Quantitative and qualitative characterisation of humic products with spectral parameters
- 268 Downloads
The application of different humic products for the treatment of soils and plants has increased in recent years. The characteristics of humic products, such as the content and composition of organic carbon and the maturity, provide valuable information which is essential for an adequate application. Such information is crucial for manufacturers, business consultants and users involved in the production, distribution and implementation of humic products. This article presents the correlation between the quantitative indicators of commercial humic products and their spectral characteristics via measurements in the ultraviolet spectrum at 300 nm, in the visible area at 445 and 665 nm and in the near-infrared spectrum at 850 nm.
Materials and methods
We evaluated humic products (liquid and solid) of different origins. Via wet combustion, the content of total organic carbon in humic products can be determined. The precipitation of humic acids from the starting solution determines the composition of the humic products in terms of humic acids (HAs) and fulvic acids (FAs). The dissolution of HAs determines their concentration by titration, while the specific extinction can be assessed via spectrophotometry via measuring the absorption of HAs spectra at the following wavelengths: 300, 465, 665 and 850 nm. The degree of aromaticity and condensation of humic products determines the optical density of the HAs via the E4/E6 ratio.
Results and discussion
The content of total organic carbon varied widely from 0.55 to 37.5% across all groups. The content of carbon in HAs, as a percentage of the total carbon in fulvic-type humic products, ranged from 1.29 to 16.00%, while in humic-type products, it ranged from 51.43 to 91.92%. The minimum value of the E4/E6 ratio was 2.97, while the maximum value was 6.35. We observed a direct relationship between the dominant type of acids in humic products and the E4/E6 ratio.
The optical density of HAs indicates their quality characteristics. The presented optical characteristics for humic products show that there is a direct relationship, especially between HAs/FAs and E4/E6 ratios. Measurement at 300 nm (E300) in the near-ultraviolet area and at 850 nm (E850) in the near-infrared area can increase the range of the spectral study.
KeywordsE300 E850 Fulvic acids Humic acids Humic products Optical characteristics Ratio E465/E665
- Amran ES, Chang HY, Jusoh FB, Liew JY (2017) Minimal duration of humic acid isolation from secondary forest soil of Kelantan, Malaysia. IJAR 3(4):362–366Google Scholar
- Flicheva E (2015) Characteristics of soil organic matter of Bulgarian soils. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, p 178Google Scholar
- Filcheva E, Ilieva R, Chakalov K, Popova T, Savov V, Hristova M (2017) Characterization of humic system in fertilizer raw materials. J Agric Sci Technol A 7(1):11–17Google Scholar
- Guggenberger G (2005) Humification and mineralisation in soils. Microorganisms in soils: roles in genesis and functions:85–106Google Scholar
- Kalembasa D, Becher M (2009) Properties of organic matter in chosen soils fertilised with sewage sludge. Environ Protect Eng 35(2):165–171Google Scholar
- Kondratowicz-Maciejewska K (2007) Effects of crop rotation and different fertilisation systems on the content of dissolved organic carbon in soil. Humic Subsets Ecosys 7:79–82Google Scholar
- Kondratowicz-Maciejewska K, Kobierski M, Zdrodowski T (2011) Effect of soil management practices in orchards and cultivated fields on selected properties of humic substances. Polish J Soil Sci 44(2):167–176Google Scholar
- Kononova MM (1966) Soil organic matter, its nature, origin and role in soil fertility. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 400–410Google Scholar
- Peacock M, Evans CD, Fenner N, Freeman C, Gough R, Jones TG, Lebron I (2014) UV-visible absorbance spectroscopy as a proxy for peatland dissolved organic carbon (DOC) quantity and quality: considerations on wavelength and absorbance degradation. Environ Sci Process Impacts 16(6):1445–1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sparks DL, Fendorf SE, Toner CV, Carski TH (1996) Kinetic methods and measurements. Soil Sci Soc Am, Am Soc Agron 1275–1307Google Scholar
- Voroney RP, Brookes PC, Beyaert RP (2008) Soil microbial biomass C, N, P, and S. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Rato, pp 637–651Google Scholar