Learning through collaborative design of location-based games

Article

Abstract

This paper describes the design, deployment, analysis, and evaluation of a learning scenario focused on exploring the educational potential of location-based games. Through its design and rationale, the scenario serves as an illustration of how students can learn through the collaborative design and playing of location-based games. It involves an exploration of the pedagogical potential of students as game designers, through a study of students designing location-based games for peers in order to learn history. This shows the potential of using both authoring tools to have students engage creatively with subject matter and as a focal point of collaborative learning activity. As the topic of the scenario revolved around learning about history, we also found that the ways they relate to this topic when using location-based games offers a new way of integrating curricula in learning activities, and that it is key to think beyond a single subject and look at cross-curricular elements and goals in such scenarios. We offer a very detailed description and analysis of the practical accomplishment of the learning activities involved in the collaborative design of location-based games.

Keywords

Learning through design Game design Location-based games History learning Design research Constructionism Video analysis 

References

  1. Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2006). Education for the knowledge age. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 695–713). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Bennerstedt, U. & Linderoth, T. (2009). The spellbound ones: Illuminating everyday collaborative gaming practices in a MMORPG. In: C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning - Vol 1 (CSCL’09). International Society of the Learning Sciences, 1, 404–413.Google Scholar
  4. Bonderup Dohn, N. (2009). Web 2.0: Inherent tensions and evident challenges for education. ijcscl, 4(3), 343–363.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, A. (2015). 3D printing in instructional settings: Identifying a curricular hierarchy of activities. TechTrends, 59(5), 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, B., & Juhlin, O. (2015). Enjoying machines. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bruns, A. (2007). Produsage. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition - C&C ‘07 (p. 99–106). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1254960.1254975.
  9. Chang, B., Wang, H.-Y., Chen, C.-S., & Liang, J.-K. (2009). Distributed weather net: Wireless sensor network supported by inquiry-based learning. In C. O'Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices: CSCL2009 Conference Proceedings (pp. 365–369). Rhodes, Greece. July 2009.Google Scholar
  10. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2016) Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corneli, J. (2014). Peer Produced Peer Learning. A Mathematics Case Study. PhD thesis. In The Open University http://oro.open.ac.uk/40775/.Google Scholar
  13. Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221–7.Google Scholar
  14. Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. New York, NY: Berg Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., Hall, R., Koschmann, T., Lemke, J. L., Sherin, M. G., & Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology and ethics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edfjeldt, C., Fjordevik, A., & Inose, H. (2006). Fan culture as informal learning environment. In Proceedings of the NGL 2012 Next Generation Learning Conference (pp. 105-113). February 21-23, 2012. Sweden: Falun.Google Scholar
  17. El-Nasr, M. S., & Smith, B. K. (2006). Learning through game modding. Computers in Entertainment, 4(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., Delacruz, G., & Kumar, M. (2012). Learning physics through play in an augmented reality environment. ijcscl, 7(3), 347–378.Google Scholar
  19. Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., & DeLiema, D. (2015). Constructing liminal blends in a collaborative augmented-reality learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(1), 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fischer, G. (2009). End-user development and meta-design : Foundations for cultures of participation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5435, 3–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00427-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fischer, G. & Herrmann, T. (2015). Meta-Design: Transforming and Enriching the Design and Use of Socio-Technical Systems. In D. Randall, K. Schmidt, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Designing Socially Embedded Technologies: A European Challenge, p. 79–109. Available at: http://l3d.cs.colorado.edu/ ~gerhard/papers/2014/EUSSET.pdf
  22. FitzGerald, E. (2012). Creating user-generated content for location-based learning: An authoring framework. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Forte, A. (2015). The new information literate: Open collaboration and information production in schools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(1), 35–51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9210-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gabrielson, C. (2013). Tinkering – Kids learn by making stuff. Maker Media. ISBN 978-1449361013.Google Scholar
  25. Gerson, E. M., & Star, S. L. (1986). Analyzing due-process in the workplace. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 4(3), 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guribye, F. (2015). From artifacts to infrastructures in studies of learning practices. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 22, 184–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guribye, F., Wake, J., & Wasson, B. (2014). The practical accomplishment of location-based game-play: Design and analysis of mobile collaborative gaming. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 6(3), 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research. Analysing social interaction in everyday life. SAGE Publications Ltd..Google Scholar
  30. Holmes, J., & Gee, E. (2016). A framework for understanding game-based teaching and learning. On the horizon, 24(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jefferson, G. (1984). Transcript notation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge University press, Cambridge (pp. 9–16).Google Scholar
  32. Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Clinton, K., Weigel, M., & Robison, A. J. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.Google Scholar
  33. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kafai, Y. (2006). Playing and making games for learning. Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games and Culture, 1(1), 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mawhaw, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Kang, M. J., & Glassman, M. (2011). The logic of wikis: The possibilities of the web 2.0 classroom. ijcscl, 6(1), 93–112.Google Scholar
  37. Ke, F. (2007). Using Computer-based Math Games as an Anchor for Cooperative Learning. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, (pp. 354–356). New Brunswick, USA, 16–21 July, 2007.Google Scholar
  38. Ke, F. (2008). Alternative goal structures for computer game-based learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(4), 429–445.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9048-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim, B., Tan, L., & Bielaczyc, K. (2015). Learner-generated designs in participatory culture: What they are and how they are shaping learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(5), 545–555.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1067974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Klopfer, E., Perry, J., Squire, K., Jan, M.-F., & Steinkuehler, C. (2005). Mystery at the museum: A collaborative game for museum education. Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, (pp. 316–320). Taipei, Taiwan, May 30 –June 4, 2005.Google Scholar
  41. Koschmann, T., Stahl, G., & Zemel, A. (2007). The video analyst's manifesto (or the implications of Garfinkel's policies for the development of a program of video analytic research within the learning sciences). In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 133–144). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Laurillard, D. (2009). The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lim, C. P. (2008). Spirit of the game: Empowering students as designers in schools? British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 996–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lyons, L. (2009). Designing opportunistic user interfaces to support a collaborative museum exhibit, In: C. O'Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices: CSCL2009 Conference Proceedings (pp. 375–384). Rhodes, Greece, July 2009.Google Scholar
  45. Martinez, S., & Stager, G. S. (2014). The maker movement; a learning revolution. Learning and Leading with Technology, 41(7), 12–17.Google Scholar
  46. Mills Kelly, T. (2013). Teaching History in the Digital Age. Ann Arbor, MI. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  47. Ministry of Knowledge (2012). Framework for basic competencies. Available from: http://www.udir.no/Upload/larerplaner/lareplangrupper/RAMMEVERK_grf_2012.pdfGoogle Scholar
  48. Orvieto, I. (2012). Developing Educational Games. In: M.D. Kickmeier-Rust & D. Albert. (Eds.), An Aliens Guide to Multi-Adaptive Educational Computer Games, pp. 21–40. Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press.Google Scholar
  49. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York, USA: Basic Books Inc..Google Scholar
  50. Resnick, M. (2007). Sowing the seeds for a more creative society. Learning and Leading with Technology, 18–22.Google Scholar
  51. Resnick, M. (2012). Reviving Papert's dream. Educational Technology, 52(4), 42–46.Google Scholar
  52. Resnick, M., & Ocko, S. (1991). LEGO/logo: Learning through and about design. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism. Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. Resnick, M., Ocko, S., & Papert, S. (1988). Lego, logo, and design. Children's Environments Quarterly, 5(4), 14–18.Google Scholar
  54. Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch, programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 404–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roschelle, J., & Pea, R. (2002). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Cognition and Technology, 1(1), 145–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roschelle, J., Rosas, R. & Nussbaum, M. (2005). Towards a design framework for mobile computer-supported collaborative learning. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: The next 10 Years! Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  57. Rosenbaum, E., Klopfer, E., Broughner, B., & Rosencheck, L. (2007). Engaging Students in Science Controversy Through an Augmented Reality Role-Playing Game. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, (pp. 608–612). New Brunswick, USA, 16–21 July, 2007.Google Scholar
  58. Salen, K., & Zimmerman. (2004). Rules of play. Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  59. Satwitcz, T., & Stevens, R. (2007). Tools of Play: Coordinating Games, Characters, and Actions While Learning to Play Video Games. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, (pp. 629–638). New Brunswick, USA, 16–21 July, 2007.Google Scholar
  60. Schwarz, D. & Stoecker, M. (2012). Designing Learning Games. In: M.D. Kickmeier-Rust & D. Albert. (Eds.) An Aliens Guide to Multi-Adaptive Educational Computer Games, (pp. 5–19). Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press.Google Scholar
  61. Sengupta-Irving, T., & Enyedy, N. (2015). Why engaging in mathematical practices may explain stronger outcomes in affect and engagement: Comparing student-driven with highly guided inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(4), 550–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile learning. Small devices, big issues. In N. Balachaeff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Principles and products (pp. 233–249). Milton Keynes: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations. Plans and situated actions (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Tan, T.-H., Liu, T.-Y., & Chang, C.-C. (2007). Development and evaluation of an RFID-based ubiquitous learning environment for outdoor learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(3), 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wake, J. D. (2013). Mobile, location-based games for learning. Developing, deploying and evaluating mobile game technology in education. Doctoral thesis: University of Bergen.Google Scholar
  66. Wake, J.D., Guribye, F. & Wasson, B. (2015). Students’ Design Decisions in Collaborative Design of Location-Based Games for Learning. In: O. Lindwall, P. Häkkinen, T. Koschmann, P. Tchounikine, & S. Ludvigsen (Eds): Exploring the Material Conditions of Learning: The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 2015, (324–331). June 7–11, 2015, Gothenburg, Sweden. International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS). ISBN 978-0-9903550-6-9.Google Scholar
  67. Weilenmann, A., Säljö, R., & Engström, A. (2014). Mobile video literacy: Negotiating the use of a new visual technology. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(3), 737–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. White, T. (2006). Code talk: Student discourse and participation with networked handhelds. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wilkinson, K., & Petrich, M. (2014). The Art of Tinkering. San Francisco. CA: Weldon Owen.Google Scholar
  70. Woolgar, S. (1992). Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters. Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 58–99). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Yatani, K., Onuma, M., Sugimoto, M., & Kusunoki, F. (2004). Musex: A system for supporting children’s collaborative learning in a museum with PDAs. Systems and Computers in Japan, 35(14), 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. 2018
corrected publication May/2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jo Dugstad Wake
    • 1
  • Frode Guribye
    • 2
  • Barbara Wasson
    • 2
  1. 1.Uni Research HealthBergenNorway
  2. 2.University of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations