Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ranking of wetting–drying, plant, and fauna factors involved in the structure dynamics of a young constructed Technosol

  • Soils, Sec 5 • Soil and Landscape Ecology • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Dynamical in situ observation of biological and climatic structuring factors involved in pedogenesis has not previously been possible in a way that would consider the early stages of pedogenesis. If studies have explored the effect of pedogenetic factors on soil structure, none have succeeded in ranking them in view of the intensity of their effects. We propose a novel approach for describing the aggregation process for a constructed Technosol obtained from a process of pedological engineering.

Materials and methods

We focus on agents including plants, macrofauna, and water, and we use (i) a dynamic in situ observation and (ii) the quantification of the evolution of selected descriptors of pores and aggregates. They are quantified from high-resolution images obtained with the Soilinsight® device. Associating those images with each other, movies of interactions between soil and organisms over a 14-month non-destructive soil evolution experiment are made.

Results and discussion

Agents influencing aggregation—plant roots, earthworms, and water—can be ranked according to their impact on soil structure. During the studied period of evolution, wetting–drying cycles are the first to operate. The intensity of their action on soil structure is dominant at the very first stages of pedogenesis. Despite this ranking of agents, over the long term, plants and earthworms have a more intense effect on soil structure than wetting–drying cycles.

Conclusions

The method applied to observe and quantify soil structure dynamics is thus proposed as a helpful approach to modeling other processes involved in soil functioning and evolution in relation to their ability to fulfill ecosystem services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amezketa E (1999) Soil aggregate stability: a review. J Sustai Agr 14(2–3):83–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andriuzzi WS, Bolger T, Schmidt O (2013) The drilosphere concept: fine-scale incorporation of surface residue-derived N and C around natural Lumbricus terrestris burrows. Soil Biol Biochem 64:136–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Angers DA, Caron J (1998) Plant-induced changes in soil structure: processes and feedbacks. Biogeochem 42:55–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attou F, Bruand A (1998) Experimental study of “fragipans” formation in soils. Role of both clay dispersion and wetting-drying cycles. C R Acad Sci Ser IIA Earth Planet Sci 326:545–552

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baize D (2000) Guide des analyses en pédologie: choix, expression, présentation, interprétation. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell CW, Asao S, Calderon F, Wolk B, Wallenstein MD (2015) Plant nitrogen uptake drives rhizosphere bacterial community assembly during plant growth. Soil Biol Biochem 85:170–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bottinelli N, Henry-des-Tureaux T, Hallaire V, Mathieu J, Benard Y, Duc Tran T, Jouquet P (2010) Earthworms accelerate soil porosity turnover under watering conditions. Geoderma 156:43–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouché M (1975) Action de la faune sur les états de la matière organique dans les ecosystèmes. In: Kilbertus G, Reisinger O, Mourey A, Cancela da Fonseca JS (eds) Biodégradation et Humification. Pierron, Sarreguemines, France, pp 157–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown GG, Barois I, Lavelle P (2000) Regulation of soil organic matter dynamics and microbial activity in the drilosphere and the role of interactions with other edaphic functional domains. Eur J Soil Biol 36:177–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruand A, Cousin I, Nicoullaud B, Duval O, Bégon JC (1996) Backscattered electron scanning images of soil porosity for analyzing soil compaction around roots. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:895–901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caro G, Abourachid A, Decaëns T, Buono L, Mathieu J (2012) Is earthworms’ dispersal facilitated by the ecosystem engineering activities of conspecifics? Biol Fertil Soils 48:961–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deeb M, Desjardins T, Podwojewski P, Pando A, Blouin M, Lerch TZ (2017) Interactive effects of compost, plants and earthworms on the aggregations of constructed Technosols. Geoderma 305:305–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denef K, Six J, Bossuyt H, Frey SD, Elliott ET, Merckx R, Paustian K (2001) Influence of dry-wet cycles on the interrelationship between aggregate, particulate organic matter, and microbial community dynamics. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1599–1611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter AR (1987) Compression of soil around roots. Plant Soil 97:401–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst G, Müller A, Göhler H, Emmerling C (2008) C and N turnover of fermented residues from biogas plants in soil in the presence of three different earthworm species (Lumbricus terrestris, Aporrectodea longa, Aporrectodea caliginosa). Soil Biol Biochem 40:1413–1420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fründ HC, Butt K, Capowiez Y, Eisenhauer N, Emmerling C, Ernst G, Potthoff M, Schädler M, Schrader S (2010) Using earthworms as model organisms in the laboratory: recommendations for experimental implementations. Pedobiologia 53:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes CV, DeAngelis KM, Firestone MK (2007) 1 - Root interactions with soil microbial communities and processes. In: Whitbeck ZGCL.(ed) The Rhizosphere. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 1–29

  • Haynes RJ, Beare MH (1997) Influence of six crop species on aggregate stability and some labile organic matter fractions. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1647–1653

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinsinger P, Bengough AG, Vetterlein D, Young IM (2009) Rhizosphere: biophysics, biogeochemistry and ecological relevance. Plant and Soil 321(1-2):117–152

  • Huhta V, Wright DH, Coleman DC (1989) Characteristics of defaunated soil. I: a comparison of three techniques applied to two different forest soils Pedobiologica 33(6):417–426

  • IUSS Working Group WRB, World Reference Base for soil Resources (2006) A framework for international classification, correlation and communication: 2nd edn. World Soil Resources Reports, 132, p 145

  • Jangorzo NS, Watteau F, Schwartz C (2013) Evolution of the pore structure of constructed Technosols during early pedogenesis quantified by image analysis. Geoderma 207-208:180–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jangorzo NS, Schwartz C, Watteau F (2014) Image analysis of soil thin sections for a non-destructive quantification of aggregation in the early stages of pedogenesis. Eur J Soil Sci 65:485–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jangorzo NS, Watteau F, Hajos D, Schwartz C (2015) Nondestructive monitoring of the effect of biological activity on the pedogenesis of a Technosol. J Soils Sediments 15(8):1705–1715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle P (1988) Earthworm activities and the soil system. Biol Fertility of Soils 6:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leguédois S, Séré G, Auclerc A, Cortet J, Huot H, Ouvrard S, Watteau F, Schwartz C, Morel JL (2016) Modelling pedogenesis of Technosols. Geoderma 262:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe CN, Butt KR (2005) Culture techniques for soil dwelling earthworms: a review. Pedobiologia 49:401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu C, Pieltain F, Asseline J, Chossat, JC, Valentin CH (1998) Analyse physique des sols: méthodes choisies. TEC & DOC, Lassay-les-Chateaux

  • Milleret R, Le Bayon RC, Gobat JM (2009) Root, mycorrhiza and earthworm interactions: their effects on soil structuring processes, plant and soil nutrient concentration and plant biomass. Plant Soil 316:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niewczas J, Witkowka-Walczak B (2005) The soil aggregates stability index (ASI) and its extreme values. Soil Till Res 80:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pey B (2010) Diversité et rôle fonctionnel de la faune du sol dans un sol construit en milieu industriel: contribution à la modélisation de l’évolution d’un Technosol. Thèse de Doctorat de l’INPL, Nancy, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Pey B, Cortet J, Capowiez Y, Nahmani J, Watteau F, Schwartz C (2014) Technosol composition affects Lumbricus terrestris surface cast composition and production. Ecol Eng 67:238–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pey B, Cortet J, Watteau F, Cheynier K, Schwartz C (2013) Structure of earthworm burrows related to organic matter of a constructed Technosol. Geoderma 202–203:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Séré G, Schwartz C, Ouvrard S, Renat JC, Watteau F, Villemin G, Morel JL (2010) Early pedogenic evolution of constructed Technosols. J Soils Sediments 10:1246–1254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Séré G, Schwartz C, Ouvrard S, Sauvage C, Renat JC, Morel JL (2008) Soil construction: a step for ecological reclamation of derelict lands. J Soils Sediments 8:130–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singer MJ (1992) Stability of synthetic sand-clay aggregates after wetting and drying cycles. In. Bronick and Lal (2005). Soil structure and management: a review. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1843–1848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, Denef K (2004) A history of research on the link between (micro) aggregates, soil biota and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Till Res 79:7–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smetak KM, Johnson-Maynard JL, Lloyd JE (2007) Earthworm population density and diversity in different-aged urban systems. Appl Soil Ecol 37:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taina IA, Heck RJ, Elliot TR (2008) Application of X-ray computed tomography to soil science: a literature review. Can J Soil Sci 88:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall JM, Oades JM (1982) Organic matter and water stable-aggregates in soils. J Soil Sci 33(2):141–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zangerlé A, Pando A, Lavelle P (2011) Do earthworms and roots cooperate to build soil macroaggregates? A microcosm experiment. Geoderma 167-168:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the French Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research (MENESR). The authors gratefully acknowledge Laboratoire Sols et Environnement technical staff, Alain Rakoto and Stéphane Colin, for their assistance in the realization of the Soilinsight® device. The authors also acknowledge “Films d’ICI” society for the movie production.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Université Dan Dicko Dankoulodo, BP 465, Maradi, Niger

    Nouhou Salifou Jangorzo

  2. Laboratoire Sols et Environnement, Université de Lorraine, Inra, F-54000, Nancy, France

    Nouhou Salifou Jangorzo, Françoise Watteau & Christophe Schwartz

Authors
  1. Nouhou Salifou Jangorzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Françoise Watteau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christophe Schwartz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Schwartz.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Richard K. Shaw

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(MOV 48663 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jangorzo, N.S., Watteau, F. & Schwartz, C. Ranking of wetting–drying, plant, and fauna factors involved in the structure dynamics of a young constructed Technosol. J Soils Sediments 18, 2995–3004 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-1968-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-1968-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation