treatment evidence-based practices KIT; 2008. https://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content/SMA08-4345/Brochure-ACT.pdf

  33. 33.

    McGrew JH, Danner M. Evaluation of an intensive case management program for transition age youth and its transition to assertive community treatment. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation. 2009; 12:278–294. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15487760903066503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Minnesota Department of Human Services. Bulletin #15–53-02. Children’s mental health division: youth assertive community treatment; 2015. http://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/idcplg?IdcService=GET_DYNAMIC_CONVERSION&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&dDocName=dhs16_175482

  35. 35.

    Dresser K, Clark HB, Deschenes N. Implementation of a positive development, evidence-supported practice for emerging adults with serious mental health conditions: the transition to independence process (TIP) model. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2015; 42(2): 223–237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-014-9438-3.

  36. 36.

    National Network on Youth Transition for Behavioral Health (NNYT). Theory and research underpinnings supporting the transition to independence process (TIP) model; 2016. http://www.tipstars.org/portals/0/pdf/TIPModelTheoryResearchSumEBDTIPWEBSITE032712GOOD.pdf

  37. 37.

    Clark HB, Unruh DK, eds. Transition of youth and young adults with emotional or behavioral difficulties: an evidence-supported handbook. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Heinssen RK, Goldstein AB, Azrin, ST. Evidence-based treatments for first episode psychosis: components of coordinated specialty care; 2014. http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/schizophrenia/raise/nimh-white-paper-csc-for-fep_147096.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lucksted A, Essock SM, Stevenson J, et al. Client views of engagement in the RAISE connection program for early psychosis recovery. Psychiatric Services. 2015; 66(7): 699–704. doi: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201400475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). SAMHSA’s working definition of recovery: 10 guiding principles of recovery; 2017. https://store.samhsa.gov/product/SAMHSA-s-Working-Definition-of-Recovery/PEP12-RECDEF

  41. 41.

    Cheng H, McDermott, RC, Lopez FG. Mental health, self-stigma, and help-seeking intentions among emerging adults: an attachment perspective. The Counseling Psychologist. 2015; 43(3): 463–487. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000014568203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ellison ML, Klodnick VV, Bond GR, et al. Adapting supported employment for emerging adults with serious mental health conditions. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2015; 42(2): 206–222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-014-9445-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Frederick DE, VanderWeele TJ. Supported employment: meta-analysis and review of randomized controlled trials of individual placement and support. PLoS One. 2019; 14(2): e0212208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212208.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Drake RE, Bond GR, Becker DR. IPS supported employment: an evidence-based approach. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Nuechterlein KH, Subotnik KL, Turner LR, et al. Individual placement and support for individuals with recent-onset schizophrenia: integrating supported education and supported employment. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2008; 31:340–349. doi: https://doi.org/10.2975/31.4.2008.340.349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Johnson M. Austin MJ. Evidence-based practice in social services. Journal of Evidence Based Social Work. 2008; 5(1–2):239–269. doi: https://doi.org/10.1300/J394v05n01_09.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental eisorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    American Association of Community Psychiatrists. Level of care utilization system for psychiatric and addiction services; 2009. http://www.dhs.state.il.us/OneNetLibrary/27896/documents/By_Division/MentalHealth/FY2011/Locus2010/LOCUS2010.pdf

  49. 49.

    Munson M, Cole A, Stanhope V, et al. Cornerstone program for transition-age youth with serious mental illness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016; 17: 537. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1654-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Burns T, Catty J, White S, et al. The impact of supported employment and working on clinical and social functioning: results of an international study of individual placement and support. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2009; 35(5): 949–958. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbn024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gold PB, Macias C, Rodican CF. Does competitive work improve quality of life for adults with severe mental illness? Evidence from a randomized trial of supported employment. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2016; 43(2):155–171. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-014-9392-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Luciano A, Meara E. The employment status of people with mental illness: national survey data from 2009 and 2010. Psychiatric Services. 2014; 65(10): 1201–1209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201300335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Kane JM, Robinson DG, Schooler NR, et al. Comprehensive versus usual community care for first episode psychosis: two-year outcomes from the NIMH RAISE early treatment program. The American Journal of Psychiatry. 2016; 173(4):362–372. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15050632.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Illinois General Assembly. Early mental health act. Bill status of SB2951, 100th General Assembly; 2018. http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=2951&GAID=14&GA=100&DocTypeID=SB&LegID=110304&SessionID=91.

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) #90SF0008-01-00.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanessa V. Klodnick PhD, LCSW.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Klodnick is the Thresholds Youth & Young Adult Services Director of Research & Innovation and completed her NIDILRR Switzer Research Fellowship at Thresholds. Dr. Klodnick is also a UT-Austin Texas Institute Excellence in Mental Health affiliate faculty. Candy Malina is the Senior Director of Clinical Practice who oversees Youth & Young Adult Service development and implementation. Dr. Fagan is a Vice President of Clinical Operations at Thresholds, overseeing Youth & Young Adult Services. Rebecca Johnson is an Evaluation Coordinator for Thresholds Youth & Young Adult Services Research & Evaluation. Ariel Brenits is an Evaluation Specialist for Thresholds Evaluation. Eva Zeidner is Emerge Assistant Program Director. Jose Viruet is the Emerge Program Director. We have no special interests to report.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klodnick, V.V., Malina, C., Fagan, M.A. et al. Meeting the Developmental Needs of Young Adults Diagnosed with Serious Mental Health Challenges: the Emerge Model. J Behav Health Serv Res 48, 77–92 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-020-09699-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Transition-age youth
  • Serious mental health conditions
  • Multidisciplinary team-based treatment
  • Community mental health
  • Program evaluation
  • Emerging adulthood