Architectural Design of a Cloud Robotic System for Upper-Limb Rehabilitation with Multimodal Interaction
- 110 Downloads
The rise in the cases of motor impairing illnesses demands the research for improvements in rehabilitation therapy. Due to the current situation that the service of the professional therapists cannot meet the need of the motor-impaired subjects, a cloud robotic system is proposed to provide an Internet-based process for upper-limb rehabilitation with multimodal interaction. In this system, therapists and subjects are connected through the Internet using client/server architecture. At the client site, gradual virtual games are introduced so that the subjects can control and interact with virtual objects through the interaction devices such as robot arms. Computer graphics show the geometric results and interaction haptic/force is fed back during exercising. Both video/audio information and kinematical/physiological data are transferred to the therapist for monitoring and analysis. In this way, patients can be diagnosed and directed and therapists can manage therapy sessions remotely. The rehabilitation process can be monitored through the Internet. Expert libraries on the central server can serve as a supervisor and give advice based on the training data and the physiological data. The proposed solution is a convenient application that has several features taking advantage of the extensive technological utilization in the area of physical rehabilitation and multimodal interaction.
Keywordscloud robot multimodal interaction motor rehabilitation haptic/force feedback
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Van Elk M G, Driessen B J F, Dorrepaal M, van der Werff J J, van der Meche E G, Aulbers A P. A motorized gravity compensation mechanism used for active rehabilitation of upper limbs. In Proc. the 9th IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, June 28-July 1, 2005, pp.152-155.Google Scholar
- Burgar C G, Lum P S, Shor P C, Machiel Van der Loos H F. Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: The Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 2000, 37(6): 663-673.Google Scholar
- Reinkensmeyer D J, Kahn L E, Arerbuch M, McKenna-Cole A, Schmit B D, Rymer W Z. Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: Progress with the arm guide. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 2000, 37(6): 653-662.Google Scholar
- Krebs H I, Volpe B T, Aisen M L, Hogan N. Increasing productivity and quality of care: Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 2000, 37(6): 639-652.Google Scholar
- Zhang Y B, Wang Z X, Ji L H, Bi S. The clinical application of the upper extremity compound movements rehabilitation training robot. In Proc. the 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, June 28-July 1, 2005, pp.91-94.Google Scholar
- Daly J J, Hogan N, Perepezko E M, Krebs H I, Rogers J M, Goyal K S, Dohring M E, Fredrickson E, Nethery J, Ruff R L. Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 2005, 42(6): 723-736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lum P S, Burgar C G, Loos M V. The use of a robotic device for post-stroke movement therapy. In Proc. the Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, April 1997, pp.107-110.Google Scholar
- Shahbazi M, Atashzar S F, Patel R V. A framework for supervised robotics-assisted mirror rehabilitation therapy. In Proc. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sept. 2014, pp.3567-3572.Google Scholar
- Huijgen B C, Vollenbroek-Hutten M M, Zampolini M, Opisso E, Bernabeu M, van Nieuwenhoven J, Ilsbroukx S, Magni R, Giacomozzi C, Marcellari V, Marchese S S, Hermens H J. Feasibility of a home-based telerehabilitation system compared to usual care: Arm/hand function in patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury and multiple sclerosis. J. Telemed. Telecare, 2008, 14(5): 249-256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Forducey P G, Ruwe W D, Dawson S J, Scheideman-Miller C, McDonald N B, Hantla M R. Using telerehabilitation to promote TBI recovery and transfer of knowledge. NeuroRehabilitation, 2003, 18(2): 103-111.Google Scholar