We present a study of the European electronic interbank market of overnight lending (e-MID) before and after the beginning of the financial crisis. The main goal of the paper is to explain the structural changes of lending/borrowing features due to the liquidity turmoil. Unlike previous contributions that focused on banks’ dependent and macro information as explanatory variables, we address the role of banks’ behaviour and market microstructure as determinants of the credit spreads. We show that all banks experienced significant variations in their liquidity costs due to the sensitivity of interbank rates to the timing and side of trades. We argue that, while larger banks did experience better funding conditions after the crisis, this was not just a consequence of the “too big to fail” perception of the market. Larger banks have been able to play more strategically when managing their liquidity by taking advantage of the changing market microstructure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
While our main cross-sectional regression results do not incorporate banks’ specific characteristics other than size and nationality, we perform an additional robustness check using a panel data model with time and bank fixed effects that can capture bank characteristics such as credit and liquidity risk.
Baglioni and Monticini (2013) use the main refinancing rate as reference. We choose to estimate the spread with respect to the average market rate so that the spread is not directly affected by official rates and monetary policy decisions.
Although the market is open 8 a.m.–6 p.m., in Fig. 4 we consider only the data 9 a.m.–5 p.m. because only in Greece and Portugal markets are open 8–9 a.m. and 5–6 p.m.
Temizsoy et al. (2015), performing link-level rather than bank-level regressions, and show that the effect of the microstructure variable is qualitatively the same also when controlling for the identity of the counterparty to a trade as well as when including indices of preferential lending and borrowing among the regression variables.
Acharya VV, Merrouche O (2013) Precautionary hoarding of liquidity and inter-bank markets: evidence from the sub-prime crisis. Rev Finance 17(1):107–160
Angelini P, Nobili A, Picillo C (2011) The interbank market after August 2007: what has changed and why? J Money Credit Bank 43(5):923–958
Baglioni A, Monticini A (2008) The intraday price of money: evidence from the e-MID interbank market. J Money Credit Bank 40(7):1533–1540
Baglioni A, Monticini A (2013) Why does the interest rate decline over the day? Evidence from the liquidity crisis. J Financ Serv Res 44(2):175–186
Barucca P, Lillo F (2018) The organization of the interbank network and how ECB unconventional measures affected the e-MID overnight market. Comput Manag Sci 15(1):33–53
Barucci E, Impenna C, Renò R (2004) The Italian overnight market: Microstructure effects, the martingale hypothesis and the payment system. In: Bagella M, Bechetti L, Hasan I, Hunter WC (eds) Monetary integration, markets and regulations—research in banking and finance, vol 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 319–360
Beaupain R, Durré A (2008) The interday and intraday patterns of the overnight market. Evidence from an electronic platform. European Central Bank Working Paper 988
Beaver WH, Lambert RA, Morse D (1980) The information content of security prices. J Account Econ 2(1):3–28
Berardi S, Tedeschi G (2017) From banks’ strategies to financial (in)stability. Int Rev Econ Finance 47:255–272
Brousseau V, Manzanares A (2005) A look at intraday frictions in the Euro Area overnight deposit market. European Central Bank Working Paper 439
Brunetti H, Harris JF, Mankad S, Michailidis G (2015) Interconnectedness in the interbank market. FEDS Working Paper 2015-090, SSRN 2674602
Bushman RM, McDermott KE, Williams CD (2012) The earnings announcement premium and volume concentration. Kenan-Flagler Business School Working Paper, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Campbell JY (1993) Intertemporal asset pricing without consumption data. Am Econ Rev 83(3):487–512
Carletti E, Leonello A (2018) Credit market competition and liquidity crises. Rev. Finance. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfy026 (In press)
Cassola N, Holthausen C, Duca ML (2010) The 2007/2008 turmoil: a challenge for the integration of the Euro area money market. European Central Bank Working Paper
Dagfinn R (2003) New electronic trading systems in the foreign exchange market. New Econ Handb I:471–504
Eisenschmidt J, Tapking J (2009) Liquidity risk premia in unsecured interbank money markets. European Central Bank Working Paper 1025
European Central Bank (2012) Annual report, 2011. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/annrep/ar2011en.pdf
Finger K, Fricke D, Lux T (2013) Network analysis of the e-MID overnight money market: the informational value of different aggregation levels for intrinsic dynamic processes. Comput Manag Sci 10(2):187–2011
Furfine CH (2000) Interbank payments and the daily federal funds rate. J Monet Econ 46(2):535–553
Furfine CH (2001) Banks as monitors of other banks: evidence from the overnight federal funds market. J Bus 74(1):33–57
Furfine CH (2002) The interbank market during a crisis. Eur Econ Rev 46(4–5):809–820
Gabbi G (2005) Semi-correlations as a tool for geographical and sector asset allocation. Eur J Finance 11(3):271–281
Gabrieli S (2012) Too-interconnected versus too-big-to-fail: banks’ network centrality and overnight interest rates. Banque de France Working Paper 398
Galbiati M, Delpini D, Battiston S (2013) The power to control. Nat Phys 9(3):126–128
Gale D, Yorulmazer T (2011) Liquidity hoarding. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Working Paper 488
Gaspar V, Quiros GP, Mendizabal HR (2008) Interest rate dispersion and volatility in the market for daily funds. Eur Econ Rev 52(3):413–440
George TJ, Kaul G, Nimalendran M (1991) Estimation of the bid-ask spread and its components: a new approach. Rev Financ Stud 4(4):623–656
Hamilton J (1996) The daily market for federal funds. J Econ Dyn Control 104(1):26–56
Heider F, Hoerova M, Holthausen C (2015) Liquidity hoarding and interbank market spreads: the role of counterparty risk. J Financ Econ 118(2):336–354
Hess AC, Frost PA (1982) Tests for price effects of new issues of seasoned securities. J Finance 37(1):11–25
Iazzetta C, Manna M (2009) The topology of the interbank market: developments in Italy since 1990. Bank of Italy Working Paper 711
Iori G, Renò R, de Masi G, Caldarelli G (2006) Trading strategies in the Italian interbank market. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 376(1):467–479
Iori G, De Masi G, Ovidiu VP, Gabbi G, Caldarelli G (2008) A network of the Italian overnight money market. J Econ Dyn Control 32(1):259–278
Iori G, Mantegna RN, Marotta L, Micciché S, Porter J, Tumminello M (2015a) Networked relationships in the e-MID interbank market: a trading model with memory. J Econ Dyn Control 50(C):98–116
Iori G, Kapar B, Olmo J (2015b) Bank characteristics and the interbank money market: a distributional approach. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Econom 19(3):249–283
Iori G, Politi M, Germano G, Gabbi G (2015c) Banks’ strategies and cost of money: effects of the financial crisis on the European electronic overnight interbank market. J Financ Manag Mark Inst 3(2):179–202
Karpoff JM (1987) The relation between price changes and trading volume: a survey. J Financ Quant Anal 22(1):109–126
Kraus A, Stoll HR (1972) Price impacts of block trading on the New York Stock Exchange. J Finance 27(3):569–588
Lamont O, Frazzini A (2007) The earnings announcement premium and trading volume. NBER Working Paper 13090
Michaud F-L, Upper C (2008) What drives interbank rates? Evidence from the Libor panel. BIS Quarterly Review, March
Rosu I (2009) A dynamic model of the limit order book. Rev Financ Stud 22(11):4601–4641
Scholes MS (1972) The market for securities: substitution versus price pressure and the effects of information on share prices. J Bus 45(2):179–211
Schwarz K (2018) Mind the gap: disentangling credit and liquidity in risk spreads. Working Paper, Wharton School
Tedeschi G, Recchioni MC, Berardi S (2018) An approach to identifying micro behavior: how banks strategies influence financial cycles. J Econ Behav Organ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.12.022 (in press)
Temizsoy A, Iori G, Montes-Rojas G (2015) The role of bank relationships in the interbank market. J Econ Dyn Control 59:118–141
Funding was provided by European Union (Grant No. 255987) and, for the Systemic Risk Centre, by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC, Grant No. ES/K002309/1).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kapar, B., Iori, G., Gabbi, G. et al. Market microstructure, banks’ behaviour and interbank spreads: evidence after the crisis. J Econ Interact Coord 15, 283–331 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-019-00248-3
- Interbank lending
- Market microstructure
- Subprime crisis
- Liquidity management