Skip to main content
Log in

More Requests, Less Cost: Uncertain Inter-Datacenter Traffic Transmission with Multi-Tier Pricing

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the multi-tier pricing scheme provided by most of the cloud service providers (CSPs), the cloud users typically select a high enough transmission service level to ensure the quality of service (QoS), due to the severe penalty of missing the transmission deadline. This leads to the so-called over-provisioning problem, which increases the transmission cost of the cloud user. Given the fact that cloud users may not be aware of their traffic demand before accessing the network, the over-provisioning problem becomes more serious. In this paper, we investigate how to reduce the transmission cost from the perspective of cloud users, especially when they are not aware of their traffic demand before the transmission deadline. The key idea is to split a long-term transmission request into several short ones. By selecting the most suitable transmission service level for each short-term request, a cost-efficient inter-datacenter transmission service level selection framework is obtained. We further formulate the transmission service level selection problem as a linear programming problem and resolve it in an on-line style with Lyapunov optimization. We evaluate the proposed approach with real traffic data. The experimental results show that our method can reduce the transmission cost by up to 65.04%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anania L, Solomon R. Flat: The minimalist BISDN rate. University of Michigan Library Journal of Electronic Publishing, 1995, 1(2): 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xu H, Li B. Joint request mapping and response routing for geo-distributed cloud services. In Proc. the 32nd IEEE INFOCOM Conference, April 2013, pp.854-862.

  3. Dai W, Jordan S. ISP service tier design. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, 2016, 24(3): 1434-1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Laoutaris N, Sirivianos M, Yang X, Rodriguez P. Interdatacenter bulk transfers with NetStitcher. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 2011 Conference, August 2011, pp.74-85.

  5. Kandula S, Menache I, Schwartz R, Babbula S. Calendaring for wide area networks. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 2014 Conference, August 2014, pp.515-526.

  6. Spang B, Sabnis A, Sitaraman R, Towsley D, De-Cleene B. MON: Mission-optimized overlay networks. In Proc. the 36th IEEE INFOCOM Conference, May 2017.

  7. Zhang H, Chen K, Bai W, Han D, Tian C, Wang H, Guan H, Zhang M. Guaranteeing deadlines for inter-data center transfers. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, 2017, 25(1): 579-595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jalaparti V, Bliznets I, Kandula S, Lucier B, Menache I. Dynamic pricing and traffic engineering for timely inter-datacenter transfers. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 2016 Conference, August 2016, pp.73-86.

  9. Li W, Zhou X, Li K, Qi H, Guo D. More peak, less differentiation: Towards a pricing-aware online control framework for inter-datacenter transfers. In Proc. the 37th IEEE Int. Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, June 2017, pp.2105-2110.

  10. Golubchik L, Khuller S, Mukherjee K, Yao Y. To send or not to send: Reducing the cost of data transmission. In Proc. the 32nd IEEE INFOCOM Conference 2013, April 2013, pp.2472-2478.

  11. Divakaran D, Gurusamy M. Towards exible guarantees in clouds: Adaptive bandwidth allocation and pricing. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed System, 2015, 26(6): 1754-1764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tang S, Yuan J, Li X. Towards optimal bidding strategy for Amazon EC2 cloud spot instance. In Proc. the 5th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing, June 2012, pp.91-98.

  13. Yang S, Kuipers F. Traffic uncertainty models in network planning. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2014, 52(2): 172-177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aparicio-Pardo R, Pavón-Mariño P, Mukherjee B. Robust upgrade in optical networks under traffic uncertainty. In Proc. the 16th International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modelling, April 2012.

  15. Chen F, Wu C, Hong X, Lu Z, Wang Z, Lin C. Engineering traffic uncertainty in the openflow data plane. In Proc. the 35th IEEE INFOCOM Conference, April 2016.

  16. Mitra D,Wang Q. Stochastic traffic engineering for demand uncertainty and risk-aware network revenue management. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, 2005, 13(2): 221-233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alizadeh M, Yang S, Sharif M, Katti S, McKeown N, Prabhakar B, Shenker S. pFabric: Minimal near-optimal datacenter transport. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 2013 Conference, August 2013, pp.435-446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bai W, Chen K, Wang H, Chen L, Han D, Tian C. Information-agnostic flow scheduling for commodity data centers. In Proc. the 12th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, May 2015, pp.455-468.

  19. Wang T, Xu H, Liu F. Aemon: Information-agnostic mixflow scheduling in data center networks. In Proc. the 1st Asia-Pacific Workshop on Networking, APNet, August 2017, pp.106-112.

  20. Jin X, Li Y, Wei D, Li S, Gao J, Xu L, Li G, Xu W, Rexford J. Optimizing bulk transfers with software-defined optical-WAN. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 2016 Conference, August 2016, pp.87-100.

  21. Noormohammadpour M, Raghavendra C, Rao S. Dcroute: Speeding up inter-datacenter traffic allocation while guaranteeing deadlines. In Proc. the 23rd IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing, December 2016, pp.82-90.

  22. Lin Y, Shen H, Chen L. Ecoflow: An economical and deadline-driven inter-datacenter video flow scheduling system. In Proc. the 23rd ACM Conference on Multimedia Conference, October 2015, pp.1059-1062.

  23. Hong C, Caesar M, Godfrey B. Finishing flows quickly with preemptive scheduling. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 2012 Conference, August 2012, pp.127-138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Munir A, Baig G, Irteza S, Qazi I, Liu A, Dogar F. Friends, not foes: Synthesizing existing transport strategies for data center networks. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 2014 Conference, August 2014, pp.491-502.

  25. Chen L, Chen K, Bai W, Alizadeh M. Scheduling mix-flows in commodity datacenters with Karuna. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 2016 Conference, August 2016, pp.174-187.

  26. Valancius V, Lumezanu C, Feamster N, Johari R, Vazirani V. How many tiers?: Pricing in the Internet transit market. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 2011 Conference, August 2011, pp.194-205.

  27. Li S, Huang J. Price differentiation for communication networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, 2014, 22(3): 703-716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu H, Li B. Spot transit: Cheaper Internet transit for elastic traffic. IEEE Trans. Services Computing, 2015, 8(5): 768-781.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Paxson V, Floyd S. Wide-area traffic: The failure of Poisson modeling. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 1994 Conference, September 1994, pp.257-268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kopetz H, Ochsenreiter W. Clock synchronization in distributed real-time systems. IEEE Trans. Computers, 1987, 36(8): 933-940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-Bo Zhou.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 146 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dong, XD., Chen, S., Zhao, LP. et al. More Requests, Less Cost: Uncertain Inter-Datacenter Traffic Transmission with Multi-Tier Pricing. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 33, 1152–1163 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-018-1878-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-018-1878-4

Keywords

Navigation