Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis and Implementation of an Open Programmable Router Based on Forwarding and Control Element Separation

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A router architecture based upon ForCES (Forwarding and Control Element Separation), which is being standardized by IETF ForCES working group, gains its competitive advantage over traditional router architectures in flexibility, programmability, and cost-effectiveness. In this paper, design and implementation of a ForCES-based router (ForTER) is illustrated. Firstly, the implementation architecture of ForTER is discussed. Then, a layered software model, which well illustrates ForCES features, is proposed. Based on the model, design and implementation of Control Element (CE) and Forwarding Element (FE) in ForTER are introduced in detail. Moreover, security for ForTER is considered and an algorithm to prevent DoS attacks is presented. Lastly, experiments of ForTER are illustrated for routing and running routing protocols, network management, DoS attack prevention, etc. The experimental results show the feasibility of the ForTER design. Consequently, the ForTER implementation basically testifies the feasibility of ForCES architecture and some IETF ForCES specifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Struck B, Weingarten M. Next Gen Switch/Router design issues: Tomorrow’s LANs, SANs and WANs will need more coprocessors, plus bigger buffers and programmable-on-the-fly, non-blocking switch/routers. Business Communication Review, 2004, 34(10): 44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jian-Ping Wu, Ke Xu. Research on next-generation Internet architecture. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2006, 21(5): 723–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guan-Qun Gu, Jun-Zhou Luo. Some issues on computer networks: Architecture and key technologies. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2006, 21(5): 708–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang W, Dong L. Design and performance evaluation of general router management protocol (GRMP). In Proc. IEEE TENCON, Chiang Mai, Thailand, Nov. 2004, pp.37–40.

  5. Calvert K L, Campbell A T, Lazar A A, Wetherall D, Yavatkar R. Active and programmable networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2001, 19(3): 401–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. OPENSIG. http://comet.ctr.columbia.edu/opensig/.

  7. El-Darieby M, Rolia J, Petriu D C. Performance modeling for virtual network-based service provisioning. In Proc. IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management, Seattle, USA, May 2001, pp.139–152.

  8. Biswas J et al. The IEEE P1520 standards initiative for programmable network interfaces. IEEE Communications Magazine, 1998, 36(10): 64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Multi-protocol over ATM version 1.0. The ATM Forum Technical Committee. AF-MPOA-0087.000, July 1997.

  10. General switch management protocol. http://www.networkso-rcery.com/enp/protocol/gsmp.htm.

  11. Newman P, Minshall G, Lyon T, Huston L. IP switching and gigabit routers. IEEE Communications Magazine, 1997, 35(1): 64–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Multiservice switching forum. http://www.msforum.org/.

  13. Forwarding and control element separation (forces). http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/forces-charter.html.

  14. Network processing forum (NPF). http://www.npforum.org/.

  15. Woo T, Faynberg I. The softrouter concept and the proposal for the study of separation of forwarding and routing in the next generation network. http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/ngn/fgngn/docs/FGNGN-004-June04.doc.

  16. SoftRouter. http://www.bell-labs.com/org/11347A/projects.htm#SoftRouter.

  17. Naik U et al. IXA portability framework: Preerving software investment in network processor applications. Intel Technology Journal, 2002, 6(3): 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Doria A, Wang W, Dong L et al. ForCES protocol specification. Internet-Draft, work in progress, http://www.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-forces-protocol/.

  19. Halpern J et al. ForCES forwarding element model. Internet-Draft, work in progress, http://www.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-forces-model/.

  20. Haas R, Suzuki T. Architecture of the flexinet forCES-based control point. In Presentation in 63rd IETF Meeting, Paris, France, Aug. 2005, http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/05aug/slides/forces-1/forces-1.ppt.

  21. Haleplidis E, Haas R, Denazis S, Koufopavlou O. A web service- and ForCES-based programmable router architecture. In Presentation in International Working Conference on Active and Programmable Netwoks (IWAN), Sophia Antipolis, France, Nov. 2005, http://www.enslyon.fr/LIP/RESO/iwan2005/slides/IWAN05-Haleplidis.ppt.

  22. Chrysoulas C et al. A distributed router’s modeling and implementation. ESRGroups Research Report, Dec. 2006.

  23. Hidell M, Hagsand O, Sjodin P. Distributed control for decentralized modular routers. In Proc. SNCNW, Karlstad, Sweden, Nov. 2004, pp.9–13.

  24. Hidell M et al. Control and forwarding plane interaction in distributed routers. In Proc. 4th International IFIPTC6 Networking Conference, Waterloo, Canada, May 2005, pp.1339–1342.

  25. Fu J, Hagsand O. A programming model for a forwarding element. In Proc. SNCNW, Karlstad, Sweden, Nov. 2004, http://www.ee.kth.se/php/modules/publications/reports/2004/IR-EE-LCN_2004_002.pdf.

  26. Fu J, Hagsand O. Designing and evaluating network processor applications. In Proc. IEEE Workshop on High Performance Switching and Routing, Hong-Kong, May 2005, pp.142–146.

  27. Wang W et al. Design and implementation of an open programmable router compliant to IETF ForCES specifications. In Proc. ICN, Martinique, France, April 2007, p.82.

  28. Lakkavali S, Khosravi H. ForCES protocol design analysis for protection against DoS attacks. In Proc. ICCCN, Oct. 2004, pp.550–554.

  29. Wang W, Dong L, Zhuge B. TCP and UDP based ForCES protocol TML over IP networks. Internet-Draft, work in progress, http://www.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-forces-iptml/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Networks and Communications Engineering, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, 310018, China

    Wei-Ming Wang, Li-Gang Dong & Bin Zhuge

Authors
  1. Wei-Ming Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Li-Gang Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bin Zhuge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-Ming Wang.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 60573116 and 60603072, the National High Technology Development 863 Program of China under Grant No. 2007AA01Z201, the Zhejiang Provincial NSF China under Grant Nos. Z106829, Y106747, and the Zhejiang Sci & Tech Project under Grant No. 2006C11215.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 95.3 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, WM., Dong, LG. & Zhuge, B. Analysis and Implementation of an Open Programmable Router Based on Forwarding and Control Element Separation. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 23, 769–779 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-008-9181-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-008-9181-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation