Skip to main content
Log in

International equities listed on the New York stock exchange: does type of issue or date of issue matter?

  • Published:
Financial Markets and Portfolio Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The initial short-term (21-day) and long-term (3-year) excess returns for foreign initial public offering (IPO) and seasoned equity offering (SEO) American depository receipts (ADRs) listed on the New York stock exchange from 1990 to 2009 are tested to determine differences in performance based on type of issue and date of issue for the decades of the 1990s and the 2000s. The overall sample outperformed the S&P 500 Index by over 5 % after the first 3 years of trading; however, SEO ADRs outperformed IPO ADRs by nearly 19 % (relative to the market index). Breaking IPO and SEO ADR returns down by decade of issue shows that those listed in the 2000s for both samples drastically outperformed those listed in the 1990s in the long term. Both samples of ADRs listed in the 2000s also significantly outperformed the S&P 500 index in the first 36 months of trading. In the short-term results, for the first 21 days of trading, the SEO ADRs significantly outperformed the market by 2.1 %, while IPO ADRs outperformed by 0.97 % (though not significant).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brav, A., Gompers, P.: Myth or reality? The long-run underperformance of initial public offerings: evidence from venture and nonventure capital-backed companies. J. Finance. 52, 1791–1821 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, J., Kleiman, R., Sahu, A.: The market-adjusted investment performance of ADR. IPOs and SEOs. Global Finance J. 10, 123–145 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foerster, S., Karolyi, G.A.: The long-run performance of global equity offerings. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 35, 499–528 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giro, J.A.: The dual listing puzzle: evidence from the ADR market. Financial Markets Portfolio Manag. 11, 329–346 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibbotson, R.: Price performance of common stock new issues. J. Financial Econ. 2, 235–272 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, C.: Diversification with American depository receipts: the dynamics and the pricing factors. J. Business Finance Account. 25, 683–699 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J., Fisher, A.: New-issue stock price behavior. J. Finance. 27, 97–102 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, B., Hammond, C.: A study of underwriters’ experience with unseasoned new issues. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 9, 165–177 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, B., LaChapelle, C.: Unseasoned new issue price performance on three tiers: 1975–1980. Financial Manag. 12, 23–28 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Officer, D., Hoffmeister, R.: ADRs: a substitute for the real thing? J. Portfolio Manag. 13, 61–65 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, J.: The long-run performance of initial public offerings. J. Finance. 46, 3–27 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaub, M.: Investment performance of American depository receipts listed on the New York stock exchange: long and short. J. Business Econ. Stud. 9, 1–19 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaub, M.: Market timing wealth effects of Asia Pacific and European ADRs traded on the NYSE. Appl. Financial Econ. 14, 1059–1066 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaub, M.: Market timing effects on the investment performance of NASDAQ-listed ADRs: the cases of emerging and developed market issues. J. Invest. 16, 119–126 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaub, M.: NASDAQ-listed European and Asia Pacific ADRs: does market timing affect long-term performance? Appl. Financial Econ. 19, 339–345 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaub, M., Highfield, M.: The short and long term performance of IPOs and SEOs traded as American depository deceipts: does timing matter? J. Asset Manag. 5, 263–271 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaub, M., Highfield, M.: Market timing wealth effects of American depository receipts: the cases of emerging and developed market issues. J. Int. Financial Markets Inst. Money. 16, 270–282 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildmann, C.: What drives portfolio investments of German banks in emerging capital markets? Financial Markets Portfolio Manag. 25, 197–231 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the assistance, direction, and excellent advice provided by the editor and an anonymous referee. Thanks for helping make the paper much better.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Schaub.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schaub, M. International equities listed on the New York stock exchange: does type of issue or date of issue matter?. Financ Mark Portf Manag 26, 429–447 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-012-0197-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-012-0197-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation