Skip to main content
Log in

CATIRI: An Efficient Method for Content-and-Text Based Image Retrieval

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The combination of visual and textual information in image retrieval remarkably alleviates the semantic gap of traditional image retrieval methods, and thus it has attracted much attention recently. Image retrieval based on such a combination is usually called the content-and-text based image retrieval (CTBIR). Nevertheless, existing studies in CTBIR mainly make efforts on improving the retrieval quality. To the best of our knowledge, little attention has been focused on how to enhance the retrieval efficiency. Nowadays, image data is widespread and expanding rapidly in our daily life. Obviously, it is important and interesting to investigate the retrieval efficiency. To this end, this paper presents an efficient image retrieval method named CATIRI (content-and-text based image retrieval using indexing). CATIRI follows a three-phase solution framework that develops a new indexing structure called MHIM-tree. The MHIM-tree seamlessly integrates several elements including Manhattan Hashing, Inverted index, and M-tree. To use our MHIM-tree wisely in the query, we present a set of important metrics and reveal their inherent properties. Based on them, we develop a top-k query algorithm for CTBIR. Experimental results based on benchmark image datasets demonstrate that CATIRI outperforms the competitors by an order of magnitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Datta R, Joshi D, Li J, Wang J Z. Image retrieval: Ideas, influences, and trends of the new age. ACM Computing Surveys, 2008, 40(2): Article No. 5.

  2. Long M, Cao Y, Wang J, Yu P S. Composite correlation quantization for efficient multimodal retrieval. In Proc. the 39th Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Jul. 2016, pp.579-588.

  3. Zhu L, Shen J, Xie L, Cheng Z. Unsupervised visual hashing with semantic assistant for content-based image retrieval. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2017, 29(2): 472-486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu B, Bu J, Chen C, Cai D, He X. EMR: A scalable graph-based ranking model for content-based image retrieval. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2015, 27(1): 102-114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shen H T, Jiang S, Tan K L, Huang Z, Zhou X. Speed up interactive image retrieval. The VLDB Journal, 2009, 18(1): 329-343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Falchi F, Lucchese C, Orlando S, Perego R, Rabitti F. Caching content-based queries for robust and efficient image retrieval. In Proc. the 12th Int. Conf. Extending Database Technology: Advances in Database Technology, Mar. 2009, pp.780-790.

  7. Zhang C, Chai J Y, Jin R. User term feedback in interactive text-based image retrieval. In Proc. the 28th Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Aug. 2005, pp.51-58.

  8. Li W, Duan L, Xu D, Tsang I W. Text-based image retrieval using progressive multi-instance learning. In Proc. Int. Conf. Computer Vision, Nov. 2011, pp.2049-2055.

  9. Wu L, Jin R, Jain A K. Tag completion for image retrieval. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2013, 35(3): 716-727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tong S, Chang E. Support vector machine active learning for image retrieval. In Proc. the 9th ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia, Sept. 2001, pp.107-118.

  11. Liu D, Hua K A, Vu K. Fast query point movement techniques with relevance feedback for content-based image retrieval. In Proc. the 10th Int. Conf. Extending Database Technology, Mar. 2006, pp.700-717.

  12. Kulis B, Grauman K. Kernelized locality-sensitive hashing for scalable image search. In Proc. the 12th IEEE Int. Conf. Computer Vision, Sept. 2009, pp.2130-2137.

  13. Smeulders A W M, Worring M, Santini S, Gupta A, Jain R C. Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2000, 22(12): 1349-1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Deng J, Berg A C, Li F F. Hierarchical semantic indexing for large scale image retrieval. In Proc. the 24th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Jun. 2011, pp.785-792.

  15. Ooi B C, Tan K L, Chua T S, Hsu W. Fast image retrieval using color-spatial information. The VLDB Journal, 1998, 7(2): 115-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xia H, Wu P, Hoi S C H, Jin R. Boosting multi-kernel locality-sensitive hashing for scalable image retrieval. In Proc. the 35th Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Aug. 2012, pp.55-64.

  17. Christel M G. Examining user interactions with video retrieval systems. In Proc. the 2017 International Society for Optical Engineering, Oct. 2007, Article No. 650606.

  18. Zhou X S, Huang T S. Unifying keywords and visual contents in image retrieval. IEEE Multimedia, 2002, 9(2): 23-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zagoris K, Chatzichristofis S A, Arampatzis A. Bag-of-visual-words vs global image descriptors on two-stage multimodal retrieval. In Proc. the 34th Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Dec. 2011, pp.1251-1252.

  20. Caicedo J C, Moreno J G, Niño E A, González F A. Combining visual features and text data for medical image retrieval using latent semantic kernels. In Proc. the 11th ACM SIGMM Int. Conf. Multimedia Information Retrieval, Mar. 2010, pp.359-366.

  21. Clinchant S, Ah-Pine J, Csurka G. Semantic combination of textual and visual information in multimedia retrieval. In Proc. the 1st ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia Retrieval, Apr. 2011, Article No. 44.

  22. Kong W, Li W J, Guo M. Manhattan hashing for large-scale image retrieval. In Proc. the 35th Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Aug. 2012, pp.45-54.

  23. Zobel J, Moffat A. Inverted files for text search engines. ACM Computing Surveys, 2006, 38(2): Article No. 6.

  24. Ciaccia P, Patella M, Zezula P. M-tree: An efficient access method for similarity search in metric spaces. In Proc. the 23rd Int. Conf. Very Large Data Bases, Aug. 1997, pp.426-435.

  25. Rasiwasia N, Pereira C J, Coviello E, Doyle G, Lanckriet G R G, Levy R, Vasconcelos N. A new approach to cross-modal multimedia retrieval. In Proc. the 18th ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia, Oct. 2010, pp.251-260.

  26. Yang C, Lozano-Pérez T. Image database retrieval with multiple-instance learning techniques. In Proc. the 16th Int. Conf. Data Engineering, Feb. 2000, pp.233-243.

  27. Natsev A, Rastogi R, Shim K. WALRUS: A similarity retrieval algorithm for image databases. In Proc. the 1999 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Jun. 1999, pp.395-406.

  28. Mamou J, Mass Y, Shmueli-Scheuer M, Sznajder B. A unified inverted index for an efficient image and text retrieval. In Proc. the 32nd Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Jul. 2009, pp.814-815.

  29. Rabitti F, Savino P. An information retrieval approach for image databases. In Proc. the 18th Int. Conf. Very Large Data Bases, Aug. 1992, pp.574-584.

  30. Chu W W, Ieong I T, Taira R K. A semantic modeling approach for image retrieval by content. The VLDB Journal, 1994, 3(4): 445-477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Brown L, Gruenwald L. A prototype content-based retrieval system that uses virtual images to save space. In Proc. the 27th Int. Conf. Very Large Data Bases, Sept. 2001, pp.693-694.

  32. Chen L, Gao Y, Xing Z, Jensen C S, Chen G. I2RS: A distributed geo-textual image retrieval and recommendation system. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2015, 8(12): 1884-1887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Oliva A, Torralba A. Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 2001, 42(3): 145-175.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Sivic J, Zisserman A. Video Google: A text retrieval approach to object matching in videos. In Proc. the 9th IEEE Int. Conf. Computer Vision, Oct. 2003, pp.1470-1477.

  35. Ponte J M, Croft W B. A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In Proc. the 21st Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Aug. 1998, pp.275-281.

  36. Zhai C, Lafferty J. A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to information retrieval. ACM Trans. Information Systems, 2004, 22(2): 179-214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Depeursinge A, Müller H. Fusion techniques for combining textual and visual information retrieval. In ImageCLEF, Experimental Evaluation in Visual Information Retrieval, Müller H, Clough P, Deselaers T, Caputo B (eds.), Springer, 2010, pp.95-114.

  38. Wang J, Liu W, Kumar S, Chang S. Learning to hash for indexing big data — A survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2016, 104(1): 34-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cao X, Chen L, Cong G, Jensen C S, Qu Q, Skovsgaard A, Wu D, Yiu M L. Spatial keyword querying. In Proc. the 31st Int. Conf. Conceptual Modeling, Oct. 2012, pp.16-29.

  40. Gong Y, Lazebnik S, Gordo A, Perronnin F. Iterative quantization: A procrustean approach to learning binary codes. In Proc. the 24th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Jun. 2011, pp.817-824.

  41. Hjaltason G R, Samet H. Distance browsing in spatial databases. ACM Trans. Database Systems, 1999, 24(2): 265-318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Grubinger M, Clough P, Müller H, Deselaers T. The IAPR TC-12 benchmark: A new evaluation resource for visual information systems. In Proc. International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, May 2006, pp.13-23.

  43. Russell B C, Torralba A, Murphy K P, Freeman W T. LabelMe: A database and web-based tool for image annotation. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 2008, 77(1/2/3): 157-173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chua T S, Tang J, Hong R, Li H, Luo Z, Zheng T Y. NUS-WIDE: A real-world web image database from National University of Singapore. In Proc. the 8th ACM Int. Conf. Image and Video Retrieval, Jul. 2009, Article No. 48.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Yao.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 592 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeng, M., Yao, B., Wang, ZJ. et al. CATIRI: An Efficient Method for Content-and-Text Based Image Retrieval. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 34, 287–304 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-019-1911-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-019-1911-2

Keywords

Navigation