Skip to main content
Log in

Tag Correspondence Model for User Tag Suggestion

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some microblog services encourage users to annotate themselves with multiple tags, indicating their attributes and interests. User tags play an important role for personalized recommendation and information retrieval. In order to better understand the semantics of user tags, we propose Tag Correspondence Model (TCM) to identify complex correspondences of tags from the rich context of microblog users. The correspondence of a tag is referred to as a unique element in the context which is semantically correlated with this tag. In TCM, we divide the context of a microblog user into various sources (such as short messages, user profile, and neighbors). With a collection of users with annotated tags, TCM can automatically learn the correspondences of user tags from multiple sources. With the learned correspondences, we are able to interpret implicit semantics of tags. Moreover, for the users who have not annotated any tags, TCM can suggest tags according to users’ context information. Extensive experiments on a real-world dataset demonstrate that our method can efficiently identify correspondences of tags, which may eventually represent semantic meanings of tags.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 2001, 27: 415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang H, Xu Y, Li Y, Nayak R, Tao X. Connecting users and items with weighted tags for personalized item recommendations. In Proc. the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, June 2010, pp.51-60.

  3. Peng J, Zeng D, Zhao H, Wang F. Collaborative filtering in social tagging systems based on joint item-tag recommendations. In Proc. the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Oct. 2010, pp.809-818.

  4. Zhen Y, Li W, Yeung D. TagiCoFi: Tag informed collaborative filtering. In Proc. the 3rd ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Oct. 2009, pp.69-76.

  5. Symeonidis P, Nanopoulos A, Manolopoulos Y. Tag recommendations based on tensor dimensionality reduction. In Proc. the 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Oct. 2008, pp.43-50.

  6. Rendle S, Marinho L B, Nanopoulos A, Schmidt-Thieme L. Learning optimal ranking with tensor factorization for tag recommendation. In Proc. the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, June 28-July 1, 2009, pp.727-736.

  7. Rendle S, Schmidt-Thieme L. Pairwise interaction tensor factorization for personalized tag recommendation. In Proc. the 3rd ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, Feb. 2010, pp.81-90.

  8. Jäschke R, Marinho L B, Hotho A, Schmidt-Thieme L, Stumme G. Tag recommendations in social bookmarking systems. AI Communications, 2008, 21(4): 231–247.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohkura T, Kiyota Y, Nakagawa H. Browsing system for weblog articles based on automated folksonomy. In Proc. the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, May 2006.

  10. Mishne G. AutoTag: A collaborative approach to automated tag assignment for weblog posts. In Proc. the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, May 2006, pp.953-954.

  11. Lee S, Chun A. Automatic tag recommendation for the Web 2.0 blogosphere using collaborative tagging and hybrid ANN semantic structures. In Proc. the 6th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Computer Science, Apr. 2007, pp.88-93.

  12. Katakis I, Tsoumakas G, Vlahavas I. Multilabel text classification for automated tag suggestion. In Proc. the European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, volume 18, Sept. 2008.

  13. Fujimura S, Fujimura K, Okuda H. Blogosonomy: Autotagging any text using bloggers’ knowledge. In Proc. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, Nov. 2007, pp.205-212.

  14. Heymann P, Ramage D, Garcia-Molina H. Social tag prediction. In Proc. the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, July 2008, pp.531-538.

  15. Blei D, Ng A, Jordan M. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003, 3: 993–1022.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Krestel R, Fankhauser P, Nejdl W. Latent Dirichlet allocation for tag recommendation. In Proc. the 3rd ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Oct. 2009, pp.61-68.

  17. Si X, Sun M. Tag-LDA for scalable real-time tag recommendation. Journal of Computational Information Systems, 2009, 6(1): 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Z, Tu C, Sun M. Tag dispatch model with social network regularization for microblog user tag suggestion. In Proc. the 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Dec. 2012, pp.755-764.

  19. Bundschus M, Yu S, Tresp V, Rettinger A, Dejori M, Kriegel H. Hierarchical Bayesian models for collaborative tagging systems. In Proc. the 9th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Dec. 2009, pp.728-733.

  20. Iwata T, Yamada T, Ueda N. Modeling social annotation data with content relevance using a topic model. In Proc. the 23rd Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Dec. 2009, pp.835-843.

  21. Blei D, Jordan M. Modeling annotated data. In Proc. the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, July 28- August 1, 2003, pp.127-134.

  22. Griffiths T, Steyvers M. Finding scientific topics. Proc. the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004, 101(Suppl 1): 5228–5235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Heinrich G. Parameter estimation for text analysis. Technical Report, vsonix GmbH + University of Leipzig, Germany, May 2005.

  24. Andrieu C, de Freitas N, Doucet A, Jordan M. An introduction to MCMC for machine learning. Machine Learning, 2003, 50(1/2): 5–43.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Manning C D, Raghavan P, Sch¨utze H. Introduction to Information Retrieval, Volume 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.

  26. Mei Q, Cai D, Zhang D, Zhai C. Topic modeling with network regularization. In Proc. the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, Apr. 2008, pp.101-110.

  27. Chang J, Blei D M. Relational topic models for document networks. In Proc. the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Apr. 2009, pp.81-88.

  28. Cohn D, Chang H. Learning to probabilistically identify authoritative documents. In Proc. ICML, June 29-July 2, 2000, pp.167-174.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhi-Yuan Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tu, CC., Liu, ZY. & Sun, MS. Tag Correspondence Model for User Tag Suggestion. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 30, 1063–1072 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-015-1582-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-015-1582-6

Keywords

Navigation